IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v67y2013icp236-247.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Introduction to face recognition and evaluation of algorithm performance

Author

Listed:
  • Givens, G.H.
  • Beveridge, J.R.
  • Phillips, P.J.
  • Draper, B.
  • Lui, Y.M.
  • Bolme, D.

Abstract

The field of biometric face recognition blends methods from computer science, engineering and statistics, however statistical reasoning has been applied predominantly in the design of recognition algorithms. A new opportunity for the application of statistical methods is driven by growing interest in biometric performance evaluation. Methods for performance evaluation seek to identify, compare and interpret how characteristics of subjects, the environment and images are associated with the performance of recognition algorithms. Some central topics in face recognition are reviewed for background and several examples of recognition algorithms are given. One approach to the evaluation problem is then illustrated with a generalized linear mixed model analysis of the Good, Bad, and Ugly Face Challenge, a pre-eminent face recognition dataset used to test state-of-the-art still-image face recognition algorithms. Findings include that (i) between-subject variation is the dominant source of verification heterogeneity when algorithm performance is good, and (ii) many covariate effects on verification performance are ‘universal’ across easy, medium and hard verification tasks. Although the design and evaluation of face recognition algorithms draw upon some familiar statistical ideas in multivariate statistics, dimension reduction, classification, clustering, binary response data, generalized linear models and random effects, the field also presents some unique features and challenges. Opportunities abound for innovative statistical work in this new field.

Suggested Citation

  • Givens, G.H. & Beveridge, J.R. & Phillips, P.J. & Draper, B. & Lui, Y.M. & Bolme, D., 2013. "Introduction to face recognition and evaluation of algorithm performance," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 236-247.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:67:y:2013:i:c:p:236-247
    DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2013.05.025
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167947313002120
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.csda.2013.05.025?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Eugster, Manuel J.A. & Leisch, Friedrich & Strobl, Carolin, 2014. "(Psycho-)analysis of benchmark experiments: A formal framework for investigating the relationship between data sets and learning algorithms," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 986-1000.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:67:y:2013:i:c:p:236-247. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.