IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v32y2000i3-4p411-442.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multilevel homogeneity analysis with differential weighting

Author

Listed:
  • Michailidis, George
  • de Leeuw, Jan

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Michailidis, George & de Leeuw, Jan, 2000. "Multilevel homogeneity analysis with differential weighting," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 32(3-4), pages 411-442, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:32:y:2000:i:3-4:p:411-442
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-9473(99)00086-9
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J. Carroll & Jih-Jie Chang, 1970. "Analysis of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via an n-way generalization of “Eckart-Young” decomposition," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 35(3), pages 283-319, September.
    2. I.W. Molenaar, 1988. "Formal statistics and informal data analysis, or why laziness should be discouraged," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 42(2), pages 83-90, June.
    3. Michel Tenenhaus & Forrest Young, 1985. "An analysis and synthesis of multiple correspondence analysis, optimal scaling, dual scaling, homogeneity analysis and other methods for quantifying categorical multivariate data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 50(1), pages 91-119, March.
    4. J. de Leeuw, 1988. "Models and techniques," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 42(2), pages 91-98, June.
    5. André Carlier & Pieter Kroonenberg, 1996. "Decompositions and biplots in three-way correspondence analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 61(2), pages 355-373, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Paola Costantini & Marielle Linting & Giovanni C. Porzio, 2010. "Mining performance data through nonlinear PCA with optimal scaling," Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(1), pages 85-101, January.
    2. Jia Huang & Hu-Chen Liu & Chun-Yan Duan & Ming-Shun Song, 2022. "An improved reliability model for FMEA using probabilistic linguistic term sets and TODIM method," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 312(1), pages 235-258, May.
    3. George Michailidis & Jan Leeuw, 2001. "Data Visualization through Graph Drawing," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 435-450, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mariela González-Narváez & María José Fernández-Gómez & Susana Mendes & José-Luis Molina & Omar Ruiz-Barzola & Purificación Galindo-Villardón, 2021. "Study of Temporal Variations in Species–Environment Association through an Innovative Multivariate Method: MixSTATICO," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-25, May.
    2. Vartan Choulakian, 1988. "Exploratory analysis of contingency tables by loglinear formulation and generalizations of correspondence analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 53(2), pages 235-250, June.
    3. Jan Leeuw, 1988. "Multivariate analysis with linearizable regressions," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 53(4), pages 437-454, December.
    4. repec:jss:jstsof:34:i10 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Henk Kiers, 1991. "Simple structure in component analysis techniques for mixtures of qualitative and quantitative variables," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 56(2), pages 197-212, June.
    6. Vivien, Myrtille & Sabatier, Robert, 2004. "A generalization of STATIS-ACT strategy: DO-ACT for two multiblocks tables," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 155-171, May.
    7. S. Hess & E. Suárez & J. Camacho & G. Ramírez & B. Hernández, 2001. "Reliability of Coordinates Obtained by MINISSA Concerning the Order of Presented Stimuli," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 117-128, May.
    8. Rosaria Lombardo & Yoshio Takane & Eric J. Beh, 2020. "Familywise decompositions of Pearson’s chi-square statistic in the analysis of contingency tables," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 14(3), pages 629-649, September.
    9. Wedel, M. & Bijmolt, T.H.A., 1998. "Mixed Tree and Spatial Representation of Dissimilarity Judgments," Discussion Paper 1998-109, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    10. Henk Kiers, 1991. "Hierarchical relations among three-way methods," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 56(3), pages 449-470, September.
    11. Willem Kloot & Pieter Kroonenberg, 1985. "External analysis with three-mode principal component models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 50(4), pages 479-494, December.
    12. Pietro Amenta & Antonio Lucadamo & Antonello D’Ambra, 2021. "Restricted Common Component and Specific Weight Analysis: A Constrained Explorative Approach for the Customer Satisfaction Evaluation," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 156(2), pages 409-427, August.
    13. Elizabeth Hellier & Kirsteen Aldrich & Daniel B. Wright & Denny Daunt & Judy Edworthy, 2007. "A Multi Dimensional Analysis of Warning Signal Words," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(3), pages 323-338, April.
    14. Stegeman, Alwin & Ten Berge, Jos M.F., 2006. "Kruskal's condition for uniqueness in Candecomp/Parafac when ranks and k-ranks coincide," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 50(1), pages 210-220, January.
    15. Elisa Frutos-Bernal & Ángel Martín del Rey & Irene Mariñas-Collado & María Teresa Santos-Martín, 2022. "An Analysis of Travel Patterns in Barcelona Metro Using Tucker3 Decomposition," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, March.
    16. Jad Beyhum & Eric Gautier, 2020. "Factor and factor loading augmented estimators for panel regression," Working Papers hal-02957008, HAL.
    17. Viet-Thi Tran & Mariam Mama Djima & Eugene Messou & Jocelyne Moisan & Jean-Pierre Grégoire & Didier K Ekouevi, 2018. "Avoidable workload of care for patients living with HIV infection in Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire: A cross-sectional study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-15, August.
    18. Douglas Clarkson & Richard Gonzalez, 2001. "Random effects diagonal metric multidimensional scaling models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 66(1), pages 25-43, March.
    19. Rolf Langeheine, 1982. "Statistical evaluation of measures of fit in the Lingoes-Borg procrustean individual differences scaling," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 47(4), pages 427-442, December.
    20. Gardner, Sugnet & Gower, John C. & le Roux, N.J., 2006. "A synthesis of canonical variate analysis, generalised canonical correlation and Procrustes analysis," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 50(1), pages 107-134, January.
    21. Phipps Arabie & J. Carroll, 1980. "Mapclus: A mathematical programming approach to fitting the adclus model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 45(2), pages 211-235, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:32:y:2000:i:3-4:p:411-442. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.