IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v122y2021ics0190740920323409.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Burden of anaemia among children aged 6–59 months and its associated risk factors in India – Are there gender differences?

Author

Listed:
  • Patel, Kamalesh Kumar
  • Vijay, Jyoti
  • Mangal, Abha
  • Mangal, Daya Krishan
  • Gupta, Shiv Dutt

Abstract

Anaemia, an indicator of poor nutrition and health, is a major public health problem in India. The causes of anaemia are multifactorial, which includes iron deficiency, nutritional deficiencies, chronic infections, inherited blood disorders, obesity and non-communicable diseases. Anaemia has been implicated with growth retardation, impaired motor and cognitive development, and childhood morbidity and mortality. Anaemia among children is a public health problem globally. An estimated 273.2 million children aged 6–59 months suffer from anaemia globally. The aim of the study is to determine the prevalence of anaemia and its determinants among children aged 6–59 months in India. Data has been taken from the latest fourth round of National Family Health survey (2015–16). A total of 2,09,495 children aged 6 to 59 months were included in the study for their analysis. Anaemia was present in 1,20,507 pre-schoolers. Chi-square test and binary logistic regression have been used to determine the association between anaemia and its associated covariates. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Overall, the prevalence of anaemia was found to be 58 percent. Childhood anaemia was significantly associated with the mother’s education, body mass index, place of delivery, maternal anaemia, access to antenatal care, child’s age, birth weight, birth interval, stunting, wasting, underweight and wealth status of the household. In both male and female children, the risk of anaemia was almost similar and significantly higher in undernourished children as compared to their counterparts. Anaemia remains a serious public health concern in most states of India. Gender does not play any role as a risk factor for the great burden of anaemia. Strategies for reducing the severity of anaemia should target women education, birth interval, nutritional status of mother and child, and wealth status of the family.

Suggested Citation

  • Patel, Kamalesh Kumar & Vijay, Jyoti & Mangal, Abha & Mangal, Daya Krishan & Gupta, Shiv Dutt, 2021. "Burden of anaemia among children aged 6–59 months and its associated risk factors in India – Are there gender differences?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:122:y:2021:i:c:s0190740920323409
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105918
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740920323409
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105918?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ghosh, Pritam, 2023. "Determinants and transition of anaemia among under-five children from different social groups in India from 2005–06 to 2015-16," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 320(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:122:y:2021:i:c:s0190740920323409. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.