IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v155y2021ics0167947320302048.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Parallel cross-validation: A scalable fitting method for Gaussian process models

Author

Listed:
  • Gerber, Florian
  • Nychka, Douglas W.

Abstract

Gaussian process (GP) models are widely used to analyze spatially referenced data and to predict values at locations without observations. They are based on a statistical framework, which enables uncertainty quantification of the model structure and predictions. Both the evaluation of the likelihood and the prediction involve solving linear systems. Hence, the computational costs are large and limit the amount of data that can be handled. While there are many approximation strategies that lower the computational cost of GP models, they often provide sub-optimal support for the parallel computing capabilities of (high-performance) computing environments. To bridge this gap a parallelizable parameter estimation and prediction method is presented. The key idea is to divide the spatial domain into overlapping subsets and to use cross-validation (CV) to estimate the covariance parameters in parallel. Although simulations show that CV is less effective for parameter estimation than the maximum likelihood method, it is amenable to parallel computing and enables the handling of large datasets. Exploiting the screen effect for spatial prediction helps to arrive at a spatial analysis that is close to a global computation despite performing parallel computations on local regions. Simulation studies assess the accuracy of the parameter estimates and predictions. The implementation shows good weak and strong parallel scaling properties. For illustration, an exponential covariance model is fitted to a scientifically relevant canopy height dataset with 5 million observations. Using 512 processor cores in parallel brings the evaluation time of one covariance parameter configuration to 1.5 minutes.

Suggested Citation

  • Gerber, Florian & Nychka, Douglas W., 2021. "Parallel cross-validation: A scalable fitting method for Gaussian process models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:155:y:2021:i:c:s0167947320302048
    DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2020.107113
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167947320302048
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.csda.2020.107113?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bachoc, François, 2013. "Cross Validation and Maximum Likelihood estimations of hyper-parameters of Gaussian processes with model misspecification," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 55-69.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Szarek, Dawid & Maraj-Zygmąt, Katarzyna & Sikora, Grzegorz & Krapf, Diego & Wyłomańska, Agnieszka, 2022. "Statistical test for anomalous diffusion based on empirical anomaly measure for Gaussian processes," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Acharki, Naoufal & Bertoncello, Antoine & Garnier, Josselin, 2023. "Robust prediction interval estimation for Gaussian processes by cross-validation method," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    2. Marrel, Amandine & Iooss, Bertrand, 2024. "Probabilistic surrogate modeling by Gaussian process: A new estimation algorithm for more robust prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    3. Binois, M. & Ginsbourger, D. & Roustant, O., 2015. "Quantifying uncertainty on Pareto fronts with Gaussian process conditional simulations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 243(2), pages 386-394.
    4. Bachoc, François & Lagnoux, Agnès & Nguyen, Thi Mong Ngoc, 2017. "Cross-validation estimation of covariance parameters under fixed-domain asymptotics," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 42-67.
    5. Kleijnen, Jack P.C. & Mehdad, E., 2013. "Conditional simulation for efficient global optimization," Other publications TiSEM 52e4860d-9887-4a63-b19a-7, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    6. Bachoc, François, 2014. "Asymptotic analysis of the role of spatial sampling for covariance parameter estimation of Gaussian processes," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 1-35.
    7. Aikaterini P. Kyprioti & Alexandros A. Taflanidis & Norberto C. Nadal-Caraballo & Madison O. Campbell, 2021. "Incorporation of sea level rise in storm surge surrogate modeling," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 105(1), pages 531-563, January.
    8. Jize Zhang & Alexandros A. Taflanidis & Norberto C. Nadal-Caraballo & Jeffrey A. Melby & Fatimata Diop, 2018. "Advances in surrogate modeling for storm surge prediction: storm selection and addressing characteristics related to climate change," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 94(3), pages 1225-1253, December.
    9. Betancourt, José & Bachoc, François & Klein, Thierry & Idier, Déborah & Pedreros, Rodrigo & Rohmer, Jérémy, 2020. "Gaussian process metamodeling of functional-input code for coastal flood hazard assessment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    10. Lee, Dongjin & Kramer, Boris, 2023. "Multifidelity conditional value-at-risk estimation by dimensionally decomposed generalized polynomial chaos-Kriging," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    11. François Bachoc & Emile Contal & Hassan Maatouk & Didier Rullière, 2017. "Gaussian processes for computer experiments," Post-Print hal-01665936, HAL.
    12. Cousin, Areski & Maatouk, Hassan & Rullière, Didier, 2016. "Kriging of financial term-structures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 255(2), pages 631-648.
    13. Auffray, Yves & Barbillon, Pierre & Marin, Jean-Michel, 2014. "Bounding rare event probabilities in computer experiments," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 153-166.
    14. Marrel, Amandine & Iooss, Bertrand, 2024. "Probabilistic surrogate modeling by Gaussian process: A review on recent insights in estimation and validation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    15. Bachoc, François & Bevilacqua, Moreno & Velandia, Daira, 2019. "Composite likelihood estimation for a Gaussian process under fixed domain asymptotics," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    16. Cousin, Areski & Maatouk, Hassan & Rullière, Didier, 2016. "Kriging of financial term-structures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 255(2), pages 631-648.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:155:y:2021:i:c:s0167947320302048. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.