IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v53y2009i4p1483-1494.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving malware detection by applying multi-inducer ensemble

Author

Listed:
  • Menahem, Eitan
  • Shabtai, Asaf
  • Rokach, Lior
  • Elovici, Yuval

Abstract

Detection of malicious software (malware) using machine learning methods has been explored extensively to enable fast detection of new released malware. The performance of these classifiers depends on the induction algorithms being used. In order to benefit from multiple different classifiers, and exploit their strengths we suggest using an ensemble method that will combine the results of the individual classifiers into one final result to achieve overall higher detection accuracy. In this paper we evaluate several combining methods using five different base inducers (C4.5 Decision Tree, Naïve Bayes, KNN, VFI and OneR) on five malware datasets. The main goal is to find the best combining method for the task of detecting malicious files in terms of accuracy, AUC and Execution time.

Suggested Citation

  • Menahem, Eitan & Shabtai, Asaf & Rokach, Lior & Elovici, Yuval, 2009. "Improving malware detection by applying multi-inducer ensemble," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(4), pages 1483-1494, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:53:y:2009:i:4:p:1483-1494
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-9473(08)00476-3
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cai, D. Michael & Gokhale, Maya & Theiler, James, 2007. "Comparison of feature selection and classification algorithms in identifying malicious executables," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(6), pages 3156-3172, March.
    2. Moskovitch, Robert & Elovici, Yuval & Rokach, Lior, 2008. "Detection of unknown computer worms based on behavioral classification of the host," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(9), pages 4544-4566, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rokach, Lior, 2009. "Collective-agreement-based pruning of ensembles," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(4), pages 1015-1026, February.
    2. Rokach, Lior, 2009. "Taxonomy for characterizing ensemble methods in classification tasks: A review and annotated bibliography," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(12), pages 4046-4072, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. D. Thorleuchter & D. Van Den Poel, 2012. "Improved Multilevel Security with Latent Semantic Indexing," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 12/811, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    2. Rokach, Lior, 2009. "Taxonomy for characterizing ensemble methods in classification tasks: A review and annotated bibliography," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(12), pages 4046-4072, October.
    3. Rokach, Lior, 2009. "Collective-agreement-based pruning of ensembles," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(4), pages 1015-1026, February.
    4. Moskovitch, Robert & Elovici, Yuval & Rokach, Lior, 2008. "Detection of unknown computer worms based on behavioral classification of the host," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(9), pages 4544-4566, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:53:y:2009:i:4:p:1483-1494. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.