IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v24y1997i1p47-61.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An evaluation of simple methods for the estimation of a common odds ratio in clusters with variable size

Author

Listed:
  • Ahn, Chul

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahn, Chul, 1997. "An evaluation of simple methods for the estimation of a common odds ratio in clusters with variable size," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 24(1), pages 47-61, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:24:y:1997:i:1:p:47-61
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-9473(96)00054-0
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. K. Y. Fung & D. Krewski & J. N. K. Rao & A. J. Scott, 1994. "Tests for Trend in Developmental Toxicity Experiments with Correlated Binary Data," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(4), pages 639-648, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sanchez-Meca, Julio & Marin-Martinez, Fulgencio, 2000. "Testing the significance of a common risk difference in meta-analysis," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 299-313, May.
    2. Ahn, Chul & Hu, Fan & Skinner, Celette Sugg, 2009. "Effect of imbalance and intracluster correlation coefficient in cluster randomized trials with binary outcomes," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 596-602, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. John F. Fox & Karen A. Hogan & Allen Davis, 2017. "Dose‐Response Modeling with Summary Data from Developmental Toxicity Studies," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(5), pages 905-917, May.
    2. D. Krewski & Y. Zhu, 1995. "A Simple Data Transformation for Estimating Benchmark Doses in Developmental Toxicity Experiments," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(1), pages 29-39, February.
    3. Karen Y. Fung & Leonora Marro & Daniel Krewski, 1998. "A Comparison of Methods for Estimating the Benchmark Dose Based on Overdispersed Data from Developmental Toxicity Studies," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(3), pages 329-342, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:24:y:1997:i:1:p:47-61. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.