IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v216y2008i3p409-414.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimated home ranges can misrepresent habitat relationships on patchy landscapes

Author

Listed:
  • Mitchell, Michael S.
  • Powell, Roger A.

Abstract

Home ranges of animals are generally structured by the selective use of resource-bearing patches that comprise habitat. Based on this concept, home ranges of animals estimated from location data are commonly used to infer habitat relationships. Because home ranges estimated from animal locations are largely continuous in space, the resource-bearing patches selected by an animal from a fragmented distribution of patches would be difficult to discern; unselected patches included in the home range estimate would bias an understanding of important habitat relationships. To evaluate potential for this bias, we generated simulated home ranges based on optimal selection of resource-bearing patches across a series of simulated resource distributions that varied in the spatial continuity of resources. For simulated home ranges where selected patches were spatially disjunct, we included interstitial, unselected cells most likely to be traveled by an animal moving among selected patches. We compared characteristics of the simulated home ranges with and without interstitial patches to evaluate how insights derived from field estimates can differ from actual characteristics of home ranges, depending on patchiness of landscapes. Our results showed that contiguous home range estimates could lead to misleading insights on the quality, size, resource content, and efficiency of home ranges, proportional to the spatial discontinuity of resource-bearing patches. We conclude the potential bias of including unselected, largely irrelevant patches in the field estimates of home ranges of animals can be high, particularly for home range estimators that assume uniform use of space within home range boundaries. Thus, inferences about the habitat relationships that ultimately define an animal's home range can be misleading where animals occupy landscapes with patchily distributed resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Mitchell, Michael S. & Powell, Roger A., 2008. "Estimated home ranges can misrepresent habitat relationships on patchy landscapes," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 216(3), pages 409-414.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:216:y:2008:i:3:p:409-414
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.05.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380008002238
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.05.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Blackwell, P.G., 2007. "Heterogeneity, patchiness and correlation of resources," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 207(2), pages 349-355.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Downs, Joni A. & Heller, Justin H. & Loraamm, Rebecca & Stein, Dana Oppenheim & McDaniel, Cassandra & Onorato, Dave, 2012. "Accuracy of home range estimators for homogeneous and inhomogeneous point patterns," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 66-73.
    2. Sells, Sarah N. & Mitchell, Michael S., 2020. "The economics of territory selection," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 438(C).
    3. Robert E Kenward & Eduardo M Arraut & Peter A Robertson & Sean S Walls & Nicholas M Casey & Nicholas J Aebischer, 2018. "Resource-Area-Dependence Analysis: Inferring animal resource needs from home-range and mapping data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-20, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Na & Jing, Yong-Cai & Liu, Cheng-Yu & Li, Yao & Shen, Jing, 2016. "A cellular automaton model for grasshopper population dynamics in Inner Mongolia steppe habitats," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 329(C), pages 5-17.
    2. Sadchatheeswaran, Saachi & Branch, George M. & Shannon, Lynne J. & Coll, Marta & Steenbeek, Jeroen, 2021. "A novel approach to explicitly model the spatiotemporal impacts of structural complexity created by alien ecosystem engineers in a marine benthic environment," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 459(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:216:y:2008:i:3:p:409-414. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.