Author
Listed:
- Sprague-Jones, Jessica
- McKenney, Kimberly
- Firman, Casandra
- Susskind, Yve
- Bash, Kirstie
Abstract
Many family service organizations offer services targeted to the needs of families with one or both parents serving in a branch of the armed forces. To support these organizations, we adapted the Protective Factors Survey, 2nd Edition (PFS-2) to capture experiences of military family life and establish the new survey’s reliability and validity. We conducted focus groups with military family members, consulted with experts in field, and reviewed existing research to develop new items. We fielded an online survey with a convenience sample of military family members and civilian caregivers to collect data on new and existing PFS-2 items, which we analyzed for performance with military families compared to civilians, and psychometric characteristics. Our analysis confirmed that original PFS-2 items worked well for military families, and there was not a significant difference between how military and non-military respondents responded to these items. Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed a 5-factor structure, representing protective factor constructs of nurturing and attachment, social support, concrete support, military family life and resilience, and a fifth construct related to program evaluation. The Protective Factors Survey, Military Families (PFS-MF) possesses sound psychometric properties measuring protective factors which support family resilience and reduce the probability of child maltreatment. The PFS-MF fills a gap as a short, free, flexible survey that measures multiple protective factors as they relate to the military experience. It can be used as an evaluation tool to measure program effectiveness, inform needs assessments, make programmatic decisions, and tailor individual services.
Suggested Citation
Sprague-Jones, Jessica & McKenney, Kimberly & Firman, Casandra & Susskind, Yve & Bash, Kirstie, 2025.
"Development of the protective factors Survey, military families (PFS-MF),"
Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:169:y:2025:i:c:s0190740925000143
DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2025.108131
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:169:y:2025:i:c:s0190740925000143. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.