IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecolec/v68y2009i6p1711-1722.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modelling of forest conversion planning with an adaptive simulation-optimization approach and simultaneous consideration of the values of timber, carbon and biodiversity

Author

Listed:
  • Yousefpour, Rasoul
  • Hanewinkel, Marc

Abstract

The paper presents a combined simulation-optimization approach to model forest conversion planning taking the values of timber, carbon and biodiversity into account. The development of a virtual age-class forest was predicted by adopting a single tree forest growth tool, "TreeGrOSS". The effects of different conversion regimes with continuous variables describing silvicultural prescriptions were monitored for a finite conversion period of forty years in stand level. Dynamic linear programming was employed to adaptively solve the multi-period large-scale optimization problem of a forest enterprise encompassing five different age-classes of pure Norway spruce (Picea abies, L. Karst) stands. The global net present values of biodiversity, carbon sequestration and timber production along with the wood even flow constraint, were considered simultaneously. The obtained optimal sylvicultural pathway differed not only among different stands but also sometimes within a given stand. The integration of the utility of biodiversity into the optimization procedure favoured conversion strategies that foresee the establishment of beech regeneration in all forest stands. The simultaneous consideration of all mentioned utilities resulted in a global utility of 27451[euro]/ha consisting of 14499 (53%), 3412 (12%), 764 (3%), and 8777 (32%)[euro]/ha for the value of timber, carbon, biodiversity, and standing volume respectively. The sensitivity analysis showed that the threshold from which no major changes in the relevant silvicultural parameters occurred was observed at 30[euro]/t carbon price with an interest rate of 2%.

Suggested Citation

  • Yousefpour, Rasoul & Hanewinkel, Marc, 2009. "Modelling of forest conversion planning with an adaptive simulation-optimization approach and simultaneous consideration of the values of timber, carbon and biodiversity," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(6), pages 1711-1722, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:68:y:2009:i:6:p:1711-1722
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921-8009(08)00535-1
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Teeter, Lawrence & Somers, Greg & Sullivan, Jay, 1993. "Optimal forest harvest decisions: A stochastic dynamic programming approach," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 42(1-2), pages 73-84.
    2. Peter Lohmander, 2007. "Adaptive Optimization of Forest Management in A Stochastic World," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Andres Weintraub & Carlos Romero & Trond Bjørndal & Rafael Epstein & Jaime Miranda (ed.), Handbook Of Operations Research In Natural Resources, chapter 0, pages 525-543, Springer.
    3. Hayri Önal, 1997. "Trade-off between Structural Diversity and Economic Objectives in Forest Management," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 79(3), pages 1001-1012.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dymond, Caren Christine & Giles-Hansen, Krysta & Asante, Patrick, 2020. "The forest mitigation-adaptation nexus: Economic benefits of novel planting regimes," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    2. Zamora-Pereira, Juan Carlos & Hanewinkel, Marc & Yousefpour, Rasoul, 2023. "Robust management strategies promoting ecological resilience and economic efficiency of a mixed conifer-broadleaf forest in Southwest Germany under the risk of severe drought," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    3. Louis Anthony (Tony) Cox, 2012. "Confronting Deep Uncertainties in Risk Analysis," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(10), pages 1607-1629, October.
    4. Wu, Tong & Lawell, C.Y. Cynthia Lin & Just, David R. & Zhao, Jiancheng & Fei, Zhangjun & Wei, Qiang, 2022. "Optimal Forest Management for Interdependent Products: A Nested Dynamic Bioeconomic Model and Application to Bamboo," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322164, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    5. Dong, Lingbo & Lu, Wei & Liu, Zhaogang, 2018. "Developing alternative forest spatial management plans when carbon and timber values are considered: A real case from northeastern China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 385(C), pages 45-57.
    6. Lu, Ze-Yu & Li, Wen-Hua & Xie, Bai-Chen & Shang, Li-Feng, 2015. "Study on China’s wind power development path—Based on the target for 2030," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 197-208.
    7. Yousefpour, Rasoul & Didion, Markus & Jacobsen, Jette B. & Meilby, Henrik & Hengeveld, Geerten M. & Schelhaas, Mart-Jan & Thorsen, Bo J., 2015. "Modelling of adaptation to climate change and decision-makers behaviours for the Veluwe forest area in the Netherlands," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 1-10.
    8. Zhou, Mo, 2015. "Adapting sustainable forest management to climate policy uncertainty: A conceptual framework," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 66-74.
    9. Hilder André Bezerra Farias & Sérgio Luiz de Medeiros Rivero & Márcia Jucá Teixeira Diniz, 2017. "Negative incentives and sustainability in the amazonian logging industry [Negative incentives and sustainability in the amazonian logging industry]," Nova Economia, Economics Department, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (Brazil), vol. 27(3), pages 363-391, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bertomeu, M. & Romero, C., 2001. "Managing forest biodiversity: a zero-one goal programming approach," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 68(3), pages 197-213, June.
    2. Rakotoarison, Hanitra & Loisel, Patrice, 2016. "The Faustmann model under storm risk and price uncertainty: A case study of European beech in Northwestern France," MPRA Paper 85114, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Fooks, Jacob R. & Messer, Kent D., 2012. "Maximizing conservation and in-kind cost share: Applying Goal Programming to forest protection," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(3), pages 207-217.
    4. Shone, Bryan M. & Caviglia-Harris, Jill L., 2006. "Quantifying and comparing the value of non-timber forest products in the Amazon," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(2), pages 249-267, June.
    5. Soleiman MOHAMMADI LIMAEI & Peter LOHMANDER & Leif OLSSON, 2017. "Dynamic growth models for continuous cover multi-species forestry in Iranian Caspian forests," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 63(11), pages 519-529.
    6. Pukkala, Timo, 2016. "Plenterwald, Dauerwald, or clearcut?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 125-134.
    7. Emina Krcmar & G. Cornelis van Kooten & Ilan Vertinsky, 2004. "Managing Forests for Multiple Tradeoffs: Compromising on Timber, Carbon, and Biodiversity Objectives," Working Papers 2004-02, University of Victoria, Department of Economics, Resource Economics and Policy Analysis Research Group.
    8. Naumov, Vladimir & Angelstam, Per & Elbakidze, Marine, 2016. "Barriers and bridges for intensified wood production in Russia: Insights from the environmental history of a regional logging frontier," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 1-10.
    9. Boltz, Frederick & Douglas, R. Carter & Michael, G. Jacobson, 2002. "Shadow pricing diversity in U. S. national forests," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 8(3), pages 185-197.
    10. Susaeta, Andres & Gong, Peichen, 2019. "Economic viability of longleaf pine management in the Southeastern United States," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 14-23.
    11. Miguel A. Lejeune & Janne Kettunen, 2017. "Managing Reliability and Stability Risks in Forest Harvesting," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 19(4), pages 620-638, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:68:y:2009:i:6:p:1711-1722. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolecon .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.