IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v160y2024ics0190740924001105.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“Being in the system is really difficult and…I wouldn’t wish it on anybody.” Trauma and the public sector system of care for youth

Author

Listed:
  • Masuda, Taira
  • Helm, Susana

Abstract

Youth involved in public sector services for substance use and other forms of mental health, juvenile justice, foster care, or homelessness report higher rates of trauma compared to the general youth population. We interviewed 26 youth, ages 14–21, with lived experience in public systems of care for the purpose of a state-contracted needs assessment evaluation. Qualitative analysis of these data indicated trauma occurs sequentially vis-à-vis the system of care. Participants experienced family adversity and a lack of social support, which has been defined as pre-system trauma. Because of this pre-system trauma, youth were referred to the public sector system of care. Rather than resolving trauma, system involvement exacerbated existing trauma and introduced new forms of trauma, defined as system-based trauma. Existing policies and practice address pre-system trauma, though there is room for improvement for both pre-system and system-based trauma. The field has yet to reckon fully with system-based trauma and this may be the next transformation for public sector youth services.

Suggested Citation

  • Masuda, Taira & Helm, Susana, 2024. "“Being in the system is really difficult and…I wouldn’t wish it on anybody.” Trauma and the public sector system of care for youth," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:160:y:2024:i:c:s0190740924001105
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2024.107538
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740924001105
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2024.107538?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mia Luluquisen & Lauren Pettis, 2014. "Community engagement for policy and systems change," Community Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(3), pages 252-262, July.
    2. Havlicek, Judy & Lin, Ching-Hsuan & Braun, Michael T., 2016. "Cultivating youth voice through participation in a Foster youth advisory board: Perspectives of facilitators," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 1-10.
    3. Augsberger, Astraea & Springwater, Julie Sweeney & Hilliard-Koshinsky, Grace & Barber, Kelsey & Martinez, Linda Sprague, 2019. "Youth participation in policy advocacy: Examination of a multi-state former and current foster care youth coalition," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    4. Beidas, Rinad S. & Adams, Danielle R. & Kratz, Hilary E. & Jackson, Kamilah & Berkowitz, Steven & Zinny, Arturo & Cliggitt, Lauren Pilar & DeWitt, Kathryn L. & Skriner, Laura & Evans, Arthur, 2016. "Lessons learned while building a trauma-informed public behavioral health system in the City of Philadelphia," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 21-32.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gazit, Matan & Perry-Hazan, Lotem, 2020. "Disadvantaged youth’s participation in collective decision making," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    2. Yunita, Sekar A.W. & Soraya, Emma & Maryudi, Ahmad, 2018. "“We are just cheerleaders”: Youth's views on their participation in international forest-related decision-making fora," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 52-58.
    3. Havlicek, Judy & Curry, Ashley & Villalpando, Fabiola, 2018. "Youth participation in foster youth advisory boards: Perspectives of facilitators," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 255-270.
    4. Paulo Delgado & João M. S. Carvalho & Sílvia Alves, 2023. "Children and Young People’s Participation in decision-making in Foster Care," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 16(1), pages 421-445, February.
    5. Desmond Lartey & Meredith A. Glaser, 2024. "Towards a Sustainable Transport System: Exploring Capacity Building for Active Travel in Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-20, February.
    6. Augsberger, Astraea & Springwater, Julie Sweeney & Hilliard-Koshinsky, Grace & Barber, Kelsey & Martinez, Linda Sprague, 2019. "Youth participation in policy advocacy: Examination of a multi-state former and current foster care youth coalition," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    7. Stevenson Wojciak, Armeda & Simpson, Jessica E. & Tomfohrde, Olivia & Wang, Guanyu, 2024. "Barriers and facilitators of sibling relationships of youth in foster care from an ecological perspective," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    8. Schelbe, Lisa, 2018. "Struggles, successes, and setbacks: Youth aging out of child welfare in a subsidized housing program," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 298-308.
    9. Tsion Berie & Sean A. Kidd & Gregor Wolbring, 2024. "Poverty (Number 1 Goal of the SDG) of Disabled People through Disability Studies and Ability Studies Lenses: A Scoping Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-52, July.
    10. Walker, Janet S. & Masselli, Brianne M. & Blakeslee, Jennifer & Baird, Caitlin & Thorp, Kristin, 2018. "Development and testing of an assessment of youth/young adult voice in agency-level advising and decision making," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 598-605.
    11. Park, Sunggeun (Ethan) & Powers, Jenna & Okpych, Nathanael J. & Courtney, Mark E., 2020. "Predictors of foster youths’ participation in their transitional independent living plan (TILP) development: Calling for collaborative case plan decision-making processes," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    12. Unrau, Yvonne A. & Dawson, Ann & Hamilton, Ronicka D. & Bennett, Jamie L., 2017. "Perceived value of a campus-based college support program by students who aged out of foster care," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 64-73.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:160:y:2024:i:c:s0190740924001105. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.