IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v116y2020ics0190740920306277.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Experiences of child welfare workers regarding psychotropic medications: Results from a mixed-method evaluation of a critical medication curriculum

Author

Listed:
  • Hughes, Shannon
  • Cohen, David
  • Lacasse, Jeffrey R.
  • Alessi, Lauren
  • Colonnieves, Karla
  • Rudisill, Sarah

Abstract

This study reports on a mixed-methods evaluation of the impacts of an educational curriculum designed to engage psychosocial professionals in child welfare in critical thinking about psychotropic medication-related issues. Caseworkers in two counties (n = 20) received the curriculum and were compared at baseline and 30-day follow-up to caseworkers (n = 46) in non-intervention counties on general attitudes toward medication. Follow-up focus groups with 13 caseworkers examinined self-reported changes in practice behaviors and the broader contexts shaping medication-related practices for youth in foster care. The CriticalThinkRx curriculum resulted in modest changes in attitudes toward greater perceived harms, with a small-to-medium effect size. Following the curriculum, caseworkers reported asking more questions about medications, increasing their advocacy roles, and adopting a systemic perspective on the use of medications. Across counties, caseworkers described a practice context characterized by a systemic reliance on medications, uncertain roles and lack of education of caseworkers, poor client education about medications, inflexible professional hierarchy, and lack of time or options. Despite nationwide calls for improved psychotropic medication practices in child welfare, myriad professional and systemic barriers exist that perpetuate the primacy of drugs for treating youths’ emotional and behavioral distress.

Suggested Citation

  • Hughes, Shannon & Cohen, David & Lacasse, Jeffrey R. & Alessi, Lauren & Colonnieves, Karla & Rudisill, Sarah, 2020. "Experiences of child welfare workers regarding psychotropic medications: Results from a mixed-method evaluation of a critical medication curriculum," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:116:y:2020:i:c:s0190740920306277
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105193
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740920306277
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105193?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barnett, Erin R. & Butcher, Rebecca L. & Neubacher, Katrin & Jankowski, Mary K. & Daviss, William B. & Carluzzo, Kathleen L. & Ungarelli, Erica G. & Yackley, Cathleen R., 2016. "Psychotropic medications in child welfare: From federal mandate to direct care," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 9-17.
    2. Barnett, Erin R. & Boucher, Elizabeth A. & Neubacher, Katrin & Carpenter-Song, Elizabeth A., 2016. "Decision-making around psychotropic medications for children in foster care: Perspectives from foster parents," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 206-213.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Barnett, Erin R. & Boucher, Elizabeth A. & Neubacher, Katrin & Carpenter-Song, Elizabeth A., 2016. "Decision-making around psychotropic medications for children in foster care: Perspectives from foster parents," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 206-213.
    2. Findley, Erin & Praetorius, Regina T., 2023. "Points of foster parent stress in the system: A qualitative interpretive meta-synthesis," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    3. Bush, Helena & Rapp, John T. & Kierce, Erica, 2021. "Combining stimulants with antipsychotics for foster children and adolescents: Do prescribers adhere to guidelines?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    4. Zhang, Saijun & Smith, Douglas C. & Tabb, Karen M., 2018. "Adolescent depression and the use of services and psychotropic medications in relation to family structure and race/ethnicity," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 636-643.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:116:y:2020:i:c:s0190740920306277. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.