IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/chsofr/v42y2009i4p2439-2449.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Controlling chaos through local knowledge

Author

Listed:
  • Naimzada, Ahmad K.
  • Tramontana, Fabio

Abstract

We propose a duopoly game where quantity-setting firms have incomplete information about the demand function. At each time step, they solve a profit maximization problem assuming a linear local approximation of the demand function. In particular, we construct an example using the well known Puu’s model with isoelastic demand function and constant marginal costs. An explicit form of the dynamical system that describes the time evolution of the duopoly game with boundedly rational players is given. The main result is the global stability of the system.

Suggested Citation

  • Naimzada, Ahmad K. & Tramontana, Fabio, 2009. "Controlling chaos through local knowledge," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 42(4), pages 2439-2449.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:42:y:2009:i:4:p:2439-2449
    DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2009.03.109
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960077909002409
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.chaos.2009.03.109?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Naimzada, Ahmad K. & Sbragia, Lucia, 2006. "Oligopoly games with nonlinear demand and cost functions: Two boundedly rational adjustment processes," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 707-722.
    2. Bischi, Gian Italo & Naimzada, Ahmad K. & Sbragia, Lucia, 2007. "Oligopoly games with Local Monopolistic Approximation," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 62(3), pages 371-388, March.
    3. Rand, David, 1978. "Exotic phenomena in games and duopoly models," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 5(2), pages 173-184, September.
    4. Jan Tuinstra, 2004. "A Price Adjustment Process In A Model Of Monopolistic Competition," International Game Theory Review (IGTR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 6(03), pages 417-442.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andrea Caravaggio & Mauro Sodini, 2018. "Heterogeneous players in a Cournot model with differentiated products," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 41(2), pages 277-295, November.
    2. Cavalli, Fausto & Naimzada, Ahmad, 2016. "Complex dynamics and multistability with increasing rationality in market games," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 151-161.
    3. Cerboni Baiardi, Lorenzo & Naimzada, Ahmad K., 2018. "An oligopoly model with best response and imitation rules," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 336(C), pages 193-205.
    4. Fausto Cavalli & Ahmad Naimzada & Marina Pireddu, 2015. "Effects of Size, Composition, and Evolutionary Pressure in Heterogeneous Cournot Oligopolies with Best Response Decisional Mechanisms," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2015, pages 1-17, May.
    5. Lorenzo Cerboni Baiardi & Ahmad K. Naimzada, 2018. "An evolutionary model with best response and imitative rules," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 41(2), pages 313-333, November.
    6. Lorenzo Cerboni Baiardi & Ahmad K. Naimzada, 2019. "An evolutionary Cournot oligopoly model with imitators and perfect foresight best responders," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 70(3), pages 458-475, July.
    7. Xiaoliang Li, 2021. "Analysis of stability and bifurcation for two heterogeneous triopoly games with the isoelastic demand," Papers 2112.05950, arXiv.org.
    8. Cerboni Baiardi, Lorenzo & Naimzada, Ahmad K., 2019. "An oligopoly model with rational and imitation rules," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 254-278.
    9. Cavalli, Fausto & Naimzada, Ahmad & Pireddu, Marina, 2015. "Heterogeneity and the (de)stabilizing role of rationality," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 226-244.
    10. Anna Agliari & Ahmad Naimzada & Nicolò Pecora, 2017. "Nonlinear monetary policy rules in a pure exchange overlapping generations model," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 27(5), pages 1181-1203, November.
    11. Xiaoliang Li & Bo Li, 2023. "A Bertrand duopoly game with differentiated products reconsidered," Papers 2301.01007, arXiv.org.
    12. Tramontana, Fabio, 2010. "Heterogeneous duopoly with isoelastic demand function," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 350-357, January.
    13. Yang, Xuenan & Peng, Yu & Xiao, Yue & Wu, Xue, 2019. "Nonlinear dynamics of a duopoly Stackelberg game with marginal costs," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 185-191.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gian Italo Bischi & Fabio Lamantia & Davide Radi, 2018. "Evolutionary oligopoly games with heterogeneous adaptive players," Chapters, in: Luis C. Corchón & Marco A. Marini (ed.), Handbook of Game Theory and Industrial Organization, Volume I, chapter 12, pages 343-370, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. Askar, S.S. & Alnowibet, K., 2016. "Nonlinear oligopolistic game with isoelastic demand function: Rationality and local monopolistic approximation," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 15-22.
