IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v375y2024ics0306261924014636.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Continuous model calibration framework for smart-building digital twin: A generative model-based approach

Author

Listed:
  • Eneyew, Dagimawi D.
  • Capretz, Miriam A.M.
  • Bitsuamlak, Girma T.

Abstract

Smart building digital twins represent a significant paradigm shift to optimize building operations, thereby reducing their substantial energy consumption and emissions through digitalization. The objective is to virtually replicate existing buildings’ static and dynamic aspects, leveraging data, information, and models spanning the entire life cycle. The virtual replica can then be employed for intelligent functions, including real-time monitoring, autonomous control, and proactive decision-making to optimize building operations. To enable proactive decisions, models within the digital twin must continually evolve with changes in the physical building, aligning their outputs with real-time measurements through calibration. This continuous updating requires real-time physical measurements of model inputs. However, challenges arise in the uncertain conditions of buildings marked by sensor absence, malfunctions, and inherent limitations in measuring certain variables. This study introduces a novel calibration framework for physics-based models, addressing the challenges of continuous model calibration in smart-building digital twins while considering the uncertain environment of physical buildings. Within this framework, a novel generative model-based architecture is proposed. This architecture enables a fast and scalable solution while quantifying uncertainty for reliable calibration. Furthermore, a continuous model calibration procedure is presented based on a pre-trained generative calibrator model. A comprehensive evaluation was conducted via a case study employing a building energy model and multiple experiments. The experimental results demonstrated that the proposed framework effectively addresses the challenges of continuous model calibration in smart-building digital twins. The calibrator model accurately quantified uncertainties in its predictions and solved a single calibration problem in an average time of 0.043 second. For facility-level electricity consumption, Coefficient of Variation Root Mean Squared Error (CVRMSE) values of 6.33%, 10.18%, and 10.97% were achieved under conditions of observations without noise or missing data, with noise, and with noise and missing data, respectively. Similarly, for facility-level gas consumption, the corresponding values were 18.75%, 20.53%, and 20.7%. The CVRMSE scores in both cases met the standard hourly thresholds for building energy model calibration.

