IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v171y2025ics0190740925000490.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Families’ perspectives on the impact of signs of safety in child protection services through the lens of self-determination theory

Author

Listed:
  • De Clercq, L.
  • Meulewaeter, F.
  • Rowaert, S.
  • Decoene, S.
  • Caffrey, L.
  • Caslor, M.
  • Vandevelde, S.
  • Vanderplasschen, W.

Abstract

The Signs of Safety (SofS) approach has been designed as a strengths- and solution-oriented approach for professional care providers to support families and children referred to Child Protection Services (CPS). Although SofS has been implemented worldwide within statutory and non-statutory child protection practices, research from the perspective of families that evidences the approach’s impact is currently lacking. As previous research has called for more theory-driven impact studies, this study applies Self-Determination Theory (SDT) as a framework to better understand how SofS enables families to experience ‘autonomous’ motivation rather than ‘controlled’ motivation by supporting basic human needs for autonomy, relatedness, and competence. Sixteen parents, minors, and network members from five case studies were interviewed through semi-structured interviews about their experiences with their SofS trajectory in Flanders, Belgium. The results demonstrate that by leveraging SDT and integrating it with the principles of SofS, practice workers can establish a supportive environment that respects family autonomy, promotes collaboration, and encourages self-endorsed goals, ultimately enhancing the safety and well-being of children and families involved in CPS.

Suggested Citation

  • De Clercq, L. & Meulewaeter, F. & Rowaert, S. & Decoene, S. & Caffrey, L. & Caslor, M. & Vandevelde, S. & Vanderplasschen, W., 2025. "Families’ perspectives on the impact of signs of safety in child protection services through the lens of self-determination theory," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:171:y:2025:i:c:s0190740925000490
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2025.108166
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740925000490
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2025.108166?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:171:y:2025:i:c:s0190740925000490. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.