IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v364y2024ics0306261924004896.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strategic interaction among distribution network operator and residential end-users via distribution use of system charges in demand-side management environment

Author

Listed:
  • Mishra, Mrityunjay Kumar
  • Al-Sumaiti, Ameena Saad
  • Murari, Krishna
  • Parida, S.K.
  • Jaafari, Khaled Al

Abstract

Price-based demand side management involves end-users responding to per-slot energy prices to optimize their energy consumption and reduce bills. The per-slot energy price constitutes distribution use of system charges which makeup 19%–24% of it. Existing work primarily focuses on the interaction between distribution network operators, larger storage/generation facilities, and prosumers overlooking the fairness of tariff structures used to recover distribution network operators’ revenue. This oversight leads to unfair pricing for end-users, as it disregards factors such as the distance power must travel and the utilization of devices like transformers and transmission lines. This study employ the MW-Miles Distribution use of System Charges charging methodology to address this issue and designs a method to couple per-slot energy price to distribution use of system charges, considering distribution network operator as market players in a Stackelberg game framework. Two cases are devised to update distribution network operator-controlled parameters, with three perturbation strategies discussed for each case. The interaction between independent end-users is modeled using a noncooperative game framework, analyzing Nash equilibrium existence and algorithm convergence. An IEEE-33 bus system with residential end-users, home appliances, distributed energy storage, and dispatchable distributed generation is chosen for analysis. To account for end-user discomfort due to power-shiftable devices, a discomfort objective is included alongside energy bill savings. The results demonstrate a 7.67% increase in distribution network operators’ revenue when actively participating in demand-side management program compared to its passive role as a utility.

