The probability of a Condorcet winner with a small number of voters
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
References listed on IDEAS
- William Gehrlein & Peter Fishburn, 1976. "Condorcet's paradox and anonymous preference profiles," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 1-18, June.
- Gehrlein, William V, 1990. "Probability Calculations for Transitivity of Simple Majority Rule with Anonymous Voters," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 66(3), pages 253-259, September.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Regenwetter, Michel & Grofman, Bernard & Marley, A. A. J., 2002. "On the model dependence of majority preference relations reconstructed from ballot or survey data," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 451-466, July.
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.- Gehrlein, William V., 2001. "Condorcet winners on four candidates with anonymous voters," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 71(3), pages 335-340, June.
- Mostapha Diss & Eric Kamwa & Issofa Moyouwou & Hatem Smaoui, 2021.
"Condorcet Efficiency of General Weighted Scoring Rules Under IAC: Indifference and Abstention,"
Studies in Choice and Welfare, in: Mostapha Diss & Vincent Merlin (ed.), Evaluating Voting Systems with Probability Models, pages 55-73,
Springer.
- Mostapha Diss & Issofa Moyouwou & Hatem Smaoui & Eric Kamwa, 2021. "Condorcet efficiency of general weighted scoring rules under IAC: indifference and abstention," Post-Print hal-02196387, HAL.
- Gehrlein, William V. & Moyouwou, Issofa & Lepelley, Dominique, 2013.
"The impact of voters’ preference diversity on the probability of some electoral outcomes,"
Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 66(3), pages 352-365.
- William V. Gehrlein & Issofa Moyouwou & Dominique Lepelley, 2013. "The impact of voters’ preference diversity on the probability of some electoral outcomes," Post-Print hal-01243417, HAL.
- Dominique Lepelley & Fabrice Valognes, 1999. "On the Kim and Roush Voting Procedure," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 109-123, March.
- William Gehrlein, 2002. "Condorcet's paradox and the likelihood of its occurrence: different perspectives on balanced preferences ," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 52(2), pages 171-199, March.
- Yuliya A. Veselova, 2020. "Does Incomplete Information Reduce Manipulability?," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 523-548, June.
- Sébastien Courtin & Boniface Mbih & Issofa Moyouwou, 2014.
"Are Condorcet procedures so bad according to the reinforcement axiom?,"
Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 42(4), pages 927-940, April.
- Sébastien Courtin & Boniface Mbih & Issofa Moyouwou, 2012. "Are Condorcet procedures so bad according to the reinforcement axiom?," THEMA Working Papers 2012-37, THEMA (THéorie Economique, Modélisation et Applications), Université de Cergy-Pontoise.
- Sébastien Courtin & Boniface Mbih & Issofa Moyouwou, 2014. "Are Condorcet procedures so bad according to the reinforcement axiom?," Post-Print hal-00914870, HAL.
- Mostapha Diss, 2015.
"Strategic manipulability of self-selective social choice rules,"
Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 229(1), pages 347-376, June.
- Mostapha Diss, 2013. "Strategic manipulability of self-selective social choice rules," Working Papers halshs-00785366, HAL.
- Mostapha Diss, 2013. "Strategic manipulability of self-selective social choice rules," Working Papers 1302, Groupe d'Analyse et de Théorie Economique Lyon St-Étienne (GATE Lyon St-Étienne), Université de Lyon.
- Mostapha Diss, 2015. "Strategic manipulability of self-selective social choice rules," Post-Print halshs-01136401, HAL.
- Diss, Mostapha & Tsvelikhovskiy, Boris, 2021.
"Manipulable outcomes within the class of scoring voting rules,"
Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 11-18.
- Mostapha Diss & Boris Tsvelikhovskiy, 2019. "Manipulable outcomes within the class of scoring voting rules," Papers 1911.09173, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2020.
- Mostapha Diss & Boris Tsvelikhovskiy, 2021. "Manipulable outcomes within the class of scoring voting rules," Post-Print hal-04419927, HAL.
