IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/apmaco/v362y2019ic5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Resolving public goods dilemma by giving the poor more support

Author

Listed:
  • Gao, Bo
  • liu, Xuan
  • Hou, Shuxia
  • Jia, Danyang
  • Du, Mingjing

Abstract

The question of resource allocation has been the focus issue in social and natural science. Should we narrow the gap between the rich and poor? Or should we increase the income inequality? Inspired by this matter, we propose a payoff redistribution model and explore which case can evaluate the cooperative level in public goods game. Specifically, we use a single parameter α to control the above two scenarios. Positive α increases the income inequality between rich and poor, while negative α ensures this equality and the case of α = 0 turns our model to the symmetric case, where there is no payoff redistribution effect. Extensive simulation shows that when we narrow the gap between the rich and poor, cooperation can be maintained, conversely, if this income inequality is increased, the cooperative groups are destroyed. Our work thus provides a novel clue to explore this problem especially from the viewpoint of evolutionary game theory.

Suggested Citation

  • Gao, Bo & liu, Xuan & Hou, Shuxia & Jia, Danyang & Du, Mingjing, 2019. "Resolving public goods dilemma by giving the poor more support," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 362(C), pages 1-1.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:apmaco:v:362:y:2019:i:c:5
    DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2019.06.043
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0096300319305089
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.amc.2019.06.043?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Francisco C. Santos & Marta D. Santos & Jorge M. Pacheco, 2008. "Social diversity promotes the emergence of cooperation in public goods games," Nature, Nature, vol. 454(7201), pages 213-216, July.
    2. Gao, Bo & Liu, Xuan & Lan, Zhongzhou & Fu, Rongrong, 2018. "A novel method for reconstructing period with single input in NFSR," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 36-40.
    3. Zhenhua Pei & Baokui Wang & Jinming Du, 2016. "Effects of income redistribution on the evolution of cooperation in spatial public goods games," Papers 1611.01531, arXiv.org.
    4. repec:nas:journl:v:115:y:2018:p:30-35 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Chunpeng Du & Danyang Jia & Libin Jin & Lei Shi, 2018. "The impact of neutral reward on cooperation in public good game," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 91(10), pages 1-6, October.
    6. Elinor Ostrom, 2000. "Collective Action and the Evolution of Social Norms," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 14(3), pages 137-158, Summer.
    7. Zhen Wang & Marko Jusup & Lei Shi & Joung-Hun Lee & Yoh Iwasa & Stefano Boccaletti, 2018. "Exploiting a cognitive bias promotes cooperation in social dilemma experiments," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-7, December.
    8. Robert J. Smith, 1981. "Resolving the Tragedy of the Commons by Creating Private Property Rights in Wildlife," Cato Journal, Cato Journal, Cato Institute, vol. 1(2), pages 439-468, Fall.
    9. Gao, Bo & Deng, Zheng-hong & Zhao, Da-wei & Song, Qun, 2017. "State analysis of Boolean control networks with impulsive and uncertain disturbances," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 301(C), pages 187-192.
    10. Ernst Fehr & Urs Fischbacher, 2004. "Social norms and human cooperation," Macroeconomics 0409026, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xing Xiong & Xinghou Yu & Yuxin Wang, 2022. "The impact of basic public services on residents’ consumption in China," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-8, December.
    2. Wang, Mengyao & Pan, Qiuhui & He, Mingfeng, 2020. "The interplay of behaviors and attitudes in public goods game considering environmental investment," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 382(C).
    3. Gao, Bo & Liu, Xuan & Lan, Zhong-Zhou & Hong, Jie & Zhang, Wenguang, 2021. "The evolution of cooperation with preferential selection in voluntary public goods game," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 584(C).
    4. Zhang, Shuai & Clark, Ruaridh & Huang, Yunke, 2020. "Frequency-dependent strategy selection in a hunting game with a finite population," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 382(C).
    5. Wang, Jianwei & Xu, Wenshu & Zhang, Xingjian & Zhao, Nianxuan & Yu, Fengyuan, 2023. "Redistribution based on willingness to cooperate promotes cooperation while intensifying equality in heterogeneous populations," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 610(C).
    6. Guang Zhang & Nan He & Yanxia Dong, 2021. "A Proportional-Egalitarian Allocation Policy for Public Goods Problems with Complex Network," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(17), pages 1-12, August.
