IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v139y2019icp64-74.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling using a reservoir method

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Zhonglei

Abstract

Markov chain Monte Carlo methods are widely used to draw a sample from a target distribution which is hard to characterize analytically, and reservoir sampling is developed to obtain a sample from a data stream sequentially in a single pass. A stochastic thinning algorithm using reservoir sampling is proposed, and it can be embedded in most Markov chain Monte Carlo methods to reduce the autocorrelation among the generated sample. The distribution of the sample generated by the proposed sampling algorithm converges in total variation to the target distribution in probability under mild conditions. A practical method is introduced to detect the convergence of the proposed sampling algorithm. Two simulation studies are conducted to compare the proposed sampling algorithm and the corresponding Markov chain Monte Carlo methods without thinning, and results show that the estimation bias of the proposed sampling algorithm is approximately the same as the corresponding Markov chain Monte Carlo method, but the proposed sampling algorithm has a smaller Monte Carlo variance. The proposed sampling algorithm saves computer memory in the sense that the storage of a small portion of the Markov chain is required in each iteration.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Zhonglei, 2019. "Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling using a reservoir method," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 64-74.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:139:y:2019:i:c:p:64-74
    DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2019.05.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167947319301124
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.csda.2019.05.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. W. R. Gilks & N. G. Best & K. K. C. Tan, 1995. "Adaptive Rejection Metropolis Sampling Within Gibbs Sampling," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 44(4), pages 455-472, December.
    2. Mark Girolami & Ben Calderhead, 2011. "Riemann manifold Langevin and Hamiltonian Monte Carlo methods," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 73(2), pages 123-214, March.
    3. Roberts, G. O. & Gilks, W. R., 1994. "Convergence of Adaptive Direction Sampling," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 49(2), pages 287-298, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tore Selland Kleppe, 2016. "Adaptive Step Size Selection for Hessian-Based Manifold Langevin Samplers," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 43(3), pages 788-805, September.
    2. Emmanuel C. Mamatzakis & Mike G. Tsionas, 2020. "Revealing forecaster's preferences: A Bayesian multivariate loss function approach," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(3), pages 412-437, April.
    3. Rigat, F. & Mira, A., 2012. "Parallel hierarchical sampling: A general-purpose interacting Markov chains Monte Carlo algorithm," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(6), pages 1450-1467.
    4. Atkinson, Scott E. & Tsionas, Mike G., 2021. "Generalized estimation of productivity with multiple bad outputs: The importance of materials balance constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 292(3), pages 1165-1186.
    5. Jia Liu & John M. Maheu & Yong Song, 2024. "Identification and forecasting of bull and bear markets using multivariate returns," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(5), pages 723-745, August.
    6. Dimitrakopoulos, Stefanos & Tsionas, Mike, 2019. "Ordinal-response GARCH models for transaction data: A forecasting exercise," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 1273-1287.
    7. Bauwens, Luc & Bos, Charles S. & van Dijk, Herman K. & van Oest, Rutger D., 2004. "Adaptive radial-based direction sampling: some flexible and robust Monte Carlo integration methods," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 123(2), pages 201-225, December.
    8. Vanhatalo, Jarno & Veneranta, Lari & Hudd, Richard, 2012. "Species distribution modeling with Gaussian processes: A case study with the youngest stages of sea spawning whitefish (Coregonus lavaretus L. s.l.) larvae," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 49-58.
    9. Will Penny & Biswa Sengupta, 2016. "Annealed Importance Sampling for Neural Mass Models," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(3), pages 1-25, March.
    10. Zarezadeh Zakarya & Costantini Giovanni, 2019. "Particle diffusion Monte Carlo (PDMC)," Monte Carlo Methods and Applications, De Gruyter, vol. 25(2), pages 121-130, June.
    11. Michael L. Polemis & Mike G. Tsionas, 2019. "Bayesian nonlinear panel cointegration: an empirical application to the EKC hypothesis," Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 113-120, August.
    12. repec:jss:jstsof:07:i04 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Agudze, Komla M. & Billio, Monica & Casarin, Roberto & Ravazzolo, Francesco, 2022. "Markov switching panel with endogenous synchronization effects," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 230(2), pages 281-298.
    14. Arnak S. Dalalyan, 2017. "Theoretical guarantees for approximate sampling from smooth and log-concave densities," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 79(3), pages 651-676, June.
    15. Tsionas, Mike G. & Izzeldin, Marwan, 2018. "Smooth approximations to monotone concave functions in production analysis: An alternative to nonparametric concave least squares," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(3), pages 797-807.
    16. Dimitris Korobilis & Davide Pettenuzzo, 2020. "Machine Learning Econometrics: Bayesian algorithms and methods," Papers 2004.11486, arXiv.org.
    17. Manabu Asai & Michael McAleer & Jun Yu, 2006. "Multivariate Stochastic Volatility," Microeconomics Working Papers 22058, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    18. Li, Kan & Luo, Sheng, 2019. "Bayesian functional joint models for multivariate longitudinal and time-to-event data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 14-29.
    19. Carlos A. Abanto-Valle & Gabriel Rodríguez & Hernán B. Garrafa-Aragón, 2020. "Stochastic Volatility in Mean: Empirical Evidence from Stock Latin American Markets," Documentos de Trabajo / Working Papers 2020-481, Departamento de Economía - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.
    20. Shao, Wei & Guo, Guangbao & Meng, Fanyu & Jia, Shuqin, 2013. "An efficient proposal distribution for Metropolis–Hastings using a B-splines technique," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 465-478.
    21. Anzarut, Michelle & Mena, Ramsés H., 2019. "A Harris process to model stochastic volatility," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 10(C), pages 151-169.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:139:y:2019:i:c:p:64-74. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.