IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v119y2020ics0190740920307416.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effectiveness of laws and policies governing permissive parenting in pursuit of the reduction of severe child abuse in Germany

Author

Listed:
  • Rönsch, Hendrik

Abstract

Laws and policies governing permissive parenting in Germany including provisional withdrawal of parental custody coupled with children taken preventively into custody (Inobhutnahme) by the German Youth Welfare Offices (Jugendamt) seem to uncover cases of severe child abuse in Germany from the dark into the light field but may not actually have a significant effect on controlling and decreasing such cases. In the year 2000, the German government enforced a series of prohibitive laws in Germany’s civil and social codes to preventively protect children from violence. The costs for processes including continuous monitoring of parental compliance to these laws reached 12.6 billion EUR in the year 2018 with an increase of 146% since 2001. The number of withdrawals of parental custody rose by 65% to approximately 11,000 cases in the same period. The number of children taken preventively into custody due to suspected child maltreatment, abuse or neglect increased by 29% to 40,379 cases in the year 2018. However, the actual number of cases of severe child abuse in Germany did not decline as anticipated, but rose by 39%, close to 3,500 reported cases in the year 2018. The European Parliament issued a resolution highlighting the large number of petitions received regarding the role of the German Youth Welfare Office involved in alleged discrimination. Parents in Germany may be unduly criminalized by preventive intervention in basic parenting rights. From an ethical and legal point of view, the German government may wish to revise the current legislation in the various codes so parents regain freedom to individually chose the most suitable parenting style similar to the Canadian model with proven outcomes regarding maintenance of child wellbeing, prohibition of severe child abuse and effectiveness of reducing family violence.

Suggested Citation

  • Rönsch, Hendrik, 2020. "Effectiveness of laws and policies governing permissive parenting in pursuit of the reduction of severe child abuse in Germany," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:119:y:2020:i:c:s0190740920307416
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105510
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740920307416
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105510?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Patrick Heuveline & Jeffrey M. Timberlake & Frank F. Furstenberg, 2003. "Shifting Childrearing to Single Mothers: Results from 17 Western Countries," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 29(1), pages 47-71, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Teresa Castro Martín, 2010. "Single motherhood and low birthweight in Spain," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 22(27), pages 863-890.
    2. Dorn, David & Autor, David & Hanson, Gordon, 2017. "When Work Disappears: Manufacturing Decline and the Falling Marriage-Market Value of Men," CEPR Discussion Papers 11878, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    3. Harknett, Kristen & Mancini, Patrizia & Knox, Virginia, 2022. "Improvements in father-child interactions: Video observations from the Just Beginning study," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    4. Juho Härkönen & Marika Jalovaara & Eevi Lappalainen & Anneli Miettinen, 2023. "Double Disadvantage in a Nordic Welfare State: A Demographic Analysis of the Single-Parent Employment Gap in Finland, 1987–2018," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 39(1), pages 1-27, December.
    5. Laura Cavalli & Alessandro Bucciol & Paolo Pertile & Veronica Polin & Nicola Sartor & Alessandro Sommacal, 2012. "Modelling life-course decisions for the analysis of interpersonal and intrapersonal redistribution," Working Papers 25/2012, University of Verona, Department of Economics.
    6. Frank F. Furstenberg, 2014. "Fifty Years of Family Change," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 654(1), pages 12-30, July.
    7. Kristin Mammen, 2020. "Children’s Gender and Investments from Nonresident Fathers," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 41(2), pages 332-349, June.
    8. David Autor & David Dorn & Gordon Hanson, 2019. "When Work Disappears: Manufacturing Decline and the Falling Marriage Market Value of Young Men," American Economic Review: Insights, American Economic Association, vol. 1(2), pages 161-178, September.
    9. Christine Schnor, 2014. "The Effect of Union Status at First Childbirth on Union Stability: Evidence from Eastern and Western Germany," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 30(2), pages 129-160, May.
    10. Marika Jalovaara & Gunnar Andersson, 2018. "Disparities in Children’s Family Experiences by Mother’s Socioeconomic Status: The Case of Finland," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 37(5), pages 751-768, October.
    11. Jarl E. Mooyaart & Aart C. Liefbroer, 2016. "The Influence of Parental Education on Timing and Type of Union Formation: Changes Over the Life Course and Over Time in the Netherlands," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 53(4), pages 885-919, August.
    12. Paulina Gałęzewska & Brienna Perelli-Harris & Ann Berrington, 2017. "Cross-national differences in women's repartnering behaviour in Europe: The role of individual demographic characteristics," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 37(8), pages 189-228.
    13. Zsolt Spéder, 2007. "The diversity of Family structure in Europe: A survey on partnership, parenting and childhood across Europe around the millenium," Demográfia, Hungarian Demographic Research Institute, vol. 50(5), pages 105-134.
    14. Tomáš Sobotka & Laurent Toulemon, 2008. "Overview Chapter 4: Changing family and partnership behaviour," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 19(6), pages 85-138.
    15. David Blau & Wilbert Klaauw, 2008. "A demographic analysis of the family structure experiences of children in the United States," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 6(3), pages 193-221, September.
    16. Zachary Winkle, 2018. "Family Trajectories Across Time and Space: Increasing Complexity in Family Life Courses in Europe?," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 55(1), pages 135-164, February.
    17. David Coleman, 2004. "Why we don't have to believe without doubting in the "Second Demographic Transition" - some agnostic comments," Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, Vienna Institute of Demography (VID) of the Austrian Academy of Sciences in Vienna, vol. 2(1), pages 11-24.
    18. Eder, Christoph & Halla, Martin, 2020. "Economic origins of cultural norms: The case of animal husbandry and bastardy," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    19. Lawrence Wu & Kelly Musick, 2008. "Stability of Marital and Cohabiting Unions Following a First Birth," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 27(6), pages 713-727, December.
    20. Brienna Perelli-Harris & Michaela R. Kreyenfeld & Wendy Sigle-Rushton & Renske Keizer & Trude Lappegård & Aiva Jasilioniene & Caroline Berghammer & Paola Di Giulio & Katja Köppen, 2009. "The increase in fertility in cohabitation across Europe: examining the intersection between union status and childbearing," MPIDR Working Papers WP-2009-021, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:119:y:2020:i:c:s0190740920307416. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.