IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v255y2021ics0378377421002729.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving estimation of in-season crop water use and health of wheat genotypes on sodic soils using spatial interpolation techniques and multi-component metrics

Author

Listed:
  • Choudhury, Malini Roy
  • Mellor, Vincent
  • Das, Sumanta
  • Christopher, Jack
  • Apan, Armando
  • Menzies, Neal W.
  • Chapman, Scott
  • Dang, Yash P.

Abstract

Crop water use can be a useful indicator of in-season crop conditions including health and greenness on sodic soils. However, in-field manual measurements of crop water use can be tedious, time and labour-intensive and may also exhibit large spatial variability, and inefficient for surveying large areas. Here we propose a novel approach to estimate in-field crop water use of wheat using spatial interpolation techniques at critical crop development stages (tillering and close to flowering) on a moderately sodic and a highly sodic site in southern Queensland, Australia. The six spatial interpolation techniques; ordinary kriging, empirical Bayes kriging, inverse distance weighting, spline, local polynomial interpolation, and radial basis function were employed on ground-measured crop water use data and compared to accurately estimate the spatial distribution of crop water use. Initially, the comparison was made using root mean square error, mean absolute error, and coefficient of determination values using cross-validation. For a more clear comparison and to account for complexities of site-specific crop water use distribution, the standardized, multi-component model performance efficiency metrics, i.e. Kling-Gupta efficiency and spatial efficiency were adopted and tested over cross-validation techniques. Results showed that Kling-Gupta efficiency was slightly better at selecting the optimum interpolation models for crop water use estimation at a field scale than the spatial efficiency metric. Spline and local polynomial interpolation were relatively better estimators of crop water use for both the sites at tillering, while the radial basis function and spline were superior close to flowering. The estimated crop water use was positively and closely associated with seasonal GreenSeeker® normalized difference vegetation index data (R2 = 0.49 and 0.39 at tillering; and R2 = 0.71 and 0.62 at close to flowering, for the moderately sodic and highly sodic sites, respectively). The research improves our understanding of selecting appropriate spatial interpolation methods for in-season crop water use estimation that could help detect changes in crop health due to in-field and seasonal variations of crop water use in a sodic soil environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Choudhury, Malini Roy & Mellor, Vincent & Das, Sumanta & Christopher, Jack & Apan, Armando & Menzies, Neal W. & Chapman, Scott & Dang, Yash P., 2021. "Improving estimation of in-season crop water use and health of wheat genotypes on sodic soils using spatial interpolation techniques and multi-component metrics," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:255:y:2021:i:c:s0378377421002729
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2021.107007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377421002729
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2021.107007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xueling Yao & Bojie Fu & Yihe Lü & Feixiang Sun & Shuai Wang & Min Liu, 2013. "Comparison of Four Spatial Interpolation Methods for Estimating Soil Moisture in a Complex Terrain Catchment," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(1), pages 1-13, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohamed A. E. AbdelRahman & Yasser M. Zakarya & Mohamed M. Metwaly & Georgios Koubouris, 2020. "Deciphering Soil Spatial Variability through Geostatistics and Interpolation Techniques," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Beata Ferencz & Jarosław Dawidek, 2021. "Assessment of Spatial and Vertical Variability of Water Quality: Case Study of a Polymictic Polish Lake," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-13, August.
    3. Yasser M. Zakarya & Mohamed M. Metwaly & Mohamed A. E. AbdelRahman & Mohamed R. Metwalli & Georgios Koubouris, 2021. "Optimized Land Use through Integrated Land Suitability and GIS Approach in West El-Minia Governorate, Upper Egypt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-21, November.
    4. Darren Norris & Marie-Josée Fortin & William E Magnusson, 2014. "Towards Monitoring Biodiversity in Amazonian Forests: How Regular Samples Capture Meso-Scale Altitudinal Variation in 25 km2 Plots," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(8), pages 1-9, August.
    5. Mulenga Kalumba & Edwin Nyirenda & Imasiku Nyambe & Stefaan Dondeyne & Jos Van Orshoven, 2022. "Machine Learning Techniques for Estimating Hydraulic Properties of the Topsoil across the Zambezi River Basin," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-22, April.
    6. Prashant K. Srivastava & Prem C. Pandey & George P. Petropoulos & Nektarios N. Kourgialas & Varsha Pandey & Ujjwal Singh, 2019. "GIS and Remote Sensing Aided Information for Soil Moisture Estimation: A Comparative Study of Interpolation Techniques," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-17, April.
    7. Jesús Barrena-González & Joaquín Francisco Lavado Contador & Manuel Pulido Fernández, 2022. "Mapping Soil Properties at a Regional Scale: Assessing Deterministic vs. Geostatistical Interpolation Methods at Different Soil Depths," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-20, August.
    8. Yanto & Arwan Apriyono & Purwanto Bekti Santoso & Sumiyanto, 2022. "Landslide susceptible areas identification using IDW and Ordinary Kriging interpolation techniques from hard soil depth at middle western Central Java, Indonesia," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 110(2), pages 1405-1416, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:255:y:2021:i:c:s0378377421002729. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.