    7. Wang, Le & Chen, Tong & Wu, Zhenghong, 2021. "Promoting cooperation by reputation scoring mechanism based on historical donations in public goods game," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 390(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gao, Bo & Liu, Xuan & Lan, Zhong-Zhou & Hong, Jie & Zhang, Wenguang, 2021. "The evolution of cooperation with preferential selection in voluntary public goods game," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 584(C).
    2. Li, Jing & Wang, Jiang, 2018. "Locality based wealth rule favors cooperation in costly public goods games," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 1-7.
    3. Quan, Ji & Zhang, Xiyue & Chen, Wenman & Tang, Caixia & Wang, Xianjia, 2024. "Reputation-dependent social learning on the evolution of cooperation in spatial public goods games," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 475(C).
    4. Quan, Ji & Yu, Junyu & Li, Xia & Wang, Xianjia, 2023. "Conditional switching between social excluders and loners promotes cooperation in spatial public goods game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    5. Deng, Zheng-Hong & Wang, Zi-Ren & Wang, Huan-Bo & Xu, Lin, 2021. "The evolution of cooperation in multi-games with popularity-driven fitness calculation," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    6. Quan, Ji & Tang, Caixia & Zhou, Yawen & Wang, Xianjia & Yang, Jian-Bo, 2020. "Reputation evaluation with tolerance and reputation-dependent imitation on cooperation in spatial public goods game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    7. Zheng, Junjun & Ren, Tianyu & Ma, Gang & Dong, Jinhui, 2021. "The emergence and implementation of pool exclusion in spatial public goods game with heterogeneous ability-to-pay," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 394(C).
    8. repec:rza:wpaper:227 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Yang, Xuenan & Peng, Yu & Xiao, Yue & Wu, Xue, 2019. "Nonlinear dynamics of a duopoly Stackelberg game with marginal costs," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 185-191.
    10. Brooks, Jeremy S., 2010. "The Buddha mushroom: Conservation behavior and the development of institutions in Bhutan," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(4), pages 779-795, February.
    11. Liu, Chen & Guo, Hao & Li, Zhibin & Gao, Xiaoyuan & Li, Shudong, 2019. "Coevolution of multi-game resolves social dilemma in network population," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 341(C), pages 402-407.
    12. Bogliacino, Francesco & Codagnone, Cristiano, 2021. "Microfoundations, behaviour, and evolution: Evidence from experiments," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 372-385.
    13. Urs Steiner Brandt, 2008. "What can facilitate cooperation: Fairness, ineaulity aversion, punishment, norms or trust?," Working Papers 80/08, University of Southern Denmark, Department of Sociology, Environmental and Business Economics.
    14. Dehghani, Sedigheh & Nazarimehr, Fahimeh & Jafari, Sajad, 2021. "How can cultural conditions affect society’s decisions?," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 582(C).
    15. Liu, Yandi & Wang, Hexin & Ding, Yi & Yang, Xuan & Dai, Yu, 2022. "Can weak diversity help in propagating cooperation? Invasion of cooperators at the conformity-conflict boundary," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    16. Kurt A. Ackermann & Ryan O. Murphy, 2019. "Explaining Cooperative Behavior in Public Goods Games: How Preferences and Beliefs Affect Contribution Levels," Games, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-34, March.
    17. Chen, Qiao & Chen, Tong & Wang, Yongjie, 2017. "Publishing the donation list incompletely promotes the emergence of cooperation in public goods game," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 310(C), pages 48-56.
    18. Sari, Nazmi, 2013. "On anti-smoking regulations and tobacco consumption," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 60-67.
    19. Jin, Jiahua & Chu, Chen & Shen, Chen & Guo, Hao & Geng, Yini & Jia, Danyang & Shi, Lei, 2018. "Heterogeneous fitness promotes cooperation in the spatial prisoner's dilemma game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 141-146.
    20. Reif, Christiane & Rübbelke, Dirk & Löschel, Andreas, 2014. "Improving voluntary public good provision by a non-governmental, endogenous matching mechanism: Experimental evidence," CAWM Discussion Papers 73, University of Münster, Münster Center for Economic Policy (MEP).
    21. Ritwik Banerjee, 2016. "On the interpretation of bribery in a laboratory corruption game: moral frames and social norms," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 19(1), pages 240-267, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:apmaco:v:362:y:2019:i:c:5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/applied-mathematics-and-computation .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.