IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/chsofr/v185y2024ics0960077924007136.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of payoff expectation in evolutionary game based on Bush–Mosteller model

Author

Listed:
  • Han, Zhen
  • Wu, Wenning
  • Song, Qun
  • Zhu, Peican

Abstract

In both human society and natural systems, clustered groups often exhibit “experience” or “learning” effects. Thus, individuals’ decisions are often influenced based on their past experiences. However, the social dilemma of fostering and sustaining cooperation through “experience” or “learning” effects in the decision-making process of behavioral evolution has been largely overlooked. Scholars primarily focus on the evolution of behavioral decision-making through changes in decision-making processes and associated benefits. Despite existing research showing the difficulty for individuals to achieve cooperation through “experience” or “learning” effects. This paper aims to simplify and enhance the behavioral decision-making evolution model based on prior research. Building on previous research, the Bush–Mosteller (BM) model will be utilized to analyze the behavior of individual agents in evolutionary games by assigning benefit expectations within the model. The results indicate that profit expectation A, as defined in the BM model, can effectively foster cooperative behavior among individuals within a specific numerical range with the introduction of altruism u. Additionally, this highlights the direct impact of the threshold of expectation A on enhancing cooperative behavior.

Suggested Citation

  • Han, Zhen & Wu, Wenning & Song, Qun & Zhu, Peican, 2024. "Analysis of payoff expectation in evolutionary game based on Bush–Mosteller model," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:185:y:2024:i:c:s0960077924007136
    DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2024.115161
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960077924007136
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.chaos.2024.115161?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:185:y:2024:i:c:s0960077924007136. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thayer, Thomas R. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/chaos-solitons-and-fractals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.