IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v220y2009i15p1735-1744.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of discrete host–parasitoid models for diamondback moth and Diadegma semiclausum field time population density series

Author

Listed:
  • Tonnang, Henri E.Z.
  • Nedorezov, Lev V.
  • Owino, John O.
  • Ochanda, Horace
  • Löhr, Bernhard

Abstract

The performance of discrete mathematical models to describe the population dynamics of diamondback moth (DBM) (Plutella xylostella L.) and its parasitoid Diadegma semiclausum was investigated. The parameter values for several well-known models (Nicholson–Bailey, Hassell and Varley, Beddington, Free and Lawton, May, Holling type 2, 3 and Getz and Mills functional responses) were estimated. The models were tested on 20 consecutive sets of time series data collected at 14 days interval for pest and parasitoid populations obtained from a highland cabbage growing area in eastern Kenya. Model parameters were estimated from minimized squared difference between the numerical solution of the model equations and the empirical data using Powell's method. Maximum calculated DBM growth rates varied between 0.02 and 0.07. The carrying capacity determined at 16.5 DBM/plant by the Beddington et al. model was within the range of field data. However, all the estimated parameter values relating to the parasitoid, including the instantaneous searching rate (0.07–0.28), per capita searching efficiency (0.20–0.27), search time (5.20–5.33), handling time (0.77–0.90), and parasitism aggregation index (0.33), were well outside the range encountered empirically. All models evaluated for DBM under Durbin–Watson criteria, except the May model, were not autocorrelated with respect to residuals. In contrast, the criteria applied to the parasitoid residuals showed strong autocorrelations. Thus, these models failed to estimate parasitoid dynamics. We conclude that the interactions of the DBM with its parasitoid cannot be explained by any of the models tested. Two factors may be associated with this failure. First, the parasitoid in this integrated biological control system may not be playing a major role in regulating DBM population. Second, and perhaps more likely, poor correlations reflect gross inadequacies in the theoretical assumptions that underlie the existing models.

Suggested Citation

  • Tonnang, Henri E.Z. & Nedorezov, Lev V. & Owino, John O. & Ochanda, Horace & Löhr, Bernhard, 2009. "Evaluation of discrete host–parasitoid models for diamondback moth and Diadegma semiclausum field time population density series," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(15), pages 1735-1744.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:220:y:2009:i:15:p:1735-1744
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.04.012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380009002646
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.04.012?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tonnang, Henri E.Z. & Nedorezov, Lev V. & Ochanda, Horace & Owino, John & Löhr, Bernhard, 2009. "Assessing the impact of biological control of Plutella xylostella through the application of Lotka–Volterra model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(1), pages 60-70.
    2. Deng, Bo, 2008. "The Time Invariance Principle, the absence of ecological chaos, and a fundamental pitfall of discrete modeling," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 215(4), pages 287-292.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tonnang, Henri E.Z. & Hervé, Bisseleua D.B. & Biber-Freudenberger, Lisa & Salifu, Daisy & Subramanian, Sevgan & Ngowi, Valentine B. & Guimapi, Ritter Y.A. & Anani, Bruce & Kakmeni, Francois M.M. & Aff, 2017. "Advances in crop insect modelling methods—Towards a whole system approach," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 354(C), pages 88-103.
    2. Marzloff, Martin P. & Johnson, Craig R. & Little, L. Rich & Soulié, Jean-Christophe & Ling, Scott D. & Frusher, Stewart D., 2013. "Sensitivity analysis and pattern-oriented validation of TRITON, a model with alternative community states: Insights on temperate rocky reefs dynamics," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 258(C), pages 16-32.
    3. Molter, Alexandre & Bezerra, João I.M. & Rafikova, Elvira & Nava, Dori E. & Rafikov, Marat, 2023. "Dynamics and biological control of the sugarcane borer with two parasitoids," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 481(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:220:y:2009:i:15:p:1735-1744. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.