IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v332y2023ics0306261922017494.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating alternative low carbon fuel technologies using a stakeholder participation-based q-rung orthopair linguistic multi-criteria framework

Author

Listed:
  • Yang, Zaoli
  • Ahmad, Salman
  • Bernardi, Andrea
  • Shang, Wen-long
  • Xuan, Jin
  • Xu, Bing

Abstract

It is widely believed that alternative low carbon fuels (ALCF) can be instrumental in achieving the transportation sector’s decarbonization goal. Unlike conventional fossil-based fuels, ALCF can be produced through a combination of different chemical processes and feedstocks. The inherent complexity of the problem justifies the multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach to support decision-making in the presence of multiple criteria and data uncertainty. In this paper, we propose a novel stakeholder participation-based MCDM framework integrating experts' perspectives on ALCF production pathways using the analytics hierarchy process (AHP) and the q-rung orthopair linguistic partition Bonferroni mean (q-ROLPBM) operator. The key merit of our approach lies in treating criteria of different dimensions as heterogeneous indicators while considering the mutual influence between criteria within the same dimension. The proposed framework is applied to evaluate four ALCF production pathways against 13 criteria categorised under economic, environmental, technical, and social dimensions for the case of the United Kingdom (UK). Our analysis revealed the environmental and the economic dimensions to be the most important, followed by the social and technical evaluation dimensions. The e-fuel followed by the e-biofuel are found to be the two top-ranked production pathways that utilise the electrochemical reduction process and its combination with anaerobic digestion. These findings, along with our recommendations, provide decision-makers with guidelines on ALCF production pathway selection and formulate effective policies for investment.

