IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v199y2024ics0167947324000999.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimizing designs in clinical trials with an application in treatment of Epidermolysis bullosa simplex, a rare genetic skin disease

Author

Listed:
  • Nyberg, Joakim
  • Hooker, Andrew C.
  • Zimmermann, Georg
  • Verbeeck, Johan
  • Geroldinger, Martin
  • Thiel, Konstantin Emil
  • Molenberghs, Geert
  • Laimer, Martin
  • Wally, Verena

Abstract

Epidermolysis bullosa simplex (EBS) skin disease is a rare disease, which renders the use of optimal design techniques especially important to maximize the potential information in a future study, that is, to make efficient use of the limited number of available subjects and observations. A generalized linear mixed effects model (GLMM), built on an EBS trial was used to optimize the design. The model assumed a full treatment effect in the follow-up period. In addition to this model, two models with either no assumed treatment effect or a linearly declining treatment effect in the follow-up were assumed. The information gain and loss when changing the number of EBS blisters counts, altering the duration of the treatment as well as changing the study period was assessed. In addition, optimization of the EBS blister assessment times was performed. The optimization was utilizing the derived Fisher information matrix for the GLMM with EBS blister counts and the information gain and loss was quantified by D-optimal efficiency. The optimization results indicated that using optimal assessment times increases the information of about 110-120%, varying slightly between the assumed treatment models. In addition, the result showed that the assessment times were also sensitive to be moved ± one week, but assessment times within ± two days were not decreasing the information as long as three assessments (out of four assessments in the trial period) were within the treatment period and not in the follow-up period. Increasing the number of assessments to six or five per trial period increased the information to 130% and 115%, respectively, while decreasing the number of assessments to two or three, decreased the information to 50% and 80%, respectively. Increasing the length of the trial period had a minor impact on the information, while increasing the treatment period by two and four weeks had a larger impact, 120% and 130%, respectively. To conclude, general applications of optimal design methodology, derivation of the Fisher information matrix for GLMM with count data and examples on how optimal design could be used when designing trials for treatment of the EBS disease is presented. The methodology is also of interest for study designs where maximizing the information is essential. Therefore, a general applied research guidance for using optimal design is also provided.

Suggested Citation

  • Nyberg, Joakim & Hooker, Andrew C. & Zimmermann, Georg & Verbeeck, Johan & Geroldinger, Martin & Thiel, Konstantin Emil & Molenberghs, Geert & Laimer, Martin & Wally, Verena, 2024. "Optimizing designs in clinical trials with an application in treatment of Epidermolysis bullosa simplex, a rare genetic skin disease," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:199:y:2024:i:c:s0167947324000999
    DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2024.108015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167947324000999
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.csda.2024.108015?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:199:y:2024:i:c:s0167947324000999. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.