IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v204y2007i1p180-192.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Use of habitat-contamination spatial correlation to determine when to perform a spatially explicit ecological risk assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Purucker, S.T.
  • Welsh, C.J.E.
  • Stewart, R.N.
  • Starzec, P.

Abstract

Anthropogenic contamination is typically distributed heterogeneously through space. This spatial structure can have different effects on the cumulative doses of wildlife exposed to contamination within the environment. These effects are accentuated when individual organisms pursue different movement strategies, and movement strategies can be affected by how individual organisms and species value habitat. Habitat quality is often neglected when ecological risk assessments are performed, despite evidence that inclusion of a quantitative habitat measure can have a significant effect on the overall exposure estimate. We couple an exposure model with habitat data to examine the interactions between habitat preferences, the spatial distribution of contamination, and the resulting impact on dose estimates. Dose distributions are constructed for pronghorn (Antilocapra americana) exposed to fluoride when foraging on desert sagebrush. The results show the magnitude of the difference between simulated doses when foraging concentrations are positively or negatively correlated with different spatial distributions of habitat preferences. Mean estimated exposures obtained from non-spatial versus spatial methods can vary by a factor greater than two, and variation within the movement model, due to different habitat preferences, can vary by an order of magnitude. Such differences in calculated exposures can change a remediation decision from no-action to remediation, or vice-versa, and impact the remedial design when cleanup is required. In addition, information concerning which endpoint species are more or less likely to be exposed to chemical contamination in a given spatial setting can be used by stakeholders in the endpoint selection process. Results presented here are generally applicable to other situations where terrestrial wildlife is exposed to chemical contaminants. These simple model results demonstrate that examining the strength of the spatial correlation between habitat preference and contaminant data can be quickly used to determine when the implementation of a spatially explicit ecological risk assessment is useful.

Suggested Citation

  • Purucker, S.T. & Welsh, C.J.E. & Stewart, R.N. & Starzec, P., 2007. "Use of habitat-contamination spatial correlation to determine when to perform a spatially explicit ecological risk assessment," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 204(1), pages 180-192.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:204:y:2007:i:1:p:180-192
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.12.032
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380007000038
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.12.032?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Terry W. Schulz & Susan Griffin, 2001. "Practical Methods for Meeting Remediation Goals at Hazardous Waste Sites," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(1), pages 43-52, February.
    2. Glenn W. Suter II & Barney W. Cornaby & Charles T. Hadden & Ruth N. Hull & Mark Stack & Fred A. Zafran, 1995. "An Approach for Balancing Health and Ecological Risks at Hazardous Waste Sites," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(2), pages 221-231, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stillman, Richard A., 2008. "MORPH—An individual-based model to predict the effect of environmental change on foraging animal populations," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 216(3), pages 265-276.
    2. Kuan, A. Carmen & DeGrandi-Hoffman, Gloria & Curry, Robert J. & Garber, Kristina V. & Kanarek, Andrew R. & Snyder, Marcia N. & Wolfe, Kurt L. & Purucker, S. Thomas, 2018. "Sensitivity analyses for simulating pesticide impacts on honey bee colonies," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 376(C), pages 15-27.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Patrick Hofstetter & Jane C. Bare & James K. Hammitt & Patricia A. Murphy & Glenn E. Rice, 2002. "Tools for Comparative Analysis of Alternatives: Competing or Complementary Perspectives?," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(5), pages 833-851, October.
    2. D.C. Kocher & F.O. Hoffman, 1996. "Comment on “An Approach for Balancing Health and Ecological Risks at Hazardous Waste Sites”," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(3), pages 295-297, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:204:y:2007:i:1:p:180-192. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.