IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecolet/v247y2025ics0165176524005895.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bias in estimating returns to tenure: The impact of monopsony power

Author

Listed:
  • Snell, Andy
  • Thomas, Jonathan P.
  • Martins, Pedro

Abstract

This note revisits the bias in returns to tenure estimates (RTT) that arises when firm employment and wages comove through firm-specific (FS) wage shocks — shocks to wages that likely occur in the presence of monopsony power(MP). In an earlier paper, Snell et al. (2018), found that adding firm-year fixed effects to a Mincer regression for workers in a small sample of firms in German and Portuguese panel data raised the estimated RTT schedules by about 30%. Here we re-examine the sign and magnitude of this bias using the universe of workers in Portugal. We find the bias remains negative and large. We then split the data into low and high labour market concentration firms to examine the role MP plays in these results. We find that the RTT bias arising from FS wage shocks is larger in firms with high MP than low MP. The results reinforce the need to control for FS wage shocks in RTT estimation exercises especially where comparisons across different workers in different firms are made.

Suggested Citation

  • Snell, Andy & Thomas, Jonathan P. & Martins, Pedro, 2025. "Bias in estimating returns to tenure: The impact of monopsony power," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecolet:v:247:y:2025:i:c:s0165176524005895
    DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2024.112105
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165176524005895
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.econlet.2024.112105?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Equal treatment; Returns to tenure; Returns to seniority;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • E32 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles - - - Business Fluctuations; Cycles
    • J41 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Particular Labor Markets - - - Labor Contracts

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecolet:v:247:y:2025:i:c:s0165176524005895. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolet .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.