IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v44y2014icp114-119.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Families in waiting: Adult stakeholder perceptions of family court

Author

Listed:
  • Shdaimah, Corey
  • Summers, Alicia

Abstract

This study examines perspectives of adults (primarily parents) who participated in juvenile delinquency or dependency hearings at the family division of the Baltimore City Circuit Court. Most respondents understood the court process, felt that their voices were heard, and were satisfied with their treatment. While the majority reported fair treatment, parents were more likely than non-parents to report that judges were sometimes or usually unfair. Respondents with the same judge were more likely than respondents with multiple judges to feel that the judge cared about how they and their children were doing and less likely to feel that the judge does not know enough about the case to make a fair decision. These findings provide support for the one family, one judge docketing system, which was implemented in Baltimore's dependency cases. Observations and open-ended responses revealed concern about the chaos and discomfort of the court waiting areas. Concerns included lack of seating, space or activities for young children, and food as well as stress, confusion, and long wait times. Study findings call for more attention to the environment, which impacts stakeholder experiences of and ability to function optimally in the court process.

Suggested Citation

  • Shdaimah, Corey & Summers, Alicia, 2014. "Families in waiting: Adult stakeholder perceptions of family court," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 114-119.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:44:y:2014:i:c:p:114-119
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.06.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740914002151
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.06.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Buckler, Kevin & Cullen, Francis T. & Unnever, James D., 2007. "Citizen assessment of local criminal courts: Does fairness matter?," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 524-536.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shdaimah, Corey S. & Alexander, Ivana T., 2018. "Foster parents’ experience of dependency court: Laying the groundwork for engagement," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 265-273.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:44:y:2014:i:c:p:114-119. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.