IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v150y2023ics0190740923002116.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A mixed-method evaluation of Cradle to Kinder: An Australian intensive home visitation program for families experiencing significant disadvantage

Author

Listed:
  • O'Donnell, Renee
  • Savaglio, Melissa
  • Halfpenny, Nick
  • Morris, Heather
  • Miller, Robyn
  • Skouteris, Helen

Abstract

Cradle to Kinder is an Australian intensive, long-term, home visitation program that supports young families experiencing multiple stressors, including poverty, family violence, mental illness, substance use, childhood trauma, intellectual disability, child projection involvement, teenage pregnancy, or social isolation, which places them at high risk of child removal. The program adopts a multidisciplinary, whole-of-family and trauma-informed approach to provide families with long-term case management, practical support and evidence-based therapeutic parenting interventions from pregnancy for up to four years to address these underlying risk factors. The aim of this study was to evaluate: (1) the extent to which families experienced improvements in family, caregiver and infant wellbeing outcomes after 24 months engagement; and (2) caregivers’ experiences of the program. A mixed-method evaluation was employed, which included two components: (1) uncontrolled pre-post quantitative assessment for 57 families using the North Carolina Family Assessment Scale and Brigance Early Child Development Assessment, completed every six months; and (2) qualitative interviews with 14 caregivers engaged in the program. The quantitative findings showed significant improvements in key domains of family functioning, parenting capabilities, infant development, and family preservation. The qualitative results validated these findings as caregivers reported favourable outcomes via participation in the program, including improved parenting skills and confidence, personal wellbeing, and child development. Suggestions for program development included greater support for fathers, increased cultural awareness, and consistency in workers. This mixed-methods study provides support for Cradle to Kinder as a promising model of family support that can improve family functioning, caregiver and child wellbeing, and prevent child removal among families experiencing significant disadvantage. These findings support the ongoing delivery of Cradle to Kinder in Australia to ensure families at greatest risk receive the support they urgently need.

Suggested Citation

  • O'Donnell, Renee & Savaglio, Melissa & Halfpenny, Nick & Morris, Heather & Miller, Robyn & Skouteris, Helen, 2023. "A mixed-method evaluation of Cradle to Kinder: An Australian intensive home visitation program for families experiencing significant disadvantage," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:150:y:2023:i:c:s0190740923002116
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2023.107016
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740923002116
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2023.107016?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Meiksans, Jenna & Arney, Fiona & Flaherty, Rosemaria & Octoman, Olivia & Chong, Alwin & Ward, Fiona & Taylor, Cathy, 2021. "Risk factors identified in prenatal child protection reports," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:150:y:2023:i:c:s0190740923002116. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.