IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v163y2024ics019074092400330x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Caregiver report of adverse childhood events: comparison of self-administered and telephone questionnaires

Author

Listed:
  • Lemons, Jamie
  • Saravanan, Madhumitha
  • Tumin, Dmitry
  • Anyigbo, Chidiogo

Abstract

Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) are traumatic experiences that increase people’s susceptibility to adverse physical health, mental health, and social consequences in adulthood. Screening for ACEs in primary care settings is complicated by a lack of consensus on appropriate methods for identifying exposure to ACEs. It is unclear whether self-report methods could increase disclosure of ACEs as compared to interview-based methods. This study compares data on the prevalence of ACEs from two publicly available surveys conducted on the same population of children’s caregivers: the 2019 Ohio subsample of the web/mail-based National Survey of Children’s Health and the telephone-based 2019 Ohio Medicaid Assessment Survey. We find higher disclosure of caregiver-reported child exposure to ACEs in the telephone interview survey, highlighting the importance of the role of verbal communication in developing a safe and trusting relationship in the disclosure of trauma.

Suggested Citation

  • Lemons, Jamie & Saravanan, Madhumitha & Tumin, Dmitry & Anyigbo, Chidiogo, 2024. "Caregiver report of adverse childhood events: comparison of self-administered and telephone questionnaires," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:163:y:2024:i:c:s019074092400330x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2024.107758
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S019074092400330X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2024.107758?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:163:y:2024:i:c:s019074092400330x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.