IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v53y2009i3p820-833.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inferences and power analysis concerning two negative binomial distributions with an application to MRI lesion counts data

Author

Listed:
  • Aban, Inmaculada B.
  • Cutter, Gary R.
  • Mavinga, Nsoki

Abstract

In comparing the mean count of two independent samples, some practitioners would use the t-test or the Wilcoxon rank sum test while others may use methods based on a Poisson model. It is not uncommon to encounter count data that exhibit overdispersion where the Poisson model is no longer appropriate. This paper deals with methods for overdispersed data using the negative binomial distribution resulting from a Poisson-Gamma mixture. We investigate the small sample properties of the likelihood-based tests and compare their performances to those of the t-test and of the Wilcoxon test. We also illustrate how these procedures may be used to compute power and sample sizes to design studies with response variables that are overdispersed count data. Although methods are based on inferences about two independent samples, sample size calculations may also be applied to problems comparing more than two independent samples. It will be shown that there is gain in efficiency when using the likelihood-based methods compared to the t-test and the Wilcoxon test. In studies where each observation is very costly, the ability to derive smaller sample size estimates with the appropriate tests is not only statistically, but also financially, appealing.

Suggested Citation

  • Aban, Inmaculada B. & Cutter, Gary R. & Mavinga, Nsoki, 2009. "Inferences and power analysis concerning two negative binomial distributions with an application to MRI lesion counts data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 820-833, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:53:y:2009:i:3:p:820-833
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-9473(08)00371-X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rosa Esteve & Alicia Eva López-Martínez & Gema Teresa Ruíz-Párraga & Elena Rocío Serrano-Ibáñez & Carmen Ramírez-Maestre, 2020. "Pain Acceptance and Pain-Related Disability Predict Healthcare Utilization and Medication Intake in Patients with Non-Specific Chronic Spinal Pain," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-12, July.
    2. Jones, Mark & Dobson, Annette & Onslow, Mark & Carey, Brenda, 2009. "Negative binomial mixed models for analysis of stuttering rates," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(12), pages 4590-4600, October.
    3. Simon Arsène & Claire Couty & Igor Faddeenkov & Natacha Go & Solène Granjeon-Noriot & Daniel Šmít & Riad Kahoul & Ben Illigens & Jean-Pierre Boissel & Aude Chevalier & Lorenz Lehr & Christian Pasquali, 2022. "Modeling the disruption of respiratory disease clinical trials by non-pharmaceutical COVID-19 interventions," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.
    4. Baíllo, A. & Berrendero, J.R. & Cárcamo, J., 2009. "Tests for zero-inflation and overdispersion: A new approach based on the stochastic convex order," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(7), pages 2628-2639, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:53:y:2009:i:3:p:820-833. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.