IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v176y2022ics0167947322001384.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Iterative importance sampling with Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling in robust Bayesian analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Raices Cruz, Ivette
  • Lindström, Johan
  • Troffaes, Matthias C.M.
  • Sahlin, Ullrika

Abstract

Bayesian inference under a set of priors, called robust Bayesian analysis, allows for estimation of parameters within a model and quantification of epistemic uncertainty in quantities of interest by bounded (or imprecise) probability. Iterative importance sampling can be used to estimate bounds on the quantity of interest by optimizing over the set of priors. A method for iterative importance sampling when the robust Bayesian inference relies on Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling is proposed. To accommodate the MCMC sampling in iterative importance sampling, a new expression for the effective sample size of the importance sampling is derived, which accounts for the correlation in the MCMC samples. To illustrate the proposed method for robust Bayesian analysis, iterative importance sampling with MCMC sampling is applied to estimate the lower bound of the overall effect in a previously published meta-analysis with a random effects model. The performance of the method compared to a grid search method and under different degrees of prior-data conflict is also explored.

Suggested Citation

  • Raices Cruz, Ivette & Lindström, Johan & Troffaes, Matthias C.M. & Sahlin, Ullrika, 2022. "Iterative importance sampling with Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling in robust Bayesian analysis," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:176:y:2022:i:c:s0167947322001384
    DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2022.107558
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167947322001384
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.csda.2022.107558?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liesenfeld, Roman & Richard, Jean-François, 2008. "Improving MCMC, using efficient importance sampling," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(2), pages 272-288, December.
    2. Bhattacharya, Sourabh, 2008. "Consistent estimation of the accuracy of importance sampling using regenerative simulation," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 78(15), pages 2522-2527, October.
    3. John Paul Gosling, 2018. "SHELF: The Sheffield Elicitation Framework," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Luis C. Dias & Alec Morton & John Quigley (ed.), Elicitation, chapter 0, pages 61-93, Springer.
    4. Nash, John C. & Varadhan, Ravi, 2011. "Unifying Optimization Algorithms to Aid Software System Users: optimx for R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 43(i09).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Radi Romansky, 2022. "Stochastic Approach to Investigate Protected Access to Information Resources in Combined E-Learning Environment," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(16), pages 1-12, August.
    2. Andral, Charly & Douc, Randal & Marival, Hugo & Robert, Christian P., 2024. "The importance Markov chain," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bauwens, L. & Galli, F., 2009. "Efficient importance sampling for ML estimation of SCD models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(6), pages 1974-1992, April.
    2. Claire Copeland & Britta Turner & Gareth Powells & Kevin Wilson, 2022. "In Search of Complementarity: Insights from an Exercise in Quantifying Qualitative Energy Futures," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-21, July.
    3. Zong, Weiyan & Zhang, Junyi & Yang, Xiaoguang, 2023. "Building a life-course intertemporal discrete choice model to analyze migration biographies," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 47(C).
    4. Bivand, Roger & Piras, Gianfranco, 2015. "Comparing Implementations of Estimation Methods for Spatial Econometrics," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 63(i18).
    5. repec:rri:wpaper:201301 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Sameh Abdulah & Yuxiao Li & Jian Cao & Hatem Ltaief & David E. Keyes & Marc G. Genton & Ying Sun, 2023. "Large‐scale environmental data science with ExaGeoStatR," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(1), February.
    7. Stavrakoudis, Athanassios & Panagiotou, Dimitrios, 2016. "Price dependence and asymmetric responses between coffee varieties," Agricultural Economics Review, Greek Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 17(2), June.
    8. Ghysels, Eric & Kvedaras, Virmantas & Zemlys, Vaidotas, 2016. "Mixed Frequency Data Sampling Regression Models: The R Package midasr," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 72(i04).
    9. Faustino Prieto & José María Sarabia & Enrique Calderín-Ojeda, 2021. "The nonlinear distribution of employment across municipalities," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 16(2), pages 287-307, April.
    10. Nima Khalighinejad & Neil Garrett & Luke Priestley & Patricia Lockwood & Matthew F. S. Rushworth, 2021. "A habenula-insular circuit encodes the willingness to act," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
    11. Christopher J. Cadham & Marie Knoll & Luz María Sánchez-Romero & K. Michael Cummings & Clifford E. Douglas & Alex Liber & David Mendez & Rafael Meza & Ritesh Mistry & Aylin Sertkaya & Nargiz Travis , 2022. "The Use of Expert Elicitation among Computational Modeling Studies in Health Research: A Systematic Review," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 42(5), pages 684-703, July.
    12. Pastorello, S. & Rossi, E., 2010. "Efficient importance sampling maximum likelihood estimation of stochastic differential equations," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(11), pages 2753-2762, November.
    13. Jeroen P. Jansen & Thomas A. Trikalinos & Kathryn A. Phillips, 2022. "Assessments of the Value of New Interventions Should Include Health Equity Impact," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 40(5), pages 489-495, May.
    14. Anna Gloria Billé & Marco Rogna, 2022. "The effect of weather conditions on fertilizer applications: A spatial dynamic panel data analysis," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 185(1), pages 3-36, January.
    15. Braun, Michael, 2014. "trustOptim: An R Package for Trust Region Optimization with Sparse Hessians," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 60(i04).
    16. Noe Wiener, 2018. "Measuring Labor Market Segmentation from Incomplete Data," UMASS Amherst Economics Working Papers 2018-01, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Department of Economics.
    17. Song, Jingyu & Delgado, Michael & Preckel, Paul, 2017. "Aggregated Fractional Regression Estimation: Some Monte Carlo Evidence," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 258209, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    18. Naylor, J.C. & Tremayne, A.R. & Marriott, J.M., 2010. "Exploratory data analysis and model criticism with posterior plots," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(11), pages 2707-2720, November.
    19. Danila Azzolina & Paola Berchialla & Silvia Bressan & Liviana Da Dalt & Dario Gregori & Ileana Baldi, 2022. "A Bayesian Sample Size Estimation Procedure Based on a B-Splines Semiparametric Elicitation Method," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-15, October.
    20. Panagiotou Dimitrios & Stavrakoudis Athanassios, 2016. "Price Dependence between Different Beef Cuts and Quality Grades: A Copula Approach at the Retail Level for the U.S. Beef Industry," Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, De Gruyter, vol. 14(1), pages 121-131, May.
    21. Stavrakoudis, Athanassios & Panagiotou, Dimitrios, 2016. "Price dependence between coffee qualities: a copula model to evaluate asymmetric responses," MPRA Paper 75994, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:176:y:2022:i:c:s0167947322001384. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.