IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/chsofr/v188y2024ics0960077924011019.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantitative analysis of limit cycles in two-stroke oscillators with exponential functions based on Perturbation Incremental Method

Author

Listed:
  • Ke, Qiaoqiao
  • Wang, Hailing
  • Chen, Zhang
  • Li, Junhua
  • Lin, Yezhi

Abstract

In the quantitative analysis of limit cycles, dealing with the exponential function (ex) poses significant challenges. To address this, the exponential function is incorporated into the perturbation incremental method (PIM) and expanded as part of equation into Taylor series and Fourier series. This study comprehensively presents the implementation details of PIM with the exponential function. Subsequently, approximate expressions for limit cycles are derived based on four types of two-stroke oscillators characterized by distinct functions proposed by Le Corbeiller, Van der Pol, and De Figueiredo. Relationships between the positions of these characteristic functions and the resulting limit cycles are also investigated. Quantitatively, it is demonstrated that the characteristic function intersects the x-axis at exactly one point within the limit cycle range of the two-stroke oscillator, excluding the origin. Moreover, it is observed that for a nonlinear parameter where 0.5<λ<0.6, a particular type of two-stroke oscillation transitions into a four-stroke oscillation due to an increase in the number of intersections with the x-axis from one to two within the limit cycle range. Finally, the results indicate that the approximate expressions of the limit cycles obtained through PIM closely match those obtained from numerical algorithms such as the Runge–Kutta method.

Suggested Citation

  • Ke, Qiaoqiao & Wang, Hailing & Chen, Zhang & Li, Junhua & Lin, Yezhi, 2024. "Quantitative analysis of limit cycles in two-stroke oscillators with exponential functions based on Perturbation Incremental Method," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:188:y:2024:i:c:s0960077924011019
    DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2024.115549
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960077924011019
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.chaos.2024.115549?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Deniz, Sinan, 2021. "Optimal perturbation iteration method for solving fractional FitzHugh-Nagumo equation," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    2. Sordi, Serena & Dávila-Fernández, Marwil J., 2022. "A two-stroke growth cycle model for a small open economy," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    3. Sasakura, Kazuyuki, 1996. "The business cycle model with a unique stable limit cycle," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 20(9-10), pages 1763-1773.
    4. Ginoux, Jean-Marc & Meucci, Riccardo & Euzzor, Stefano & Garbo, Angelo Di, 2021. "Torus breakdown in a two-stroke relaxation memristor," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 153(P2).
    5. He, Ji-Huan & Jiao, Man-Li & Gepreel, Khaled A. & Khan, Yasir, 2023. "Homotopy perturbation method for strongly nonlinear oscillators," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 243-258.
    6. R. M. Goodwin, 1982. "Essays in Economic Dynamics," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-1-349-05504-3, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Giancarlo Gandolfo, 2015. "The Tobin tax in a continuous-time non-linear dynamic model of the exchange rate," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 39(6), pages 1629-1643.
    2. Michaël Assous & Vincent Carret, 2021. "Relaxation oscillations in the early development of econometrics: coming (almost) full circle (1929-1951)," Working Papers halshs-03206795, HAL.
    3. Geoff Harcourt, 2011. "On the Concept of Period and Run in Economic Theory," Discussion Papers 2011-11, School of Economics, The University of New South Wales.
    4. Sasakura, Kazuyuki, 1996. "The business cycle model with a unique stable limit cycle," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 20(9-10), pages 1763-1773.
    5. Frédéric Lordon, 1995. "Cycles et chaos dans un modèle hétérodoxe de croissance endogène," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 46(6), pages 1405-1432.
    6. Giuseppe Catturi, 2022. "L?azienda ? organismo resiliente. Le possibili reazioni alle crisi economiche," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2022(3), pages 177-202.
    7. Hiroki Murakami, 2019. "A note on the “unique” business cycle in the Keynesian theory," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 70(3), pages 384-404, July.
    8. Marwil J. Dávila‐Fernández & Serena Sordi, 2024. "Thirlwall's law: Binding constraint or ‘centre‐of‐gravity’?," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 75(1), pages 52-82, February.
    9. Barnett, William A. & Serletis, Apostolos & Serletis, Demitre, 2015. "Nonlinear And Complex Dynamics In Economics," Macroeconomic Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(8), pages 1749-1779, December.
    10. Luis A. Aguirre & Antonio Aguirre, 1997. "A tutorial introduction to nonlinear dynamics in economics," Nova Economia, Economics Department, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (Brazil), vol. 7(2), pages 9-47.
    11. Joao Ricardo Faria, 2000. "Integrating Tobin's Q with Goodwin's Nonlinear Accelerator," Working Paper Series 104, Finance Discipline Group, UTS Business School, University of Technology, Sydney.
    12. Jochen Jungeilges & Tatyana Ryazanova, 2018. "Output volatility and savings in a stochastic Goodwin economy," Eurasian Economic Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 8(3), pages 355-380, December.
    13. Moreira, Helmar Nunes & Araujo, Ricardo Azevedo & Flaschel, Peter, 2014. "The Foley Liquidity / Profit-Rate Cycle Model Reconsidered," MPRA Paper 54808, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. W D A Bryant, 2009. "General Equilibrium:Theory and Evidence," World Scientific Books, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., number 6875, September.
    15. Roy, Tapas & Maiti, Dilip K., 2024. "General approach on the best fitted linear operator and basis function for homotopy methods and application to strongly nonlinear oscillators," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 220(C), pages 44-64.
    16. Murakami, Hiroki, 2020. "Monetary policy in the unique growth cycle of post Keynesian systems," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 39-49.
    17. Alim, Md. Abdul & Kawser, M. Abul, 2023. "Illustration of the homotopy perturbation method to the modified nonlinear single degree of freedom system," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    18. Neil Hart & Peter Kriesler, 2015. "Post-Keynesian Economics: A User's Guide," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 48(3), pages 321-332, September.
    19. Matsumoto, Akio, 2009. "Note on Goodwin's 1951 nonlinear accelerator model with an investment delay," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 832-842, April.
    20. Landesmann, M.A. & Stehrer, R., 2006. "Goodwin's structural economic dynamics: Modelling Schumpeterian and Keynesian insights," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 17(4), pages 501-524, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:188:y:2024:i:c:s0960077924011019. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thayer, Thomas R. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/chaos-solitons-and-fractals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.