IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v267y2022ics0378377422001585.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sap velocity, transpiration and water use efficiency of drip-irrigated cotton in response to chemical topping and row spacing

Author

Listed:
  • Chen, Yongfan
  • Zhang, Zeshan
  • Wang, Xuejiao
  • Sun, Shuai
  • Zhang, Yutong
  • Wang, Sen
  • Yang, Mingfeng
  • Ji, Fen
  • Ji, Chunrong
  • Xiang, Dao
  • Zha, Tianshan
  • Zhang, Lizhen

Abstract

Directly measuring plant transpiration of field crops and determining water use efficiency are difficult but essential to understand plant-water relations. In this study, we aimed to quantify plant transpiration and water use efficiency at diurnal and daily bases using sap flow measurements in cotton growing under plastic film cover and drip irrigation in relation to row configurations and chemical topping. Field experiment was carried out in 2020–2021 in Xinjiang, China. The experiment included two topping treatments: chemical topping using heavy amount of mepiquat chloride and traditional manual topping; and two typical row spacing for machine-harvesting: equal row spacing (76 cm) and narrow-wide row spacing (10 cm + 66 cm). Sap flow was measured using a heat ratio method after cotton first flowering stage and then calculated to transpiration per plant and per unit ground area. Chemical topping increased cotton plant height by 12%, leaf area index by 13%, and stem diameter by 9% but did not affect cotton lint yield compared with manual topping across two years and row configurations. The sap velocity of drip-irrigated cotton ranged overall from 20 to 45 cm hr−1 at the daytime and close to zero at nighttime. Across two years, the daily transpiration in chemical topping after flowering was 5.57 mm d−1 and 14.8% higher than in manual topping. That in narrow-wide row spacing was higher than in equal rows. However, the water use efficiency did not differ between topping and row spacing treatments, being 5.64 kg m−3 on average for aboveground dry matter. This knowledge would be useful to optimize cotton irrigation managements and to improve crop models by knowing exact plant transpiration at both plant and system levels.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen, Yongfan & Zhang, Zeshan & Wang, Xuejiao & Sun, Shuai & Zhang, Yutong & Wang, Sen & Yang, Mingfeng & Ji, Fen & Ji, Chunrong & Xiang, Dao & Zha, Tianshan & Zhang, Lizhen, 2022. "Sap velocity, transpiration and water use efficiency of drip-irrigated cotton in response to chemical topping and row spacing," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:267:y:2022:i:c:s0378377422001585
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107611
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377422001585
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107611?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhao, Hong & Xiong, You-Cai & Li, Feng-Min & Wang, Run-Yuan & Qiang, Sheng-Cai & Yao, Tao-Feng & Mo, Fei, 2012. "Plastic film mulch for half growing-season maximized WUE and yield of potato via moisture-temperature improvement in a semi-arid agroecosystem," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 68-78.
    2. Kato, Tomomichi & Kimura, Reiji & Kamichika, Makio, 2004. "Estimation of evapotranspiration, transpiration ratio and water-use efficiency from a sparse canopy using a compartment model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 65(3), pages 173-191, March.
    3. Yuan, M. & Zhang, L. & Gou, F. & Su, Z. & Spiertz, J.H.J. & van der Werf, W., 2013. "Assessment of crop growth and water productivity for five C3 species in semi-arid Inner Mongolia," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 28-38.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Razmavaran, Mohammad Hadi & Sepaskhah, Ali Reza & Ahmadi, Seyed Hamid, 2024. "Water footprint and production of rain-fed saffron under different planting methods with ridge plastic mulch and pre-flowering irrigation in a semi-arid region," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).
    2. Tahiri, Adel Zeggaf & Anyoji, H. & Yasuda, H., 2006. "Fixed and variable light extinction coefficients for estimating plant transpiration and soil evaporation under irrigated maize," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 84(1-2), pages 186-192, July.
    3. Fan, Yubing & Wang, Chenggang & Nan, Zhibiao, 2014. "Comparative evaluation of crop water use efficiency, economic analysis and net household profit simulation in arid Northwest China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 335-345.
