IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v112y2020ics0190740920301584.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Threshold concepts in residential child care: Part 2, relational practice as threshold

Author

Listed:
  • Steckley, Laura

Abstract

Despite growing international consensus around the complex and demanding nature of residential child care for children and young people, consensus is lacking around how to develop a workforce equal to the task. Similarly, there is near unanimity about the essential nature of relationships, particularly the relationship between practitioner and child, for good residential care. At the same time, theorization on how those relationships are enacted and how to support practitioners’ related development of practice is underdeveloped or even absent in some contexts. This second of a two-part paper discusses stage two of a two-stage, transatlantic study aimed at identifying and exploring threshold concepts in residential child care. Threshold concepts are central concepts in a given discipline which are transformative but troublesome for many. They are important to their given discipline because they shape thinking and practice, but they are often difficult to master. In stage one, relational practice was the most prominently discussed potential threshold concept in focus groups comprised of educators and practitioners who had studied, practiced and/or taught in the UK, Canada and/or the US. In stage two, in-depth individual interviews were carried out with practitioners around their threshold experiences of relational practice. Analysis found all five characteristics of threshold concepts reflected in the data, with a particular emphasis on the troublesome nature of relationship boundaries. A further theme around the relational nature of teaching and learning relational practice was identified, raising important parallels between the relational experiences practitioners have as part of their training, and their relational practice in the field. Implications are discussed, including the misfit between the demarcation of professional boundaries as applied by cognate fields and the actual requirements of ameliorative relationships in residential child care.

Suggested Citation

  • Steckley, Laura, 2020. "Threshold concepts in residential child care: Part 2, relational practice as threshold," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:112:y:2020:i:c:s0190740920301584
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.104825
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740920301584
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.104825?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bellefeuille, Gerard & Ricks, Frances, 2010. "Relational inquiry: A child and youth care approach to research," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(10), pages 1235-1241, October.
    2. Ewa Łodygowska & Magdalena Chęć & Agnieszka Samochowiec, 2017. "Academic motivation in children with dyslexia," The Journal of Educational Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 110(5), pages 575-580, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Izzo, Charles V. & Smith, Elliott G. & Sellers, Deborah E. & Holden, Martha J. & Nunno, Michael A., 2022. "Promoting a relational approach to residential child care through an organizational program model: Impacts of CARE implementation on staff outcomes," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xu, Yanfeng & Bright, Charlotte Lyn, 2018. "Children's mental health and its predictors in kinship and non-kinship foster care: A systematic review," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 243-262.
    2. Gerard Bellefeuille & Kerry Heaney Dalton & Stephen Neuman & Asma Ammouneh & Cassie Anthony & Maya Bautista & Gabrielle Benzon & Jack Deol & Lori Smith & Kelly-Ann Reid & Sarah Thang, 2017. "Traversing the Threshold in Child and Youth Care Education: A Qualitative Inquiry into the Meaning-Making Experience of Student Participants in an International Study Tour," Research Journal of Education, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 3(2), pages 12-22, 02-2017.
    3. Longhofer, Jeffrey & Floersch, Jerry & Okpych, Nate, 2011. "Foster youth and psychotropic treatment: Where next?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 395-404, February.
    4. Gliske, Kate & Ballard, Jaime & Buchanan, Gretchen & Borden, Lynne & Perkins, Daniel Francis, 2021. "The components of quality in youth programs and association with positive youth outcomes: A person-centered approach," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    5. Ballard, Jaime & Borden, Lynne & Perkins, Daniel Francis, 2021. "Program quality components related to youth civic engagement," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:112:y:2020:i:c:s0190740920301584. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.