IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/chsofr/v129y2019icp77-80.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of expansion of priority range on cooperation in the prisoner's dilemma game

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Qiuling
  • Du, Chunpeng

Abstract

The exploration of cooperative evolution is one of the biggest challenges in evolutionary biology and social sciences. However, most existing research only assumes that the neighboring communities engaging in interaction and replacement are symmetric, and that each individual has the same number of replacement neighbors. In this paper, we consider an asymmetrical setup, namely, the number of interactive neighbors for some individuals is quite different from the number of their replacement neighbors in the system, turning that into a prisoner's dilemma model with an optimal selection mechanism. In our model, the crowd is divided into two categories, one type of person (V of the proportion of the population), have the right to choose a strategic learning model from eight neighbors by an optimal selection behavior, others only choose a strategic learning model from four neighbors. Through numerical simulation, we found that cooperation was significantly improved when V took a larger value. We explain that results depends on the microscopic phenomena.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Qiuling & Du, Chunpeng, 2019. "Impact of expansion of priority range on cooperation in the prisoner's dilemma game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 77-80.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:129:y:2019:i:c:p:77-80
    DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2019.07.051
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960077919303030
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.chaos.2019.07.051?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li, Zhibin & Jia, Danyang & Guo, Hao & Geng, Yini & Shen, Chen & Wang, Zhen & Li, Xuelong, 2019. "The effect of multigame on cooperation in spatial network," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 351(C), pages 162-167.
    2. Liu, Jinzhuo & Meng, Haoran & Wang, Wei & Xie, Zhongwen & Yu, Qian, 2019. "Evolution of cooperation on independent networks: The influence of asymmetric information sharing updating mechanism," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 340(C), pages 234-241.
    3. Matjaž Perc & Zhen Wang, 2010. "Heterogeneous Aspirations Promote Cooperation in the Prisoner's Dilemma Game," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(12), pages 1-8, December.
    4. Zhen Wang & Marko Jusup & Lei Shi & Joung-Hun Lee & Yoh Iwasa & Stefano Boccaletti, 2018. "Exploiting a cognitive bias promotes cooperation in social dilemma experiments," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-7, December.
    5. K. M. Ariful Kabir & Jun Tanimoto & Zhen Wang, 2018. "Influence of bolstering network reciprocity in the evolutionary spatial Prisoner’s Dilemma game: a perspective," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 91(12), pages 1-10, December.
    6. repec:nas:journl:v:115:y:2018:p:30-35 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Guo, Tian & Guo, Mi & Zhang, Yan & Liang, Shuanglu, 2019. "The effect of aspiration on the evolution of cooperation in spatial multigame," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 525(C), pages 27-32.
    8. Chu, Chen & Zhai, Yao & Mu, Chunjiang & Hu, Die & Li, Tong & Shi, Lei, 2019. "Reputation-based popularity promotes cooperation in the spatial prisoner's dilemma game," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 362(C), pages 1-1.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gao, Liyan & Pan, Qiuhui & He, Mingfeng, 2021. "Environmental-based defensive promotes cooperation in the prisoner’s dilemma game," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 401(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wu, Yu’e & Zhang, Zhipeng & Wang, Xinyu & Yan, Ming & Zhang, Qingfeng & Zhang, Shuhua, 2021. "Evolution of cooperation in the multigame on a two-layer square network," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 400(C).
    2. Bin, Liu & Yue, Wu, 2023. "Co-evolution of reputation-based preference selection and resource allocation with multigame on interdependent networks," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 456(C).
    3. Sun, Chengbin & Luo, Chao, 2020. "Co-evolution of influence-based preferential selection and limited resource with multi-games on interdependent networks," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 374(C).
    4. Li, Jiaqi & Zhang, Jianlei & Chen, Zengqiang & Liu, Qun, 2023. "Aspiration drives adaptive switching between two different payoff matrices," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 446(C).
    5. Geng, Yini & Liu, Yifan & Lu, Yikang & Shen, Chen & Shi, Lei, 2022. "Reinforcement learning explains various conditional cooperation," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 427(C).
    6. Mao, Yajun & Rong, Zhihai & Wu, Zhi-Xi, 2021. "Effect of collective influence on the evolution of cooperation in evolutionary prisoner’s dilemma games," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 392(C).
    7. Deng, Xinyang & Jiang, Wen & Wang, Zhen, 2020. "An Information Source Selection Model Based on Evolutionary Game Theory," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 385(C).
    8. Deng, Zheng-Hong & Wang, Zi-Ren & Wang, Huan-Bo & Huang, Yijie, 2021. "Impact of informers on the evolution of cooperation in prisoner's dilemma game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    9. Zhang, Lan & Xie, Yuan & Huang, Changwei & Li, Haihong & Dai, Qionglin, 2020. "Heterogeneous investments induced by historical payoffs promote cooperation in spatial public goods games," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    10. Wu, Yu’e & Zhang, Zhipeng & Yang, Guoli & Liu, Haixin & Zhang, Qingfeng, 2022. "Evolution of cooperation driven by diversity on a double-layer square lattice," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    11. Deng, Zheng-Hong & Wang, Zi-Ren & Wang, Huan-Bo & Xu, Lin, 2021. "The evolution of cooperation in multi-games with popularity-driven fitness calculation," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    12. Shi, Juan & Hu, Die & Tao, Rui & Peng, Yunchen & Li, Yong & Liu, Jinzhuo, 2021. "Interaction between populations promotes cooperation in voluntary prisoner's dilemma," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 392(C).
    13. Chu, Chen & Cui, Simin & Yuan, Zheng & Yu, Chunbin, 2022. "A win-stay-lose-learn mechanism based on aspiration can promote cooperation in a multigame," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    14. Li, Shulan & Hong, Lijun & Geng, Yini & Shen, Chen, 2020. "Popularity-driven fitness calculation promotes cooperation in spatial prisoner’s dilemma game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    15. Wang, Zi-Ren & Deng, Zheng-Hong & Wang, Huan-Bo & Qu, Yun, 2021. "Moderate irrational sentiment-driven fitness can promote cooperation in the prisoner’s dilemma game," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 584(C).
    16. Yang, Xuenan & Peng, Yu & Xiao, Yue & Wu, Xue, 2019. "Nonlinear dynamics of a duopoly Stackelberg game with marginal costs," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 185-191.
    17. Cheng, Yuan & Xue, Yanbo & Chang, Meng, 2020. "Career choice as an extended spatial evolutionary public goods game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    18. Sun, Peng & Zhang, Jun, 2020. "Group decision under uncertain information," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    19. Zhang, Zaisheng & Song, Fang & Song, Zongbin, 2020. "Promoting knowledge sharing in the workplace: Punishment v. reward," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    20. Xu, Jiwei & Deng, Zhenghong & Song, Qun & Chi, Qian & Wu, Tao & Huang, Yijie & Liu, Dan & Gao, Mingyu, 2020. "Multi-UAV counter-game model based on uncertain information," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 366(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:129:y:2019:i:c:p:77-80. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thayer, Thomas R. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/chaos-solitons-and-fractals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.