Suggested Citation

  • Eneyew, Dagimawi D. & Capretz, Miriam A.M. & Bitsuamlak, Girma T., 2024. "Continuous model calibration framework for smart-building digital twin: A generative model-based approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 375(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:375:y:2024:i:c:s0306261924014636
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.124080
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261924014636
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.124080?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nagpal, Shreshth & Hanson, Jared & Reinhart, Christoph, 2019. "A framework for using calibrated campus-wide building energy models for continuous planning and greenhouse gas emissions reduction tracking," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C), pages 82-97.
    2. Østergård, Torben & Jensen, Rasmus Lund & Maagaard, Steffen Enersen, 2018. "A comparison of six metamodeling techniques applied to building performance simulations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 89-103.
    3. Zhang, Qiang & Tian, Zhe & Ma, Zhijun & Li, Genyan & Lu, Yakai & Niu, Jide, 2020. "Development of the heating load prediction model for the residential building of district heating based on model calibration," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    4. Shuangshuang Chen & Wei Guo, 2023. "Auto-Encoders in Deep Learning—A Review with New Perspectives," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-54, April.
    5. Tilmann Gneiting & Fadoua Balabdaoui & Adrian E. Raftery, 2007. "Probabilistic forecasts, calibration and sharpness," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 69(2), pages 243-268, April.
    6. Gneiting, Tilmann & Raftery, Adrian E., 2007. "Strictly Proper Scoring Rules, Prediction, and Estimation," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 102, pages 359-378, March.
    7. Chen, Jianli & Gao, Xinghua & Hu, Yuqing & Zeng, Zhaoyun & Liu, Yanan, 2019. "A meta-model-based optimization approach for fast and reliable calibration of building energy models," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    8. Wang, Siyan & Sun, Xun & Lall, Upmanu, 2017. "A hierarchical Bayesian regression model for predicting summer residential electricity demand across the U.S.A," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 601-611.
    9. Tian, Shen & Shao, Shuangquan & Liu, Bin, 2019. "Investigation on transient energy consumption of cold storages: Modeling and a case study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 1-9.
    10. Yuan, Jun & Nian, Victor & Su, Bin & Meng, Qun, 2017. "A simultaneous calibration and parameter ranking method for building energy models," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 657-666.
    11. Koo, Jabeom & Yoon, Sungmin, 2022. "In-situ sensor virtualization and calibration in building systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 325(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gael M. Martin & David T. Frazier & Ruben Loaiza-Maya & Florian Huber & Gary Koop & John Maheu & Didier Nibbering & Anastasios Panagiotelis, 2023. "Bayesian Forecasting in the 21st Century: A Modern Review," Monash Econometrics and Business Statistics Working Papers 1/23, Monash University, Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics.
    2. Martin, Gael M. & Frazier, David T. & Maneesoonthorn, Worapree & Loaiza-Maya, Rubén & Huber, Florian & Koop, Gary & Maheu, John & Nibbering, Didier & Panagiotelis, Anastasios, 2024. "Bayesian forecasting in economics and finance: A modern review," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 811-839.
    3. Zhu, Chuanqi & Tian, Wei & Yin, Baoquan & Li, Zhanyong & Shi, Jiaxin, 2020. "Uncertainty calibration of building energy models by combining approximate Bayesian computation and machine learning algorithms," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    4. Warne, Anders, 2023. "DSGE model forecasting: rational expectations vs. adaptive learning," Working Paper Series 2768, European Central Bank.
    5. Lahiri, Kajal & Yang, Liu, 2013. "Forecasting Binary Outcomes," Handbook of Economic Forecasting, in: G. Elliott & C. Granger & A. Timmermann (ed.), Handbook of Economic Forecasting, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 0, pages 1025-1106, Elsevier.
    6. Jenny Brynjarsdottir & Jonathan Hobbs & Amy Braverman & Lukas Mandrake, 2018. "Optimal Estimation Versus MCMC for $$\mathrm{{CO}}_{2}$$ CO 2 Retrievals," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 23(2), pages 297-316, June.
    7. Michael K. Adjemian & Valentina G. Bruno & Michel A. Robe, 2020. "Incorporating Uncertainty into USDA Commodity Price Forecasts," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 102(2), pages 696-712, March.
    8. Warne, Anders & Coenen, Günter & Christoffel, Kai, 2010. "Forecasting with DSGE models," Working Paper Series 1185, European Central Bank.
    9. Nowotarski, Jakub & Weron, Rafał, 2018. "Recent advances in electricity price forecasting: A review of probabilistic forecasting," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 1548-1568.
    10. Tilmann Gneiting & Larissa Stanberry & Eric Grimit & Leonhard Held & Nicholas Johnson, 2008. "Rejoinder on: Assessing probabilistic forecasts of multivariate quantities, with an application to ensemble predictions of surface winds," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 17(2), pages 256-264, August.
    11. Emilio Zanetti Chini, 2018. "Forecasters’ utility and forecast coherence," CREATES Research Papers 2018-23, Department of Economics and Business Economics, Aarhus University.
    12. Sigrist, Fabio & Leuenberger, Nicola, 2023. "Machine learning for corporate default risk: Multi-period prediction, frailty correlation, loan portfolios, and tail probabilities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(3), pages 1390-1406.
    13. Mike Ludkovski & Glen Swindle & Eric Grannan, 2022. "Large Scale Probabilistic Simulation of Renewables Production," Papers 2205.04736, arXiv.org.
    14. Theo S. Eicher & Chris Papageorgiou & Adrian E. Raftery, 2011. "Default priors and predictive performance in Bayesian model averaging, with application to growth determinants," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(1), pages 30-55, January/F.
    15. Yang, Dazhi & van der Meer, Dennis, 2021. "Post-processing in solar forecasting: Ten overarching thinking tools," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    16. Geweke, John & Amisano, Gianni, 2011. "Optimal prediction pools," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 164(1), pages 130-141, September.
    17. Tsyplakov, Alexander, 2010. "The links between inflation and inflation uncertainty at the longer horizon," MPRA Paper 26908, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Lenza, Michele & Moutachaker, Inès & Paredes, Joan, 2023. "Density forecasts of inflation: a quantile regression forest approach," CEPR Discussion Papers 18298, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    19. Song, Haiyan & Wen, Long & Liu, Chang, 2019. "Density tourism demand forecasting revisited," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 379-392.
    20. Luisa Bisaglia & Matteo Grigoletto, 2021. "A new time-varying model for forecasting long-memory series," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 30(1), pages 139-155, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:375:y:2024:i:c:s0306261924014636. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.