IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v50y2006i5p1272-1286.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hierarchical models for repeated binary data using the IBF sampler

Author

Listed:
  • Tan, Ming
  • Tian, Guo-Liang
  • Wang Ng, Kai

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Tan, Ming & Tian, Guo-Liang & Wang Ng, Kai, 2006. "Hierarchical models for repeated binary data using the IBF sampler," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 50(5), pages 1272-1286, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:50:y:2006:i:5:p:1272-1286
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-9473(04)00398-6
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. A. Mira & J. Møller & G. O. Roberts, 2001. "Perfect slice samplers," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 63(3), pages 593-606.
    2. Øivind Skare & Erik Bølviken & Lars Holden, 2003. "Improved Sampling‐Importance Resampling and Reduced Bias Importance Sampling," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 30(4), pages 719-737, December.
    3. repec:dau:papers:123456789/6189 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. D. Oakes, 1999. "Direct calculation of the information matrix via the EM," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 61(2), pages 479-482, April.
    5. J. G. Booth & J. P. Hobert, 1999. "Maximizing generalized linear mixed model likelihoods with an automated Monte Carlo EM algorithm," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 61(1), pages 265-285.
    6. Casella G. & Lavine M. & Robert C. P., 2001. "Explaining the Perfect Sampler," The American Statistician, American Statistical Association, vol. 55, pages 299-305, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Solaiman Afroughi & Soghrat Faghihzadeh & Majid Jafari Khaledi & Mehdi Ghandehari Motlagh & Ebrahim Hajizadeh, 2011. "Analysis of clustered spatially correlated binary data using autologistic model and Bayesian method with an application to dental caries of 3--5-year-old children," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(12), pages 2763-2774, February.
    2. Eleftheraki, Anastasia G. & Kateri, Maria & Ntzoufras, Ioannis, 2009. "Bayesian analysis of two dependent 22 contingency tables," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(7), pages 2724-2732, May.
    3. Wang, Wan-Lun & Fan, Tsai-Hung, 2012. "Bayesian analysis of multivariate t linear mixed models using a combination of IBF and Gibbs samplers," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 105(1), pages 300-310.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shu Yang & Jae Kwang Kim, 2016. "Likelihood-based Inference with Missing Data Under Missing-at-Random," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 43(2), pages 436-454, June.
    2. Scott Monroe, 2019. "Estimation of Expected Fisher Information for IRT Models," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 44(4), pages 431-447, August.
    3. Hemant Kulkarni & Jayabrata Biswas & Kiranmoy Das, 2019. "A joint quantile regression model for multiple longitudinal outcomes," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 103(4), pages 453-473, December.
    4. Tatiyana V. Apanasovich & David Ruppert & Joanne R. Lupton & Natasa Popovic & Nancy D. Turner & Robert S. Chapkin & Raymond J. Carroll, 2008. "Aberrant Crypt Foci and Semiparametric Modeling of Correlated Binary Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 64(2), pages 490-500, June.
    5. Matteo Barigozzi & Matteo Luciani, 2019. "Quasi Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inference of Large Approximate Dynamic Factor Models via the EM algorithm," Papers 1910.03821, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2024.
    6. Ricardo Smith Ramírez, 2007. "FIML estimation of treatment effect models with endogenous selection and multiple censored responses via a Monte Carlo EM Algorithm," Working Papers DTE 403, CIDE, División de Economía.
    7. Brent A. Coull & Alan Agresti, 2000. "Random Effects Modeling of Multiple Binomial Responses Using the Multivariate Binomial Logit-Normal Distribution," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 56(1), pages 73-80, March.
    8. Gael M. Martin & David T. Frazier & Christian P. Robert, 2020. "Computing Bayes: Bayesian Computation from 1763 to the 21st Century," Monash Econometrics and Business Statistics Working Papers 14/20, Monash University, Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics.
    9. J. E. Mills & C. A. Field & D. J. Dupuis, 2002. "Marginally Specified Generalized Linear Mixed Models: A Robust Approach," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 58(4), pages 727-734, December.
    10. Marcin Kacperczyk & Paul Damien & Stephen G. Walker, 2013. "A new class of Bayesian semi-parametric models with applications to option pricing," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(6), pages 967-980, May.
    11. Bounnite Mohamed Yasser & Nasroallah Abdelaziz, 2015. "Widening and clustering techniques allowing the use of monotone CFTP algorithm," Monte Carlo Methods and Applications, De Gruyter, vol. 21(4), pages 301-312, December.
    12. Zhou, Lin & Tang, Yayong, 2021. "Linearly preconditioned nonlinear conjugate gradient acceleration of the PX-EM algorithm," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    13. Björn Andersson & Tao Xin, 2021. "Estimation of Latent Regression Item Response Theory Models Using a Second-Order Laplace Approximation," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 46(2), pages 244-265, April.
    14. Jan Pablo Burgard & Patricia Dörr & Ralf Münnich, 2020. "Monte-Carlo Simulation Studies in Survey Statistics – An Appraisal," Research Papers in Economics 2020-04, University of Trier, Department of Economics.
    15. Runhuan Feng & Peng Li, 2021. "Sample Recycling Method -- A New Approach to Efficient Nested Monte Carlo Simulations," Papers 2106.06028, arXiv.org.
    16. Giorgio Eduardo Montanari & Marco Doretti & Maria Francesca Marino, 2022. "Model-based two-way clustering of second-level units in ordinal multilevel latent Markov models," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 16(2), pages 457-485, June.
    17. Kauermann, Goran & Xu, Ronghui & Vaida, Florin, 2008. "Stacked Laplace-EM algorithm for duration models with time-varying and random effects," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(5), pages 2514-2528, January.
    18. Steffen Nestler & Sarah Humberg, 2022. "A Lasso and a Regression Tree Mixed-Effect Model with Random Effects for the Level, the Residual Variance, and the Autocorrelation," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 87(2), pages 506-532, June.
    19. Bacci, Silvia & Bartolucci, Francesco & Pieroni, Luca, 2012. "A causal analysis of mother’s education on birth inequalities," MPRA Paper 38754, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Poncela, Pilar & Ruiz, Esther & Miranda, Karen, 2021. "Factor extraction using Kalman filter and smoothing: This is not just another survey," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 1399-1425.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:50:y:2006:i:5:p:1272-1286. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.