Suggested Citation

  • Yang, Zaoli & Ahmad, Salman & Bernardi, Andrea & Shang, Wen-long & Xuan, Jin & Xu, Bing, 2023. "Evaluating alternative low carbon fuel technologies using a stakeholder participation-based q-rung orthopair linguistic multi-criteria framework," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 332(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:332:y:2023:i:c:s0306261922017494
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.120492
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261922017494
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.120492?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peide Liu & Junlin Liu & Shyi-Ming Chen, 2018. "Some intuitionistic fuzzy Dombi Bonferroni mean operators and their application to multi-attribute group decision making," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 69(1), pages 1-24, January.
    2. Baudry, Gino & Macharis, Cathy & Vallée, Thomas, 2018. "Range-based Multi-Actor Multi-Criteria Analysis: A combined method of Multi-Actor Multi-Criteria Analysis and Monte Carlo simulation to support participatory decision making under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(1), pages 257-269.
    3. Baudry, Gino & Macharis, Cathy & Vallée, Thomas, 2018. "Can microalgae biodiesel contribute to achieve the sustainability objectives in the transport sector in France by 2030? A comparison between first, second and third generation biofuels though a range-," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 1032-1046.
    4. Fiorese, Giulia & Catenacci, Michela & Verdolini, Elena & Bosetti, Valentina, 2013. "Advanced biofuels: Future perspectives from an expert elicitation survey," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 293-311.
    5. Xu, Bing & Nayak, Amar & Gray, David & Ouenniche, Jamal, 2016. "Assessing energy business cases implemented in the North Sea Region and strategy recommendations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 360-371.
    6. Lopez-Behar, Diana & Tran, Martino & Froese, Thomas & Mayaud, Jerome R. & Herrera, Omar E. & Merida, Walter, 2019. "Charging infrastructure for electric vehicles in Multi-Unit Residential Buildings: Mapping feedbacks and policy recommendations," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 444-451.
    7. Mukhamet, Tileuzhan & Kobeyev, Sultan & Nadeem, Abid & Memon, Shazim Ali, 2021. "Ranking PCMs for building façade applications using multi-criteria decision-making tools combined with energy simulations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(PB).
    8. Ahmad, Salman & Ouenniche, Jamal & Kolosz, Ben W. & Greening, Philip & Andresen, John M. & Maroto-Valer, M. Mercedes & Xu, Bing, 2021. "A stakeholders’ participatory approach to multi-criteria assessment of sustainable aviation fuels production pathways," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 238(C).
    9. Ganesh, Ibram, 2016. "Electrochemical conversion of carbon dioxide into renewable fuel chemicals – The role of nanomaterials and the commercialization," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 1269-1297.
    10. Mark D. Staples & Robert Malina & Steven R. H. Barrett, 2017. "The limits of bioenergy for mitigating global life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuels," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 2(2), pages 1-8, February.
    11. Peide Liu & Xinli You, 2018. "Some linguistic neutrosophic Hamy mean operators and their application to multi-attribute group decision making," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(3), pages 1-26, March.
    12. Ghaib, Karim & Ben-Fares, Fatima-Zahrae, 2018. "Power-to-Methane: A state-of-the-art review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 433-446.
    13. Arora, Amit & Singh, Vijay, 2020. "Biodiesel production from engineered sugarcane lipids under uncertain feedstock compositions: Process design and techno-economic analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    14. Liu, Boying & Shumway, C. Richard & Yoder, Jonathan K., 2017. "Lifecycle economic analysis of biofuels: Accounting for economic substitution in policy assessment," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 146-158.
    15. Shafiei, Ehsan & Davidsdottir, Brynhildur & Leaver, Jonathan & Stefansson, Hlynur & Asgeirsson, Eyjolfur Ingi, 2014. "Potential impact of transition to a low-carbon transport system in Iceland," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 127-142.
    16. Yang, Zaoli & Shang, Wen-Long & Zhang, Haoran & Garg, Harish & Han, Chunjia, 2022. "Assessing the green distribution transformer manufacturing process using a cloud-based q-rung orthopair fuzzy multi-criteria framework," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    17. Narwane, Vaibhav S. & Yadav, Vinay Surendra & Raut, Rakesh D. & Narkhede, Balkrishna E. & Gardas, Bhaskar B., 2021. "Sustainable development challenges of the biofuel industry in India based on integrated MCDM approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 298-309.
    18. Kargbo, Hannah & Harris, Jonathan Stuart & Phan, Anh N., 2021. "“Drop-in” fuel production from biomass: Critical review on techno-economic feasibility and sustainability," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    19. Joel Y. Y. Loh & Nazir P. Kherani & Geoffrey A. Ozin, 2021. "Persistent CO2 photocatalysis for solar fuels in the dark," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 4(6), pages 466-473, June.
    20. Ridha, Hussein Mohammed & Gomes, Chandima & Hizam, Hashim & Ahmadipour, Masoud & Heidari, Ali Asghar & Chen, Huiling, 2021. "Multi-objective optimization and multi-criteria decision-making methods for optimal design of standalone photovoltaic system: A comprehensive review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    21. Benzhen Yao & Tiancun Xiao & Ofentse A. Makgae & Xiangyu Jie & Sergio Gonzalez-Cortes & Shaoliang Guan & Angus I. Kirkland & Jonathan R. Dilworth & Hamid A. Al-Megren & Saeed M. Alshihri & Peter J. Do, 2020. "Transforming carbon dioxide into jet fuel using an organic combustion-synthesized Fe-Mn-K catalyst," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, December.
    22. Hermesmann, M. & Grübel, K. & Scherotzki, L. & Müller, T.E., 2021. "Promising pathways: The geographic and energetic potential of power-to-x technologies based on regeneratively obtained hydrogen," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    23. Sehatpour, Mohammad-Hadi & Kazemi, Aliyeh & Sehatpour, Hesam-eddin, 2017. "Evaluation of alternative fuels for light-duty vehicles in Iran using a multi-criteria approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 295-310.