    3. Kopányi, Dávid, 2017. "The coexistence of stable equilibria under least squares learning," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 277-300.
    4. Cars H. Hommes & Marius I. Ochea & Jan Tuinstra, 2018. "Evolutionary Competition Between Adjustment Processes in Cournot Oligopoly: Instability and Complex Dynamics," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 8(4), pages 822-843, December.
    5. Lorenzo Cerboni Baiardi & Ahmad K. Naimzada, 2018. "An evolutionary model with best response and imitative rules," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 41(2), pages 313-333, November.
    6. Ahmad Naimzada & Fabio Tramontana, 2011. "Double route to chaos in an heterogeneous triopoly game," Quaderni di Dipartimento 149, University of Pavia, Department of Economics and Quantitative Methods.
    7. Cerboni Baiardi, Lorenzo & Naimzada, Ahmad K., 2018. "An oligopoly model with best response and imitation rules," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 336(C), pages 193-205.
    8. Naimzada, Ahmad & Ricchiuti, Giorgio, 2011. "Monopoly with local knowledge of demand function," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 28(1-2), pages 299-307, January.
    9. Mikhail Anufriev & Davide Radi & Fabio Tramontana, 2018. "Some reflections on past and future of nonlinear dynamics in economics and finance," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 41(2), pages 91-118, November.
    10. Andrea Caravaggio & Mauro Sodini, 2018. "Heterogeneous players in a Cournot model with differentiated products," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 41(2), pages 277-295, November.
    11. Cerboni Baiardi, Lorenzo & Naimzada, Ahmad K., 2019. "An oligopoly model with rational and imitation rules," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 254-278.
    12. Lorenzo Cerboni Baiardi & Ahmad K. Naimzada, 2019. "An evolutionary Cournot oligopoly model with imitators and perfect foresight best responders," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 70(3), pages 458-475, July.
    13. Zhu, Yan-lan & Zhou, Wei & Chu, Tong, 2022. "Analysis of complex dynamical behavior in a mixed duopoly model with heterogeneous goods," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    14. Yu Yu & Weisheng Yu, 2019. "The Complexion of Multi-period Stackelberg Triopoly Game with Bounded Rationality," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 53(1), pages 457-478, January.
    15. S. S. Askar & A. Al-khedhairi, 2019. "Cournot Duopoly Games: Models and Investigations," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(11), pages 1-15, November.
    16. Ruben Geer & Arnoud V. Boer & Christopher Bayliss & Christine S. M. Currie & Andria Ellina & Malte Esders & Alwin Haensel & Xiao Lei & Kyle D. S. Maclean & Antonio Martinez-Sykora & Asbjørn Nilsen Ris, 2019. "Dynamic pricing and learning with competition: insights from the dynamic pricing challenge at the 2017 INFORMS RM & pricing conference," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 18(3), pages 185-203, June.
    17. Peng, Yu & Lu, Qian, 2015. "Complex dynamics analysis for a duopoly Stackelberg game model with bounded rationality," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 271(C), pages 259-268.
    18. Sarah Mignot & Fabio Tramontana & Frank Westerhoff, 2024. "Complex dynamics in a nonlinear duopoly model with heuristic expectation formation and learning behavior," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 337(3), pages 809-834, June.
    19. Sameh S Askar & Abdulrahman Al-Khedhairi, 2020. "Local and Global Dynamics of a Constraint Profit Maximization for Bischi–Naimzada Competition Duopoly Game," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-16, August.
    20. Bischi, Gian Italo & Lamantia, Fabio & Radi, Davide, 2015. "An evolutionary Cournot model with limited market knowledge," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 219-238.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • L13 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Oligopoly and Other Imperfect Markets
    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
    • C61 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Optimization Techniques; Programming Models; Dynamic Analysis
    • C62 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Existence and Stability Conditions of Equilibrium

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:42:y:2009:i:4:p:2439-2449. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thayer, Thomas R. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/chaos-solitons-and-fractals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.