IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v220y2009i24p3589-3598.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modelling the effect of in-stream and overland dispersal on gene flow in river networks

Author

Listed:
  • Chaput-Bardy, A.
  • Fleurant, C.
  • Lemaire, C.
  • Secondi, J.

Abstract

Modelling gene flow across natural landscapes is a current challenge of population genetics. Models are essential to make clear predictions about conditions that cause genetic differentiation or maintain connectivity between populations. River networks are a special case of landscape matrix. They represent stretches of habitat connected according to a branching pattern where dispersal is usually limited to upstream or downstream movements. Because of their peculiar topology, and the increasing concern about conservation issues in hydrosystems, there has been a recent revival of interest in modelling dispersal in river networks. Network complexity has been shown to influence global population differentiation. However, geometric characteristics are likely to interact with the way individuals move across space. Studies have focused on in-stream movements. None of the work published so far took into consideration the ability of many species to disperse overland between branches of the same network though. We predicted that the relative contribution of these two dispersal modalities (in-stream and overland) would affect the overall genetic structure. We simulated dispersal in synthetic river networks using an individual-based model. We tested the effect of dispersal modalities, i.e. the ratio of overland/in-stream dispersal, and two geometric parameters, bifurcation angle between branches and network complexity. Data revealed that if geometrical parameters affected population differentiation, dispersal parameters had the strongest effect. Interestingly, we observed a quadratic relationship between p the proportion of overland dispersers and population differentiation. We interpret this U-shape pattern as a balance between isolation by distance caused by in-stream movements at low values of p and intense migrant exchanges within the same branching unit at high values of p. Our study is the first attempt to model out-of-network movements. It clearly shows that both geometric and dispersal parameters interact. Both should be taken into consideration in order to refine predictions about dispersal and gene flow in river network.

Suggested Citation

  • Chaput-Bardy, A. & Fleurant, C. & Lemaire, C. & Secondi, J., 2009. "Modelling the effect of in-stream and overland dispersal on gene flow in river networks," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(24), pages 3589-3598.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:220:y:2009:i:24:p:3589-3598
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.06.027
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380009004128
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.06.027?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ceddia, M. Graziano & Bartlett, Mark & Perrings, Charles, 2007. "Landscape gene flow, coexistence and threshold effect: The case of genetically modified herbicide tolerant oilseed rape (Brassica napus)," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 205(1), pages 169-180.
    2. Vuilleumier, Séverine & Fontanillas, Pierre, 2007. "Landscape structure affects dispersal in the greater white-toothed shrew: Inference between genetic and simulated ecological distances," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 201(3), pages 369-376.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vuilleumier, Séverine & Bolker, Benjamin M. & Lévêque, Olivier, 2010. "Effects of colonization asymmetries on metapopulation persistence," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 78(3), pages 225-238.
    2. Jager, Henriette I. & DeAngelis, Donald L., 2018. "The confluences of ideas leading to, and the flow of ideas emerging from, individual-based modeling of riverine fishes," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 384(C), pages 341-352.
    3. Li, Weiming & Chen, Qiuwen & Cai, Desuo & Li, Ruonan, 2015. "Determination of an appropriate ecological hydrograph for a rare fish species using an improved fish habitat suitability model introducing landscape ecology index," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 311(C), pages 31-38.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Groeneveld, Rolf A. & Wesseler, Justus & Berentsen, Paul B.M., 2013. "Dominos in the dairy: An analysis of transgenic maize in Dutch dairy farming," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 107-116.
    2. Breustedt, Gunnar & Latacz-Lohmann, Uwe & Müller-Scheeßel, Jörg, 2013. "Impact of alternative information requirements on the coexistence of genetically modified (GM) and non-GM oilseed rape in the EU," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 104-115.
    3. Simpkins, Craig E. & Dennis, Todd E. & Etherington, Thomas R. & Perry, George L.W., 2018. "Assessing the performance of common landscape connectivity metrics using a virtual ecologist approach," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 367(C), pages 13-23.
    4. Colbach, Nathalie & Monod, Hervé & Lavigne, Claire, 2009. "A simulation study of the medium-term effects of field patterns on cross-pollination rates in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.)," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(5), pages 662-672.
    5. Antoci, Angelo & Iannucci, Gianluca & Rocchi, Benedetto & Ticci, Elisa, 2023. "The land allocation game: Externalities and evolutionary competition," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 124-133.
    6. Ceddia, M. Graziano & Bartlett, Mark & Perrings, Charles, 2008. "Policies for the regulation of coexistence between GM and conventional crops," 2008 International Congress, August 26-29, 2008, Ghent, Belgium 44193, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    7. Gray, Emily & Ancev, Tihomir & Drynan, Ross, 2011. "Coexistence of GM and non-GM crops with endogenously determined separation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(12), pages 2486-2493.
    8. Shyama V. Ramani & Mhamed-Ali El-Aroui, 2020. "On application of the precautionary principle to ban GMVs: an evolutionary model of new seed technology integration," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 1243-1266, September.
    9. Ceddia, Michele Graziano & Bartlett, Mark & Lucia, Caterina De & Perrings, Charles, 2011. "On the regulation of spatial externalities: coexistence between GM and conventional crops in the EU and the ‘newcomer principle’," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 55(1), pages 1-18.
    10. Demont, Matty & Dillen, Koen & Daems, Wim & Sausse, Christophe & Tollens, Eric & Mathijs, Erik, 2009. "On the proportionality of EU spatial ex ante coexistence regulations," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 508-518, December.
    11. Le Ber, F. & Lavigne, C. & Adamczyk, K. & Angevin, F. & Colbach, N. & Mari, J.-F. & Monod, H., 2009. "Neutral modelling of agricultural landscapes by tessellation methods—Application for gene flow simulation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(24), pages 3536-3545.
    12. Wang, Qian & Malanson, George P., 2008. "Spatial hyperdynamism in a post-disturbance simulated forest," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 215(4), pages 337-344.
    13. Hoyle, Martin & Cresswell, James E., 2009. "Maximum feasible distance of windborne cross-pollination in Brassica napus: A ‘mass budget’ model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(8), pages 1090-1097.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:220:y:2009:i:24:p:3589-3598. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.