    4. Chen, Xin & Jiang, Li & Zhang, Guoliang & Meng, Lijun & Pan, Zhihua & Lun, Fei & An, Pingli, 2021. "Green-depressing cropping system: A referential land use practice for fallow to ensure a harmonious human-land relationship in the farming-pastoral ecotone of northern China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    5. Chen, Ning & Li, Xianyue & Shi, Haibin & Yan, Jianwen & Zhang, Yuehong & Hu, Qi, 2023. "Evaluating the effects of plastic film mulching duration on soil nitrogen dynamic and comprehensive benefit for corn (Zea mays L.) field," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 286(C).
    6. Gao, Lei & Zhao, Peng & Kang, Shaozhong & Li, Sien & Tong, Ling & Ding, Risheng & Lu, Hongna, 2019. "Surface soil water content dominates the difference between ecosystem and canopy water use efficiency in a sparse vineyard," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    7. Li, Xianyue & Yang, Peiling & Ren, Shumei & Li, Yunkai & Liu, Honglu & Du, Jun & Li, Pingfeng & Wang, Caiyuan & Ren, Liang, 2010. "Modeling cherry orchard evapotranspiration based on an improved dual-source model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 98(1), pages 12-18, December.
    8. Dong, Baodi & Liu, Mengyu & Jiang, Jingwei & Shi, Changhai & Wang, Xiaoming & Qiao, Yunzhou & Liu, Yueyan & Zhao, Zhihai & li, Dongxiao & Si, Fuyan, 2014. "Growth, grain yield, and water use efficiency of rain-fed spring hybrid millet (Setaria italica) in plastic-mulched and unmulched fields," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 93-101.
    9. Lisson, S.N. & Tarbath, M. & Corkrey, R. & Pinkard, E.A. & Laycock, B. & Howden, S.M. & Botwright Acuña, T. & Makin, A., 2016. "Ambient climate and soil effects on the headspace under clear mulch film," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 41-50.
    10. Zhang, Yue & Duan, Yu & Nie, Jiayi & Yang, Jie & Ren, Jianhong & van der Werf, Wopke & Evers, Jochem B. & Zhang, Jun & Su, Zhicheng & Zhang, Lizhen, 2019. "A lack of complementarity for water acquisition limits yield advantage of oats/vetch intercropping in a semi-arid condition," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    11. Gu, Xiao-Bo & Li, Yuan-Nong & Du, Ya-Dan, 2018. "Effects of ridge-furrow film mulching and nitrogen fertilization on growth, seed yield and water productivity of winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) in Northwestern China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 60-70.
    12. Qiu, Rangjian & Liu, Chunwei & Cui, Ningbo & Wu, Youjie & Wang, Zhenchang & Li, Gen, 2019. "Evapotranspiration estimation using a modified Priestley-Taylor model in a rice-wheat rotation system," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 224(C), pages 1-1.
    13. Hou, Xianqing & Li, Rong, 2019. "Interactive effects of autumn tillage with mulching on soil temperature, productivity and water use efficiency of rainfed potato in loess plateau of China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 224(C), pages 1-1.
    14. Nyathi, M.K. & van Halsema, G.E. & Annandale, J.G. & Struik, P.C., 2018. "Calibration and validation of the AquaCrop model for repeatedly harvested leafy vegetables grown under different irrigation regimes," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 107-119.
    15. Yin, Minhua & Li, Yuannong & Fang, Heng & Chen, Pengpeng, 2019. "Biodegradable mulching film with an optimum degradation rate improves soil environment and enhances maize growth," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 127-137.
    16. Sara, Ourrai & Bouchra, Aithssaine & Abdelhakim, Amazirh & Salah, Er-RAKI & Lhoussaine, Bouchaou & Frederic, Jacob & Abdelghani, Chehbouni, 2024. "Assessment of the modified two-source energy balance (TSEB) model for estimating evapotranspiration and its components over an irrigated olive orchard in Morocco," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    17. Gharsallah, O. & Facchi, A. & Gandolfi, C., 2013. "Comparison of six evapotranspiration models for a surface irrigated maize agro-ecosystem in Northern Italy," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 119-130.
    18. Lin, Wen & Liu, Wenzhao & Zhou, Shanshan & Liu, Chunfen, 2019. "Influence of plastic film mulch on maize water use efficiency in the Loess Plateau of China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 224(C), pages 1-1.
    19. Ahmadzadeh Araji, Hamidreza & Wayayok, Aimrun & Massah Bavani, Alireza & Amiri, Ebrahim & Abdullah, Ahmad Fikri & Daneshian, Jahanfar & Teh, C.B.S., 2018. "Impacts of climate change on soybean production under different treatments of field experiments considering the uncertainty of general circulation models," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 63-71.
    20. Sun, Tao & Li, Geng & Ning, Tang-Yuan & Zhang, Zhi-Meng & Mi, Qing-Hua & Lal, Rattan, 2018. "Suitability of mulching with biodegradable film to moderate soil temperature and moisture and to increase photosynthesis and yield in peanut," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 214-223.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:267:y:2022:i:c:s0378377422001585. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.