Suggested Citation

  • Mishra, Mrityunjay Kumar & Al-Sumaiti, Ameena Saad & Murari, Krishna & Parida, S.K. & Jaafari, Khaled Al, 2024. "Strategic interaction among distribution network operator and residential end-users via distribution use of system charges in demand-side management environment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 364(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:364:y:2024:i:c:s0306261924004896
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.123106
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261924004896
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.123106?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jalali, Mehdi & Zare, Kazem & Seyedi, Heresh, 2017. "Strategic decision-making of distribution network operator with multi-microgrids considering demand response program," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 1059-1071.
    2. Park, Sung-Won & Zhang, Zhong & Li, Furong & Son, Sung-Yong, 2021. "Peer-to-peer trading-based efficient flexibility securing mechanism to support distribution system stability," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    3. Avau, Michiel & Govaerts, Niels & Delarue, Erik, 2021. "Impact of distribution tariffs on prosumer demand response," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    4. Dynge, Marthe Fogstad & Crespo del Granado, Pedro & Hashemipour, Naser & Korpås, Magnus, 2021. "Impact of local electricity markets and peer-to-peer trading on low-voltage grid operations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 301(C).
    5. Yao, Wenliang & Wang, Chengfu & Yang, Ming & Wang, Kang & Dong, Xiaoming & Zhang, Zhenwei, 2023. "A tri-layer decision-making framework for IES considering the interaction of integrated demand response and multi-energy market clearing," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 342(C).
    6. Yoon, Ah-Yun & Kim, Young-Jin & Zakula, Tea & Moon, Seung-Ill, 2020. "Retail electricity pricing via online-learning of data-driven demand response of HVAC systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    7. Lo Prete, Chiara & Hobbs, Benjamin F., 2016. "A cooperative game theoretic analysis of incentives for microgrids in regulated electricity markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 524-541.
    8. Babagheibi, Mahsa & Jadid, Shahram & Kazemi, Ahad, 2023. "An Incentive-based robust flexibility market for congestion management of an active distribution system to use the free capacity of Microgrids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 336(C).
    9. Nguyen, Hai-Tra & Safder, Usman & Loy-Benitez, Jorge & Yoo, ChangKyoo, 2022. "Optimal demand side management scheduling-based bidirectional regulation of energy distribution network for multi-residential demand response with self-produced renewable energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 322(C).
    10. Zhang, Chunyu & Wang, Qi & Wang, Jianhui & Korpås, Magnus & Khodayar, Mohammad E., 2016. "Strategy-making for a proactive distribution company in the real-time market with demand response," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 540-548.
    11. Schittekatte, Tim & Momber, Ilan & Meeus, Leonardo, 2018. "Future-proof tariff design: Recovering sunk grid costs in a world where consumers are pushing back," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 484-498.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Babagheibi, Mahsa & Jadid, Shahram & Kazemi, Ahad, 2023. "An Incentive-based robust flexibility market for congestion management of an active distribution system to use the free capacity of Microgrids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 336(C).
    2. Stute, Judith & Klobasa, Marian, 2024. "How do dynamic electricity tariffs and different grid charge designs interact? - Implications for residential consumers and grid reinforcement requirements," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    3. Longxi Li, 2020. "Optimal Coordination Strategies for Load Service Entity and Community Energy Systems Based on Centralized and Decentralized Approaches," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-22, June.
    4. Pena-Bello, Alejandro & Junod, Robin & Ballif, Christophe & Wyrsch, Nicolas, 2023. "Balancing DSO interests and PV system economics with alternative tariffs," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    5. Ibrahim Abada & Andreas Ehrenmann & Xavier Lambin, 2018. "Unintended consequences: The snowball effect of energy communities," Working Papers EPRG 1812, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    6. Azim, M. Imran & Tushar, Wayes & Saha, Tapan K. & Yuen, Chau & Smith, David, 2022. "Peer-to-peer kilowatt and negawatt trading: A review of challenges and recent advances in distribution networks," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    7. Fernando García-Muñoz & Mariana Jiménez-Martínez & Josh Eichman & Cristina Corchero & Gabriela Benveniste, 2024. "Exploring the Viability of Local Electricity Markets for Managing Congestion in Spanish Distribution Networks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-18, January.
    8. Hussain, Sadam & Azim, M. Imran & Lai, Chunyan & Eicker, Ursula, 2023. "New coordination framework for smart home peer-to-peer trading to reduce impact on distribution transformer," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    9. Sun, Lu & Xu, Qingshan & Song, Yun, 2022. "Game-theoretic genetic-priced optimization of multiple microgrids under uncertainties," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 426(C).
    10. Yiqi Dong & Zuoji Dong, 2023. "Bibliometric Analysis of Game Theory on Energy and Natural Resource," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-19, January.
    11. Deng Xu & Yong Long, 2019. "The Impact of Government Subsidy on Renewable Microgrid Investment Considering Double Externalities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-15, June.
    12. Shahmohammadi, Ali & Sioshansi, Ramteen & Conejo, Antonio J. & Afsharnia, Saeed, 2018. "Market equilibria and interactions between strategic generation, wind, and storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C), pages 876-892.
    13. Javier Borquez & Hector Chavez & Karina A. Barbosa & Marcela Jamett & Rodrigo Acuna, 2020. "A Simple Distribution Energy Tariff under the Penetration of DG," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-17, April.
    14. Chen, Houhe & Wang, Di & Zhang, Rufeng & Jiang, Tao & Li, Xue, 2022. "Optimal participation of ADN in energy and reserve markets considering TSO-DSO interface and DERs uncertainties," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 308(C).
    15. Wu, Chun & Chen, Xingying & Hua, Haochen & Yu, Kun & Gan, Lei & Shen, Jun & Ding, Yi, 2024. "Peer-to-peer energy trading optimization for community prosumers considering carbon cap-and-trade," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 358(C).
    16. Li, Qiang & Gao, Mengkai & Lin, Houfei & Chen, Ziyu & Chen, Minyou, 2019. "MAS-based distributed control method for multi-microgrids with high-penetration renewable energy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 284-295.
    17. Christoph Schick & Nikolai Klempp & Kai Hufendiek, 2021. "Impact of Network Charge Design in an Energy System with Large Penetration of Renewables and High Prosumer Shares," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-26, October.
    18. Abada, I. & Ehrenmann, A. & Lambin, X., 2017. "On the viability of energy communities," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1740, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    19. Jingpeng Yue & Zhijian Hu & Amjad Anvari-Moghaddam & Josep M. Guerrero, 2019. "A Multi-Market-Driven Approach to Energy Scheduling of Smart Microgrids in Distribution Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-16, January.
    20. Timothé Beaufils & Pierre-Olivier Pineau, 2018. "Structures tarifaires et spirale de la mort : État des lieux des pratiques de tarification dans la distribution d’électricité résidentielle," CIRANO Working Papers 2018s-27, CIRANO.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:364:y:2024:i:c:s0306261924004896. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.