- Mostapha Diss & Boris Tsvelikhovskiy, 2020. "Manipulable outcomes within the class of scoring voting rules," Working Papers 2020-08, CRESE.
- Mostapha Diss & Boris Tsvelikhovskiy, 2024. "Manipulable outcomes within the class of scoring voting rules," Working Papers hal-04543626, HAL.
- Mostapha Diss & Eric Kamwa & Issofa Moyouwou & Hatem Smaoui, 2019. "Condorcet efficiency of general weighted scoring rules under IAC: indifference and abstention," Working Papers hal-02196387, HAL.
- Lepelley, Dominique & Chantreuil, Frederic & Berg, Sven, 1996.
"The likelihood of monotonicity paradoxes in run-off elections,"
Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 133-146, June.
- Dominique Lepelley & Frederic Chantreuil & Sven Berg, 1996. "The likehood of monotonicity paradoxes in run-off elections," Post-Print hal-01600172, HAL.
- Tomas J. McIntee, 2017. "A geometric model of sensitivity of multistage elections to change," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 49(1), pages 89-115, June.
- Mostapha Diss & Eric Kamwa & Abdelmonaim Tlidi, 2018.
"A Note on the Likelihood of the Absolute Majority Paradoxes,"
Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 38(4), pages 1727-1734.
- Mostapha Diss & Eric Kamwa & Abdelmonaim Tlidi, 2018. "A Note on the Likelihood of the Absolute Majority Paradoxes," Post-Print hal-01896273, HAL.
- Mostapha Diss & Eric Kamwa, 2019.
"Simulations in Models of Preference Aggregation,"
Working Papers
hal-02424936, HAL.
- Mostapha Diss & Eric Kamwa, 2020. "Simulations in Models of Preference Aggregation," Post-Print hal-02424936, HAL.
- Winfried Bruns & Bogdan Ichim & Christof Söger, 2019. "Computations of volumes and Ehrhart series in four candidates elections," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 280(1), pages 241-265, September.
- Mostapha Diss & Michele Gori, 2022.
"Majority properties of positional social preference correspondences,"
Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 92(2), pages 319-347, March.
- Mostapha Diss & Michele Gori, 2020. "Majority properties of positional social preference correspondences," Working Papers 2020-06, CRESE.
- Mostapha Diss & Michele Gori, 2021. "Majority properties of positional social preference correspondences," Post-Print hal-04419912, HAL.
- Mostapha Diss & Michele Gori, 2020. "Majority properties of positional social preference correspondences," Working Papers hal-04251726, HAL.
- Mostapha Diss & Patrizia Pérez-Asurmendi, 2015.
"Consistent collective decisions under majorities based on difference of votes,"
Working Papers
1533, Groupe d'Analyse et de Théorie Economique Lyon St-Étienne (GATE Lyon St-Étienne), Université de Lyon.
- Mostapha Diss, 2016. "Consistent collective decisions under majorities based on difference of votes," Post-Print halshs-01196091, HAL.
- Diss, Mostapha & Louichi, Ahmed & Merlin, Vincent & Smaoui, Hatem, 2012.
"An example of probability computations under the IAC assumption: The stability of scoring rules,"
Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 64(1), pages 57-66.
- Mostapha Diss & Ahmed Louichi & Vincent Merlin & H. Smaoui, 2012. "An example of probability computations under the IAC assumption: The stability of scoring rules," Post-Print halshs-00667660, HAL.
- Lepelley, Dominique & Gehrlein, William V., 2000. "Strong Condorcet efficiency of scoring rules," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 68(2), pages 157-164, August.
- Diss, Mostapha & Dougherty, Keith & Heckelman, Jac C., 2023.
"When ties are possible: Weak Condorcet winners and Arrovian rationality,"
Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 128-136.
- Mostapha Diss & Keith Dougherty & Jac Heckelman, 2023. "When ties are possible: Weak Condorcet winners and Arrovian rationality," Post-Print hal-04419865, HAL.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecolet:v:59:y:1998:i:3:p:317-321. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolet .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.