IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v378y2025ipas0306261924021093.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Two sides of a coin: Assessing trade-offs between reliability and profit in mini grids and the policy implications for subsidies

Author

Listed:
  • Maqelepo, Lefu
  • Wamalwa, Fhazhil
  • Williams, Nathan
  • Taneja, Jay

Abstract

Universal access to electricity is an important milestone featured in countries development plans. It is well understood within the energy practitioner and research communities that to reach this milestone, distributed energy resources, especially mini grids, are to play a crucial role as they represent a least cost alternative to reach most rural communities. The success of mini grids though is highly reliant on favorable policies, particularly regulations pertaining to tariffs (i.e., electricity rates). In this research, we use Tanzania as a case study to investigate the likely consequences of grid and mini grid tariff equalization regulation which ignores the fact that the tariff charged on the grid is highly subsidized compared to mini grid tariffs that must be cost reflective for mini grid utilities to be financially sustainable. We recognize that a private mini grid operator has an obligation to make profits for the investors. Because of this, they have two critical yet divergent operating points from which to choose: (1) serving 100% of the demand at all times, potentially incurring operating losses during some periods and (2) partially serving the demand to maximize returns, potentially compromising customer satisfaction. Using an empirically-informed model of a mini grid sized to minimize net present cost that supplies power to 500 customers, we quantify the cost of reliability between these two key operating points and trace the curve relating profit and reliability, for two types of load scenarios: fixed loads and fixed plus flexible loads. We found that profit is optimized at a reliability of 92.3% and 86.0% for systems that meet fixed loads and fixed plus flexible loads respectively. This reduced reliability can have crucial implications on the viability of mini grids for providing electricity access, as customer dissatisfaction and profits may erode. We show that under the policy of tariff equalization between the centralized grid and mini grids, the latter is challenged to survive and therefore the communities which are being served through mini grids may experience de-electrification, which would represent a huge regression with regards to meeting the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 7 (SDG7) of universal electricity access.

Suggested Citation

  • Maqelepo, Lefu & Wamalwa, Fhazhil & Williams, Nathan & Taneja, Jay, 2025. "Two sides of a coin: Assessing trade-offs between reliability and profit in mini grids and the policy implications for subsidies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 378(PA).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:378:y:2025:i:pa:s0306261924021093
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.124726
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261924021093
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.124726?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:378:y:2025:i:pa:s0306261924021093. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.