IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v23y2001i2p169-199.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Selecting outcome measures for child welfare settings: lessons for use in performance management

Author

Listed:
  • Wells, Susan J.
  • Johnson, Michelle A.

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Wells, Susan J. & Johnson, Michelle A., 2001. "Selecting outcome measures for child welfare settings: lessons for use in performance management," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 169-199, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:23:y:2001:i:2:p:169-199
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190-7409(01)00132-3
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. McDonald, Thomas & Lieberman, Alice & Poertner, John & Hornby, Helaine, 1989. "Child welfare standards for success," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 319-330.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Waldfogel, Jane, 2000. "Child welfare research for the 21st century," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(9-10), pages 681-683.
    2. Poertner, John & McDonald, Thomas P. & Murray, Cyndie, 2000. "Child welfare outcomes revisited," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(9-10), pages 789-810.
    3. Lyle, Charles Gene & Graham, Elliott, 2000. "Looks can be deceiving: Using a risk assessment instrument to evaluate the out-comes of child protection services," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(11-12), pages 935-949.
    4. Waldfogel, Jane, 2000. "Child welfare research: How adequate are the data?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(9-10), pages 705-741.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:23:y:2001:i:2:p:169-199. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.