IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eneeco/v136y2024ics0140988324004341.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring the energy poverty premium in Great Britain and identifying its main drivers based on longitudinal household survey data

Author

Listed:
  • Rasanga, Fiona
  • Harrison, Tina
  • Calabrese, Raffaella

Abstract

Following the consistent hike in energy prices in recent years, energy affordability by low-income households in Great Britain has become a significant concern. These concerns are further compounded by the disproportionate cost of energy that poor households are likely to pay, compared to the non-poor. In this study, we examine the exposure of poor households to energy premiums by measuring the additional costs incurred and identifying the main drivers. We merge household-level data from Understanding Society with energy consumption data from the National Energy Efficiency Data — Framework (NEED). Using the merged dataset and the Theory of Complaints, we propose a new approach to measuring the poverty premium based on the cost per unit of energy incurred by households. Based on a two-stage regression model, our results show that poorer households are likely to pay premiums for energy consumption. Furthermore, among households who incur these energy premiums, poor households pay higher premiums than non-poor households, incurring a cost of between 10%–20% more per unit for both gas and electricity premiums between 2011 and 2019. These relationships are still significant even after addressing the potential endogeneity of poverty, thereby confirming the relationship between energy premiums and poverty. The results also suggest that the other key drivers of electricity and gas premiums are payment methods used, and household characteristics such as the number of adults per household, presence of children, unemployed adults and pensioners.

Suggested Citation

  • Rasanga, Fiona & Harrison, Tina & Calabrese, Raffaella, 2024. "Measuring the energy poverty premium in Great Britain and identifying its main drivers based on longitudinal household survey data," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:136:y:2024:i:c:s0140988324004341
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107726
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988324004341
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107726?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Energy poverty premium; Inequality; Panel data; Household; Cost of living;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C33 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Models with Panel Data; Spatio-temporal Models
    • Q40 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - General
    • Q48 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Government Policy
    • R2 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Household Analysis

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:136:y:2024:i:c:s0140988324004341. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eneco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.