IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v282y2021ipas0306261920315385.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Utility-scale photovoltaics and storage: Decarbonizing and reducing greenhouse gases abatement costs

Author

Listed:
  • Virguez, Edgar
  • Wang, Xianxun
  • Patiño-Echeverri, Dalia

Abstract

This study explores the performance of the Duke Energy Carolinas/Progress (DEC/DEP) electric power system under one hundred forty-one configurations combining different capacities of utility-scale photovoltaics (PV) and battery energy storage (lithium-ion batteries or BES). The different configurations include PV installations capable of providing 5–25% of the systems energy and batteries with varying duration (energy-to-power ratio) of 2, 4, and 6 h. A production cost model comprised of a day-ahead unit commitment and a real-time economic dispatch simulates the optimal operation of all the generation resources necessary to supply hourly demand and reserve requirements during the year 2016. The model represents in detail the generation fleet of the system, including 221 nuclear, natural gas, coal and hydro power generators with a combined installed capacity of 37.8 GW. Results indicate that: 1) adding BES to a power system that includes PV further reduces carbon dioxide emissions while also lowering the cost of carbon abatement. 2) The optimal power rating of a BES system that supports PV seems to be lower than 25% of the capacity of the PV. 3) BES of short duration (2-h) are more cost-effective (i.e., result in a lower cost of abatement) when the level of PV penetration is low (lower than ~12.5%), while BES of longer duration (6-h) are more cost-effective when there are larger shares of PV. 4) The installation of optimal configurations of PV + BES to reduce carbon emissions in the DEC/DEP system by ~14–57% would increase the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) ~8–65%. 5) If projections of declining costs for the next decade materialize, the installation of up to 15 GW of PV + 1.88 GW / 3.76 GWh of BES would reduce the LCOE while achieving up to 33% reduction in carbon emissions.

