IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v133y2019icp245-256.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Default priors for the intercept parameter in logistic regressions

Author

Listed:
  • Boonstra, Philip S.
  • Barbaro, Ryan P.
  • Sen, Ananda

Abstract

In logistic regression, separation occurs when a linear combination of predictors perfectly discriminates the binary outcome. Because finite-valued maximum likelihood parameter estimates do not exist under separation, Bayesian regressions with informative shrinkage of the regression coefficients offer a suitable alternative. Classical studies of separation imply that efficiency in estimating regression coefficients may also depend upon the choice of intercept prior, yet relatively little focus has been given on whether and how to shrink the intercept parameter.Alternative prior distributions for the intercept are proposed that downweight implausibly extreme regions of the parameter space, rendering regression estimates that are less sensitive to separation. Through simulation and the analysis of exemplar datasets, differences across priors stratified by established statistics measuring the degree of separation are quantified. Relative to diffuse priors, these proposed priors generally yield more efficient estimation of the regression coefficients themselves when the data are nearly separated. They are equally efficient in non-separated datasets, making them suitable for default use. Modest differences were observed with respect to out-of-sample discrimination.These numerical studies also highlight the interplay between priors for the intercept and the regression coefficients:findings are more sensitive to the choice of intercept prior when using a weakly informative prior on the regression coefficients than an informative shrinkage prior.

Suggested Citation

  • Boonstra, Philip S. & Barbaro, Ryan P. & Sen, Ananda, 2019. "Default priors for the intercept parameter in logistic regressions," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 245-256.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:133:y:2019:i:c:p:245-256
    DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2018.10.014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167947318302755
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.csda.2018.10.014?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christmann, Andreas & Rousseeuw, Peter J., 2001. "Measuring overlap in binary regression," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 65-75, July.
    2. Carpenter, Bob & Gelman, Andrew & Hoffman, Matthew D. & Lee, Daniel & Goodrich, Ben & Betancourt, Michael & Brubaker, Marcus & Guo, Jiqiang & Li, Peter & Riddell, Allen, 2017. "Stan: A Probabilistic Programming Language," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 76(i01).
    3. Carlos M. Carvalho & Nicholas G. Polson & James G. Scott, 2010. "The horseshoe estimator for sparse signals," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 97(2), pages 465-480.
    4. repec:dau:papers:123456789/1906 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Zorn, Christopher, 2005. "A Solution to Separation in Binary Response Models," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 13(2), pages 157-170, April.
    6. Park, Trevor & Casella, George, 2008. "The Bayesian Lasso," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 103, pages 681-686, June.
    7. Rainey, Carlisle, 2016. "Dealing with Separation in Logistic Regression Models," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24(3), pages 339-355, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Posch, Konstantin & Truden, Christian & Hungerländer, Philipp & Pilz, Jürgen, 2022. "A Bayesian approach for predicting food and beverage sales in staff canteens and restaurants," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 321-338.
    2. Niloy Biswas & Anirban Bhattacharya & Pierre E. Jacob & James E. Johndrow, 2022. "Coupling‐based convergence assessment of some Gibbs samplers for high‐dimensional Bayesian regression with shrinkage priors," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 84(3), pages 973-996, July.
    3. Martin Feldkircher & Florian Huber & Gary Koop & Michael Pfarrhofer, 2022. "APPROXIMATE BAYESIAN INFERENCE AND FORECASTING IN HUGE‐DIMENSIONAL MULTICOUNTRY VARs," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 63(4), pages 1625-1658, November.
    4. Hauzenberger, Niko, 2021. "Flexible Mixture Priors for Large Time-varying Parameter Models," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 87-108.
    5. Hu, Guanyu, 2021. "Spatially varying sparsity in dynamic regression models," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 17(C), pages 23-34.
    6. Lee Anthony & Caron Francois & Doucet Arnaud & Holmes Chris, 2012. "Bayesian Sparsity-Path-Analysis of Genetic Association Signal using Generalized t Priors," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 11(2), pages 1-31, January.
    7. Michael Pfarrhofer, 2024. "Forecasts with Bayesian vector autoregressions under real time conditions," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(3), pages 771-801, April.
    8. Anindya Bhadra & Jyotishka Datta & Nicholas G. Polson & Brandon T. Willard, 2020. "Global-Local Mixtures: A Unifying Framework," Sankhya A: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 82(2), pages 426-447, August.
    9. Yu Bai & Andrea Carriero & Todd E. Clark & Massimiliano Marcellino, 2022. "Macroeconomic forecasting in a multi‐country context," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(6), pages 1230-1255, September.
    10. Mani Suleiman & Haydar Demirhan & Leanne Boyd & Federico Girosi & Vural Aksakalli, 2019. "Bayesian logistic regression approaches to predict incorrect DRG assignment," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 364-375, June.
    11. Gefang, Deborah & Koop, Gary & Poon, Aubrey, 2023. "Forecasting using variational Bayesian inference in large vector autoregressions with hierarchical shrinkage," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 346-363.
    12. Hannaford, Naomi E. & Heaps, Sarah E. & Nye, Tom M.W. & Curtis, Thomas P. & Allen, Ben & Golightly, Andrew & Wilkinson, Darren J., 2023. "A sparse Bayesian hierarchical vector autoregressive model for microbial dynamics in a wastewater treatment plant," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    13. Posch, Konstantin & Arbeiter, Maximilian & Pilz, Juergen, 2020. "A novel Bayesian approach for variable selection in linear regression models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    14. Gregor Kastner & Florian Huber, 2020. "Sparse Bayesian vector autoregressions in huge dimensions," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(7), pages 1142-1165, November.
    15. Uddin, Md Nazir & Gaskins, Jeremy T., 2023. "Shared Bayesian variable shrinkage in multinomial logistic regression," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    16. van Erp, Sara & Oberski, Daniel L. & Mulder, Joris, 2018. "Shrinkage priors for Bayesian penalized regression," OSF Preprints cg8fq, Center for Open Science.
    17. Kshitij Khare & Malay Ghosh, 2022. "MCMC Convergence for Global-Local Shrinkage Priors," Journal of Quantitative Economics, Springer;The Indian Econometric Society (TIES), vol. 20(1), pages 211-234, September.
    18. Jing Zhou & Anirban Bhattacharya & Amy H. Herring & David B. Dunson, 2015. "Bayesian Factorizations of Big Sparse Tensors," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 110(512), pages 1562-1576, December.
    19. Deborah Gefang & Gary Koop & Aubrey Poon, 2019. "Variational Bayesian Inference in Large Vector Autoregressions with Hierarchical Shrinkage," Economic Statistics Centre of Excellence (ESCoE) Discussion Papers ESCoE DP-2019-07, Economic Statistics Centre of Excellence (ESCoE).
    20. David Kohns & Tibor Szendrei, 2021. "Decoupling Shrinkage and Selection for the Bayesian Quantile Regression," Papers 2107.08498, arXiv.org.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:133:y:2019:i:c:p:245-256. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.