IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v29y2007i9p1179-1188.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A procedure for assessing parents' capacity for change in child protection cases

Author

Listed:
  • Harnett, Paul H.

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Harnett, Paul H., 2007. "A procedure for assessing parents' capacity for change in child protection cases," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(9), pages 1179-1188, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:29:y:2007:i:9:p:1179-1188
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190-7409(07)00074-6
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Munro, Eileen, 2004. "A simpler way to understand the results of risk assessment instruments," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 26(9), pages 873-883, September.
    2. Budd, Karen S., 2005. "Assessing parenting capacity in a child welfare context," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 429-444, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Platt, Dendy & Riches, Katie & Wijedasa, Dinithi & Wood, Marsha, 2020. "Assessment of parental capacity to change where children may be at risk of harm: Evaluation of the C-Change pilot project," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    2. van der Asdonk, Sabine & van Berkel, Sheila R. & de Haan, Whitney D. & van IJzendoorn, Marinus H. & Schuengel, Carlo & Alink, Lenneke R.A., 2019. "Improving decision-making agreement in child protection cases by using information regarding parents' response to an intervention: A vignette study," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    3. Platt, Dendy & Riches, Katie, 2016. "Assessing parental capacity to change: The missing jigsaw piece in the assessment of a child's welfare?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 141-148.
    4. Davidson-Arad, Bilha & Kaznelson, Hagith, 2010. "Comparison of parents' and social workers' assessments of the quality of life of children at risk," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(5), pages 711-719, May.
    5. Millett, Lina Sapokaite & Ben-David, Vered & Jonson-Reid, Melissa & Echele, Greg & Moussette, Pam & Atkins, Valerie, 2016. "Understanding change among multi-problem families: Learnings from a formative program assessment," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 176-183.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shlonsky, Aron & Wagner, Dennis, 2005. "The next step: Integrating actuarial risk assessment and clinical judgment into an evidence-based practice framework in CPS case management," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 409-427, April.
    2. Gambrill, Eileen D., 2005. "Decision making in child welfare: Errors and their context," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 347-352, April.
    3. van der Asdonk, Sabine & van Berkel, Sheila R. & de Haan, Whitney D. & van IJzendoorn, Marinus H. & Schuengel, Carlo & Alink, Lenneke R.A., 2019. "Improving decision-making agreement in child protection cases by using information regarding parents' response to an intervention: A vignette study," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    4. Ben-David, Vered, 2011. "Judicial bias in adjudicating the adoption of minors in Israel," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 195-203, January.
    5. Whitcombe-Dobbs, Sarah & Schluter, Philip J. & Tarren-Sweeney, Michael, 2023. "Self-report measures of parental psychosocial functioning did not predict further maltreatment of children involved with child protection services: A small cohort study," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    6. Barbee, Anita P. & Christensen, Dana & Antle, Becky & Wandersman, Abraham & Cahn, Katharine, 2011. "Successful adoption and implementation of a comprehensive casework practice model in a public child welfare agency: Application of the Getting to Outcomes (GTO) model," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 622-633, May.
    7. Mansell, James & Ota, Rissa & Erasmus, Ricus & Marks, Kip, 2011. "Reframing child protection: A response to a constant crisis of confidence in child protection," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(11), pages 2076-2086.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:29:y:2007:i:9:p:1179-1188. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.