IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/apmaco/v250y2015icp759-775.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance comparison of numerical inversion methods for Laplace and Hankel integral transforms in engineering problems

Author

Listed:
  • Raoofian Naeeni, M.
  • Campagna, R.
  • Eskandari-Ghadi, M.
  • Ardalan, Alireza A.

Abstract

Different methods for the numerical evaluations of the inverse Laplace and inverse of joint Laplace–Hankel integral transforms are applied to solve a wide range of initial-boundary value problems often arising in engineering and applied mathematics. The aim of the paper is to present a performance comparison among different numerical methods when they are applied to transformed functions related to actual engineering problems found in the literature. Most of our selected test functions have been found in the solution of boundary value problems of applied mechanics such as those related to transient responses of isotropic and transversely isotropic half-space to concentrated impulse or those related to viscoelastic wave motion in layered media. These classes of test functions are frequently encountered in similar problems such as those in boundary element or boundary integral equations, theoretical seismology, soil–structure-interaction in time domain and so on. Therefore, their behavior with different numerical inversion algorithms could make a useful guide to a precise choice of more suitable inversion method to be used in similar problems. Some different methods are also investigated in detail and compared for the inversion of the joint Hankel–Laplace transforms, where more sophisticated integrand functions are encountered. It is shown that Durbin, Crump, D’Amore, Fixed-Talbot, Gaver–Whyn–Rho (GWR), and Direct Integration methods have excellent performance and produce good results when applied to the same problems. On the contrary, Gaver–Stehfest and Piessens methods furnish results not very reliable for almost all classes of transformed functions and they seem good only for “simple” transformed functions. Particularly the performance of GWR algorithm is very good even for transformed functions with infinite number of singularities, where the other methods fail. In addition, in case of double integral transforms, only the Fixed-Talbot, Durbin and Weeks methods are recommended.

Suggested Citation

  • Raoofian Naeeni, M. & Campagna, R. & Eskandari-Ghadi, M. & Ardalan, Alireza A., 2015. "Performance comparison of numerical inversion methods for Laplace and Hankel integral transforms in engineering problems," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 759-775.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:apmaco:v:250:y:2015:i:c:p:759-775
    DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2014.10.102
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0096300314014775
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.amc.2014.10.102?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. D. P. Gaver, 1966. "Observing Stochastic Processes, and Approximate Transform Inversion," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 14(3), pages 444-459, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Li, Bin & Kang, Hongchao & Chen, Songliang & Ren, Shanjing, 2023. "On the approximation of highly oscillatory Volterra integral equations of the first kind via Laplace transform," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 214(C), pages 92-113.
    2. Campagna, Rosanna & Conti, Costanza & Cuomo, Salvatore, 2020. "Computational error bounds for Laplace transform inversion based on smoothing splines," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 383(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Leippold, Markus & Vasiljević, Nikola, 2017. "Pricing and disentanglement of American puts in the hyper-exponential jump-diffusion model," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 78-94.
    2. Kimura, Toshikazu, 2008. "Valuing finite-lived Russian options," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 189(2), pages 363-374, September.
    3. Gatto, Riccardo, 2013. "The von Mises–Fisher distribution of the first exit point from the hypersphere of the drifted Brownian motion and the density of the first exit time," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 83(7), pages 1669-1676.
    4. Qu, Yan & Dassios, Angelos & Zhao, Hongbiao, 2021. "Random variate generation for exponential and gamma tilted stable distributions," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 108593, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Landriault, David & Willmot, Gordon, 2008. "On the Gerber-Shiu discounted penalty function in the Sparre Andersen model with an arbitrary interclaim time distribution," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 600-608, April.
    6. Lateef T. Akanji & Gabriel K. Falade, 2018. "Closed-Form Solution of Radial Transport of Tracers in Porous Media Influenced by Linear Drift," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-29, December.
    7. Li, Na & Stanford, David A. & Sharif, Azaz B. & Caron, Richard J. & Pardhan, Alim, 2019. "Optimising key performance indicator adherence with application to emergency department congestion," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 272(1), pages 313-323.
    8. Razminia, Kambiz & Razminia, Abolhassan & Torres, Delfim F.M., 2015. "Pressure responses of a vertically hydraulic fractured well in a reservoir with fractal structure," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 257(C), pages 374-380.
    9. Hofert, Marius, 2008. "Sampling Archimedean copulas," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(12), pages 5163-5174, August.
    10. A. Baykal Hafızoğlu & Esma S. Gel & Pınar Keskinocak, 2013. "Expected Tardiness Computations in Multiclass Priority M / M / c Queues," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 25(2), pages 364-376, May.
    11. Wei, Xiaohua & Bai, Sijun & Wu, Bei, 2023. "A novel shock-dependent preventive maintenance policy for degraded systems subject to dynamic environments and N-critical shocks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    12. Efstathios Avdis & Ward Whitt, 2007. "Power Algorithms for Inverting Laplace Transforms," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 19(3), pages 341-355, August.
    13. Qinglai Dong & Lirong Cui & Hongda Gao, 2019. "A bivariate replacement policy for an imperfect repair system based on geometric processes," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 233(4), pages 670-681, August.
    14. Ballestra, Luca Vincenzo & Pacelli, Graziella, 2014. "Valuing risky debt: A new model combining structural information with the reduced-form approach," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 261-271.
    15. Kenkre, V.M. & Spendier, K., 2022. "A theory of coalescence of signaling receptor clusters in immune cells," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 602(C).
    16. Wu, Bei & Zhang, Yamei & Zhao, Songzheng, 2023. "Modeling coupled effects of dynamic environments and zoned shocks on systems under dependent failure processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    17. Jingyuan Shen & Alaa Elwany & Lirong Cui, 2018. "Reliability modeling for systems degrading in K cyclical regimes based on gamma processes," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 232(6), pages 754-765, December.
    18. Ballestra, Luca Vincenzo & Pacelli, Graziella & Radi, Davide, 2020. "Modeling CDS spreads: A comparison of some hybrid approaches," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 107-124.
    19. Tan, Zhizhong & Wu, Bei & Che, Ada, 2023. "Resilience modeling for multi-state systems based on Markov processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    20. Kimura, Toshikazu, 2010. "Valuing continuous-installment options," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(1), pages 222-230, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:apmaco:v:250:y:2015:i:c:p:759-775. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/applied-mathematics-and-computation .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.