Suggested Citation

  • Virguez, Edgar & Wang, Xianxun & Patiño-Echeverri, Dalia, 2021. "Utility-scale photovoltaics and storage: Decarbonizing and reducing greenhouse gases abatement costs," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(PA).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:282:y:2021:i:pa:s0306261920315385
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116120
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261920315385
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116120?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Noah Kittner & Felix Lill & Daniel M. Kammen, 2017. "Energy storage deployment and innovation for the clean energy transition," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 2(9), pages 1-6, September.
    2. Jacobson, Mark Z. & Delucchi, Mark A. & Ingraffea, Anthony R. & Howarth, Robert W. & Bazouin, Guillaume & Bridgeland, Brett & Burkart, Karl & Chang, Martin & Chowdhury, Navid & Cook, Roy & Escher, Giu, 2014. "A roadmap for repowering California for all purposes with wind, water, and sunlight," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 875-889.
    3. Alqahtani, Bandar Jubran & Patiño-Echeverri, Dalia, 2019. "Combined effects of policies to increase energy efficiency and distributed solar generation: A case study of the Carolinas," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    4. Mileva, Ana & Johnston, Josiah & Nelson, James H. & Kammen, Daniel M., 2016. "Power system balancing for deep decarbonization of the electricity sector," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1001-1009.
    5. Bandyopadhyay, Rubenka & Patiño-Echeverri, Dalia, 2016. "An alternate wind power integration mechanism: Coal plants with flexible amine-based CCS," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 704-713.
    6. Sioshansi, Ramteen & Denholm, Paul & Jenkin, Thomas & Weiss, Jurgen, 2009. "Estimating the value of electricity storage in PJM: Arbitrage and some welfare effects," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 269-277, March.
    7. Cornelius, Adam & Bandyopadhyay, Rubenka & Patiño-Echeverri, Dalia, 2018. "Assessing environmental, economic, and reliability impacts of flexible ramp products in MISO's electricity market," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 2291-2298.
    8. Becker, Sarah & Frew, Bethany A. & Andresen, Gorm B. & Zeyer, Timo & Schramm, Stefan & Greiner, Martin & Jacobson, Mark Z., 2014. "Features of a fully renewable US electricity system: Optimized mixes of wind and solar PV and transmission grid extensions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 443-458.
    9. Daraeepour, Ali & Patino-Echeverri, Dalia & Conejo, Antonio J., 2019. "Economic and environmental implications of different approaches to hedge against wind production uncertainty in two-settlement electricity markets: A PJM case study," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 336-354.
    10. Kavlak, Goksin & McNerney, James & Trancik, Jessika E., 2018. "Evaluating the causes of cost reduction in photovoltaic modules," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 700-710.
    11. Marcucci, Adriana & Panos, Evangelos & Kypreos, Socrates & Fragkos, Panagiotis, 2019. "Probabilistic assessment of realizing the 1.5 °C climate target," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 239-251.
    12. Frew, Bethany A. & Becker, Sarah & Dvorak, Michael J. & Andresen, Gorm B. & Jacobson, Mark Z., 2016. "Flexibility mechanisms and pathways to a highly renewable US electricity future," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 65-78.
    13. Jenkins, J.D. & Zhou, Z. & Ponciroli, R. & Vilim, R.B. & Ganda, F. & de Sisternes, F. & Botterud, A., 2018. "The benefits of nuclear flexibility in power system operations with renewable energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 872-884.
    14. Denholm, Paul & Hand, Maureen, 2011. "Grid flexibility and storage required to achieve very high penetration of variable renewable electricity," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 1817-1830, March.
    15. Kern, Jordan D. & Patino-Echeverri, Dalia & Characklis, Gregory W., 2014. "An integrated reservoir-power system model for evaluating the impacts of wind integration on hydropower resources," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 553-562.
    16. Davis, Steven J & Lewis, Nathan S. & Shaner, Matthew & Aggarwal, Sonia & Arent, Doug & Azevedo, Inês & Benson, Sally & Bradley, Thomas & Brouwer, Jack & Chiang, Yet-Ming & Clack, Christopher T.M. & Co, 2018. "Net-Zero Emissions Energy Systems," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt7qv6q35r, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    17. Bradbury, Kyle & Pratson, Lincoln & Patiño-Echeverri, Dalia, 2014. "Economic viability of energy storage systems based on price arbitrage potential in real-time U.S. electricity markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 512-519.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yuan, Meng & Sorknæs, Peter & Lund, Henrik & Liang, Yongtu, 2022. "The bidding strategies of large-scale battery storage in 100% renewable smart energy systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 326(C).
    2. Yu Jiang & Zihua Tang & Xiaoyu Zhang & Chao Wang & Guoliang Song & Qinggang Lyu, 2023. "Comparative Analysis of Combustion Characteristics of a CFB Boiler during the Changes Process between High-Rated Loads and Low-Rated Loads," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-15, August.
    3. Zheng, Likai & Xuan, Yimin, 2021. "Performance estimation of a V-shaped perovskite/silicon tandem device: A case study based on a bifacial heterojunction silicon cell," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 301(C).
