IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v136y2022ics0190740922000780.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An exploration of voluntarily abandoned free health services among children with disabilities in China: An ideological conflict perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Yuan
  • Zhu, Yueqi
  • Qi, Cai Yun
  • Zhang, Qian

Abstract

In terms of protecting children with disabilities, healthcare rights are a crucial issue that cannot be ignored. In China, although the government provides generous health services, children with disabilities abandoning those services is a common phenomenon. Few scholars have directly and systematically studied this important issue. Using a qualitative method, we investigated the experiences and feelings of six service providers and twelve primary caregivers. From an ideological conflict perspective, we have found that China is a social context in which the state-led ideology of egalitarianism and the ideology of developmentalism co-exist but clash at the level of local governments and organizations. We produced two themes: (a) Governance methods arising from developmentalism produce invisible institutional exclusion in the form of non-client-centered tasks, constraints surrounding service costs, competitive welfare development models, and “good” performance chasing; (b) parents operating under developmentalism treat children with disabilities as abnormal, unprofitable, burdensome, and tragic, which encourages the voluntarily abandonment of healthcare services. The interaction of these two themes strengthens the ideological split occurring between them, leading to the widespread deprivation of health rights among children with disabilities. The results of this study call for critical reflections on disability policy implementation under this current conflicting ideology.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Yuan & Zhu, Yueqi & Qi, Cai Yun & Zhang, Qian, 2022. "An exploration of voluntarily abandoned free health services among children with disabilities in China: An ideological conflict perspective," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:136:y:2022:i:c:s0190740922000780
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2022.106442
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740922000780
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2022.106442?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stephen Kidd, 2017. "Social exclusion and access to social protection schemes," Journal of Development Effectiveness, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(2), pages 212-244, April.
    2. Reshma Parvin Nuri & Setareh Ghahari & Heather Michelle Aldersey & Ahmed Shafiqul Huque, 2020. "Exploring access to government-led support for children with disabilities in Bangladesh," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-18, July.
    3. Yu, Miao & Qi, Cai Yun & To, Siu-ming, 2020. "The evolution and involution of service provision: Interactional understanding of the welfare of urban youth with disabilities in China," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    4. Ann Anagnost, 2008. "From ‘Class’ to ‘Social Strata': grasping the social totality in reform-era China," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(3), pages 497-519.
    5. Ge, Zhong-Ming & Chen, Ren-Xing & Tang, Wei-Zhong & Cong, Yu, 2021. "Why strong employment support for persons with disabilities has not brought about positive outcomes? A qualitative study in mainland China," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Britta Rude, 2022. "Can We Grow with our Children? The Effects of a Comprehensive Early Childhood Development Program," ifo Working Paper Series 372, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    2. Howard White, 2017. "Effective targeting of social programmes: an overview of issues," Journal of Development Effectiveness, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(2), pages 145-161, April.
    3. Xanthe Hunt & Melissa Bradshaw & Steyn Lodewyk Vogel & Alberto Vasquez Encalada & Shanice Eksteen & Marguerite Schneider & Kelly Chunga & Leslie Swartz, 2022. "Community Support for Persons with Disabilities in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-17, July.
    4. Meng, Bingchun & Huang, Yanning, 2017. "Patriarchal capitalism with Chinese characteristics: gendered discourse of ‘Double Eleven’ shopping festival," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 75196, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Niroshan Ramachandran & Zana Vathi, 2023. "Social Connection, (Im)material Gains and Experiences of Inclusion of Asylum Seekers’ and Refugees’ Volunteering in Glasgow," Journal of International Migration and Integration, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 843-863, June.
    6. Lena Morgon Banks & Matthew Walsham & Shailes Neupane & Saurav Neupane & Yogendra Pradhananga & Mahesh Maharjan & Karl Blanchet & Hannah Kuper, 2019. "Access to Social Protection Among People with Disabilities: Mixed Methods Research from Tanahun, Nepal," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 31(4), pages 929-956, September.
    7. Vasja Roblek & Maja Meško & Mirjana Pejić Bach & Oshane Thorpe & Polona Šprajc, 2020. "The Interaction between Internet, Sustainable Development, and Emergence of Society 5.0," Data, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-27, September.
    8. Reshma Parvin Nuri & Setareh Ghahari & Heather Michelle Aldersey & Ahmed Shafiqul Huque, 2020. "Exploring access to government-led support for children with disabilities in Bangladesh," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-18, July.
    9. Seong-A Kim & Heungsoon Kim, 2023. "Path Modeling between Urban Factors and Happiness of People with Disabilities: Using Partial Least Squares Multi-Group Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-18, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:136:y:2022:i:c:s0190740922000780. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.