    24. Cabrera-Jiménez, Richard & Mateo-Sanz, Josep M. & Gavaldà, Jordi & Jiménez, Laureano & Pozo, Carlos, 2022. "Comparing biofuels through the lens of sustainability: A data envelopment analysis approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    25. Ahmad, Salman & Nadeem, Abid & Akhanova, Gulzhanat & Houghton, Tom & Muhammad-Sukki, Firdaus, 2017. "Multi-criteria evaluation of renewable and nuclear resources for electricity generation in Kazakhstan," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 1880-1891.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Raghunathan Krishankumar & Arunodaya Raj Mishra & Pratibha Rani & Fausto Cavallaro & Kattur Soundarapandian Ravichandran, 2023. "A Novel Integrated q-Rung Fuzzy Framework for Biomass Location Selection with No Apriori Weight Choices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, February.
    2. Zeb, Aurang & Ahmad, Waseem & Asif, Muhammad & Simic, Vladimir & Senapati, Tapan & Hou, Muzhou, 2024. "Optimizing decision-making in electric power system selection: A generalized approach based on Hamacher aggregation operators for q-rung orthopair fuzzy soft sets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 367(C).
    3. Eleni Strantzali & Georgios A. Livanos & Konstantinos Aravossis, 2023. "A Comprehensive Multicriteria Evaluation Approach for Alternative Marine Fuels," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-21, November.
    4. Ebadi Torkayesh, Ali & Hendiani, Sepehr & Walther, Grit & Venghaus, Sandra, 2024. "Fueling the future: Overcoming the barriers to market development of renewable fuels in Germany using a novel analytical approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 316(3), pages 1012-1033.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ahmad, Salman & Ouenniche, Jamal & Kolosz, Ben W. & Greening, Philip & Andresen, John M. & Maroto-Valer, M. Mercedes & Xu, Bing, 2021. "A stakeholders’ participatory approach to multi-criteria assessment of sustainable aviation fuels production pathways," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 238(C).
    2. Liangping Wu & Guiwu Wei & Hui Gao & Yu Wei, 2018. "Some Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Dombi Hamy Mean Operators and Their Application for Evaluating the Elderly Tourism Service Quality in Tourism Destination," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 6(12), pages 1-20, December.
    3. Bhandari, Ramchandra, 2022. "Green hydrogen production potential in West Africa – Case of Niger," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 800-811.
    4. Jiahuan He & Xindi Wang & Runtong Zhang & Li Li, 2019. "Some q -Rung Picture Fuzzy Dombi Hamy Mean Operators with Their Application to Project Assessment," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-28, May.
    5. Li, Junjie & Zhang, Yueling & Yang, Yanli & Zhang, Xiaomei & Wang, Nana & Zheng, Yonghong & Tian, Yajun & Xie, Kechang, 2022. "Life cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis of ethanol production via coal and its competitors: A comparative study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 312(C).
    6. Yuan, Jiahang & Luo, Xinggang & Li, Yun & Hu, Xiaoqing & Chen, Wenchong & Zhang, Yue, 2022. "Multi criteria decision-making for distributed energy system based on multi-source heterogeneous data," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PD).
    7. Alejandro Ortega & Konstantinos Gkoumas & Anastasios Tsakalidis & Ferenc Pekár, 2021. "Low-Emission Alternative Energy for Transport in the EU: State of Play of Research and Innovation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-22, November.
    8. Viole, Isabelle & Valenzuela-Venegas, Guillermo & Sartori, Sabrina & Zeyringer, Marianne, 2024. "Integrated life cycle assessment in off-grid energy system design—Uncovering low hanging fruit for climate mitigation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 367(C).
    9. Liu, Xinglei & Liu, Jun & Ren, Kezheng & Liu, Xiaoming & Liu, Jiacheng, 2022. "An integrated fuzzy multi-energy transaction evaluation approach for energy internet markets considering judgement credibility and variable rough precision," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PB).
    10. Lukáš Dvořáček & Martin Horák & Jaroslav Knápek, 2022. "Simulation of Electric Vehicle Charging Points Based on Efficient Use of Chargers and Using Recuperated Braking Energy from Trains," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-28, January.
    11. Baker, Erin & Bosetti, Valentina & Salo, Ahti, 2016. "Finding Common Ground when Experts Disagree: Belief Dominance over Portfolios of Alternatives," MITP: Mitigation, Innovation and Transformation Pathways 243147, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    12. Athanasios Zisos & Dimitrios Chatzopoulos & Andreas Efstratiadis, 2024. "The Concept of Spatial Reliability Across Renewable Energy Systems—An Application to Decentralized Solar PV Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-18, November.
    13. Cui, Ye & E, Hanyu & Pedrycz, Witold & Fayek, Aminah Robinson, 2022. "A granular multicriteria group decision making for renewable energy planning problems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 1047-1059.
    14. Victor Soto & Claudia Ulloa & Ximena Garcia, 2021. "A CFD Design Approach for Industrial Size Tubular Reactors for SNG Production from Biogas (CO 2 Methanation)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-25, September.
    15. Mostafa Shaaban & Jürgen Scheffran & Jürgen Böhner & Mohamed S. Elsobki, 2018. "Sustainability Assessment of Electricity Generation Technologies in Egypt Using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-25, May.
    16. Olawale Ogunrinde & Ekundayo Shittu, 2023. "Benchmarking performance of photovoltaic power plants in multiple periods," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 43(3), pages 489-503, September.
    17. K. Arunprasath & S. Bathrinath & R. K. A. Bhalaji & Koppiahraj Karuppiah & Anish Nair, 2023. "An integrated approach to modelling of barriers in implementation of cellular manufacturing systems in production industries," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 14(4), pages 1370-1378, August.
    18. Sara Bellocchi & Michele Manno & Michel Noussan & Michela Vellini, 2019. "Impact of Grid-Scale Electricity Storage and Electric Vehicles on Renewable Energy Penetration: A Case Study for Italy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-32, April.
    19. Zheng Yuan & Baohua Wen & Cheng He & Jin Zhou & Zhonghua Zhou & Feng Xu, 2022. "Application of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Analysis to Rural Spatial Sustainability Evaluation: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-31, May.
    20. Kong, Fanying & Ren, Hong-Yu & Pavlostathis, Spyros G. & Nan, Jun & Ren, Nan-Qi & Wang, Aijie, 2020. "Overview of value-added products bioelectrosynthesized from waste materials in microbial electrosynthesis systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:332:y:2023:i:c:s0306261922017494. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.