    4. Mehedi, Tanveer Hassan & Gemechu, Eskinder & Kumar, Amit, 2022. "Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions and energy footprints of utility-scale solar energy systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 314(C).
    5. Li, Mingquan & Gao, Huiwen & Abdulla, Ahmed & Shan, Rui & Gao, Shuo, 2022. "Combined effects of carbon pricing and power market reform on CO2 emissions reduction in China's electricity sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    6. Choo, Hyunwoong & Kim, Yong-Gun & Kim, Dongwoo, 2024. "Power sector carbon reduction review for South Korea in 2030," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    7. Cui, Wei & Li, Xiangxuan & Li, Xinyi & Lu, Lin & Ma, Ting & Wang, Qiuwang, 2022. "Combined effects of nanoparticles and ultrasonic field on thermal energy storage performance of phase change materials with metal foam," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 309(C).
    8. Li, Mingquan & Shan, Rui & Virguez, Edgar & Patiño-Echeverri, Dalia & Gao, Shuo & Ma, Haichao, 2022. "Energy storage reduces costs and emissions even without large penetration of renewable energy: The case of China Southern Power Grid," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. McPherson, Madeleine & Tahseen, Samiha, 2018. "Deploying storage assets to facilitate variable renewable energy integration: The impacts of grid flexibility, renewable penetration, and market structure," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 856-870.
    2. de Sisternes, Fernando J. & Jenkins, Jesse D. & Botterud, Audun, 2016. "The value of energy storage in decarbonizing the electricity sector," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 368-379.
    3. Blanco, Herib & Faaij, André, 2018. "A review at the role of storage in energy systems with a focus on Power to Gas and long-term storage," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 1049-1086.
    4. Telaretti, E. & Dusonchet, L., 2017. "Stationary battery technologies in the U.S.: Development Trends and prospects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 380-392.
    5. Aghahosseini, Arman & Bogdanov, Dmitrii & Barbosa, Larissa S.N.S. & Breyer, Christian, 2019. "Analysing the feasibility of powering the Americas with renewable energy and inter-regional grid interconnections by 2030," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 187-205.
    6. Shan, Rui & Abdulla, Ahmed & Li, Mingquan, 2021. "Deleterious effects of strategic, profit-seeking energy storage operation on electric power system costs," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    7. Cebulla, F. & Fichter, T., 2017. "Merit order or unit-commitment: How does thermal power plant modeling affect storage demand in energy system models?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 117-132.
    8. Javier L'opez Prol & Wolf-Peter Schill, 2020. "The Economics of Variable Renewables and Electricity Storage," Papers 2012.15371, arXiv.org.
    9. Valerie Eveloy & Tesfaldet Gebreegziabher, 2018. "A Review of Projected Power-to-Gas Deployment Scenarios," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-52, July.
    10. Jacobson, Mark Z. & von Krauland, Anna-Katharina & Coughlin, Stephen J. & Palmer, Frances C. & Smith, Miles M., 2022. "Zero air pollution and zero carbon from all energy at low cost and without blackouts in variable weather throughout the U.S. with 100% wind-water-solar and storage," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 430-442.
    11. Goteti, Naga Srujana & Hittinger, Eric & Sergi, Brian & Lima Azevedo, Inês, 2021. "How does new energy storage affect the operation and revenue of existing generation?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    12. Graditi, G. & Ippolito, M.G. & Telaretti, E. & Zizzo, G., 2016. "Technical and economical assessment of distributed electrochemical storages for load shifting applications: An Italian case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 515-523.
    13. Hansen, Kenneth & Breyer, Christian & Lund, Henrik, 2019. "Status and perspectives on 100% renewable energy systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 471-480.
    14. Gorman, Will & Montañés, Cristina Crespo & Mills, Andrew & Kim, James Hyungkwan & Millstein, Dev & Wiser, Ryan, 2022. "Are coupled renewable-battery power plants more valuable than independently sited installations?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    15. Bistline, John & Blanford, Geoffrey & Mai, Trieu & Merrick, James, 2021. "Modeling variable renewable energy and storage in the power sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    16. Mallapragada, Dharik S. & Sepulveda, Nestor A. & Jenkins, Jesse D., 2020. "Long-run system value of battery energy storage in future grids with increasing wind and solar generation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    17. McPherson, Madeleine & Harvey, L.D. Danny & Karney, Bryan, 2017. "System design and operation for integrating variable renewable energy resources through a comprehensive characterization framework," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1019-1032.
    18. Jenkins, J.D. & Zhou, Z. & Ponciroli, R. & Vilim, R.B. & Ganda, F. & de Sisternes, F. & Botterud, A., 2018. "The benefits of nuclear flexibility in power system operations with renewable energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 872-884.
    19. McConnell, Dylan & Forcey, Tim & Sandiford, Mike, 2015. "Estimating the value of electricity storage in an energy-only wholesale market," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 422-432.
    20. Frew, Bethany A. & Becker, Sarah & Dvorak, Michael J. & Andresen, Gorm B. & Jacobson, Mark Z., 2016. "Flexibility mechanisms and pathways to a highly renewable US electricity future," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 65-78.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:282:y:2021:i:pa:s0306261920315385. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.