IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecolec/v40y2002i2p181-198.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An economic-ecological model of urban growth and urban externalities: empirical evidence from Italy

Author

Listed:
  • Capello, Roberta
  • Faggian, Alessandra

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Capello, Roberta & Faggian, Alessandra, 2002. "An economic-ecological model of urban growth and urban externalities: empirical evidence from Italy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 181-198, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:40:y:2002:i:2:p:181-198
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921-8009(01)00252-X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. D S Dendrinos & H Mullally, 1983. "Optimum Control in Nonlinear Ecological Dynamics of Metropolitan Areas," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 15(4), pages 543-550, April.
    2. Nijkamp, P. & Reggiani, A., 1987. "A new methodology for the analysis of dynamic spatial interaction models," Serie Research Memoranda 0070, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    3. Jonathan P. Goldstein, 1999. "Predator–Prey Model Estimates of the Cyclical Profit Squeeze," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(2), pages 139-173, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Puliafito, Salvador Enrique & Puliafito, José Luis & Grand, Mariana Conte, 2008. "Modeling population dynamics and economic growth as competing species: An application to CO2 global emissions," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(3), pages 602-615, April.
    2. Ewing, Bradley T. & Riggs, Kent & Ewing, Keith L., 2007. "Time series analysis of a predator-prey system: Application of VAR and generalized impulse response function," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(3), pages 605-612, January.
    3. Doris A. Behrens & Olivia Koland & Ulrike Leopold-Wildburger, 2018. "Why local air pollution is more than daily peaks: modelling policies in a city in order to avoid premature deaths," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 26(2), pages 265-286, June.
    4. Hailiang Ma & Chenling Shi & Nan-Ting Chou, 2016. "China’s Water Utilization Efficiency: An Analysis with Environmental Considerations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-15, May.
    5. Otwin Becker & Ulrike Leopold-Wildburger, 2020. "Optimal dynamic control of predator–prey models," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 28(2), pages 425-440, June.
    6. Fang, Wei & An, Haizhong & Li, Huajiao & Gao, Xiangyun & Sun, Xiaoqi & Zhong, Weiqiong, 2017. "Accessing on the sustainability of urban ecological-economic systems by means of a coupled emergy and system dynamics model: A case study of Beijing," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 326-337.
    7. Meiyu Liu & Guofeng Zhang & Du Yang, 2022. "Do the National Key Ecological Function Zones Promote Green Development? Evidence from the Yanshan–Taihang Mountainous Area in Hebei Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-19, August.
    8. Inna MANAEVA & Alexandra KANISHTEVA, 2017. "Estimation Of Factors For Social And Economic Inequality Of Russia'S Towns," Regional Science Inquiry, Hellenic Association of Regional Scientists, vol. 0(2), pages 147-158, December.
    9. Helmut Herwartz, 2022. "Modelling interaction patterns in a predator-prey system of two freshwater organisms in discrete time: an identified structural VAR approach," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 31(1), pages 63-85, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Araujo, Ricardo Azevedo & Dávila-Fernández, Marwil J. & Moreira, Helmar Nunes, 2019. "Some new insights on the empirics of Goodwin's growth-cycle model," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 42-54.
    2. Puliafito, Salvador Enrique & Puliafito, José Luis & Grand, Mariana Conte, 2008. "Modeling population dynamics and economic growth as competing species: An application to CO2 global emissions," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(3), pages 602-615, April.
    3. Tarassow, Artur, 2010. "The empirical relevance of Goodwin’s business cycle model for the US economy," MPRA Paper 21012, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Doris A. Behrens & Olivia Koland & Ulrike Leopold-Wildburger, 2018. "Why local air pollution is more than daily peaks: modelling policies in a city in order to avoid premature deaths," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 26(2), pages 265-286, June.
    5. Mohun, Simon & Veneziani, Roberto, 2006. "Goodwin cycles and the U.S. economy, 1948-2004," MPRA Paper 30444, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Marcio Santetti, 2023. "A time-varying finance-led model for U.S. business cycles," Papers 2310.05153, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2024.
    7. Ivan Mendieta‐Muñoz & Doğuhan Sündal, 2022. "Business cycles, financial conditions, and nonlinearities," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(2), pages 343-383, May.
    8. Nijkamp, P. & Reggiani, A., 1990. "Strategic long-term transportation planning and dynamic transportation models : a life cycle interpretation," Serie Research Memoranda 0062, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    9. Matheus R. Grasselli & Aditya Maheshwari, 2018. "Testing a Goodwin model with general capital accumulation rate," Papers 1803.01536, arXiv.org.
    10. Nijkamp, P. & Reggiani, A., 1989. "Chaos theory and spatial dynamics," Serie Research Memoranda 0044, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    11. Engelbert Stockhammer & Robert Stehrer, 2011. "Goodwin or Kalecki in Demand? Functional Income Distribution and Aggregate Demand in the Short Run," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 43(4), pages 506-522, December.
    12. Deepankar Basu & Ying Chen & Jong-seok Oh, 2013. "Class struggle and economic fluctuations: VAR analysis of the post-war US economy," International Review of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(5), pages 575-596, September.
    13. Ariza Ruiz, Efrén Danilo & Garza, Nestor, 2024. "The unfolding of neoliberalism in economics curricula and scholarships: Colombia as a case study," ZÖSS-Discussion Papers 104, University of Hamburg, Centre for Economic and Sociological Studies (CESS/ZÖSS).
    14. Santetti, Marcio & Nikiforos, Michalis & von Arnim, Rudiger, 2024. "Growth, cycles, and residential investment," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 313-327.
    15. Manfredi, Piero & Fanti, Luciano, 2006. "The complex effects of demographic heterogeneity on the interaction between the economy and population," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 148-173, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:40:y:2002:i:2:p:181-198. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolecon .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.