IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/bushor/v38y1995i1p78-84.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How important is physical collocation to product development success?

Author

Listed:
  • Rafii, Farshad

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Rafii, Farshad, 1995. "How important is physical collocation to product development success?," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 78-84.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:bushor:v:38:y:1995:i:1:p:78-84
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0007-6813(95)90107-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ketokivi, Mikko, 2006. "When Does Co-location of Manufacturing and R&D Matter?," Discussion Papers 1051, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
    2. Lee Patti, Anthony & Gilbert, James Patrick, 1997. "Collocating new product development teams: why, when, where, and how?," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 40(6), pages 59-64.
    3. Swink, Morgan L. & Sandvig, J. Christopher & Mabert, Vincent A., 1996. "Adding "zip" to product development: Concurrent engineering methods and tools," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 41-49.
    4. Pawar, Kulwant S. & Sharifi, Sudi, 1997. "Physical or virtual team collocation: Does it matter?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(3), pages 283-290, October.
    5. Christophe Van den Bulte & Rudy K. Moenaert, 1998. "The Effects of R&D Team Co-location on Communication Patterns among R&D, Marketing, and Manufacturing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(11-Part-2), pages 1-18, November.
    6. Yang Liu, 2019. "Promoting cross-border knowledge transfer for new product development in MNCs: a process view," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 802-821, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:bushor:v:38:y:1995:i:1:p:78-84. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/bushor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.