IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v244y2021ics0378377420320795.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving groundwater recharge estimates in alfalfa fields of New Mexico with actual evapotranspiration measurements

Author

Listed:
  • Boyko, Kevin
  • Fernald, Alexander G.
  • Bawazir, A. Salim

Abstract

Quantifying groundwater recharge from irrigation practices of arid regions is necessary for efficient and sustainable groundwater resources management. Recharge is difficult to measure directly, many studies have quantified recharge from agricultural fields as a residual of the soil water balance method (WBM) or by other mathematical models estimating evapotranspiration (ET) and measuring soil moisture, rainfall, and irrigation. ET is often estimated using weather parameters from climate stations that are distant from crops. Flooding of fields is the most common form of irrigation used by farmers in the Mesilla Valley, New Mexico to grow alfalfa, one of the state’s major crops. The objectives of this study were to quantify recharge in flood irrigated alfalfa fields in the Mesilla Valley, New Mexico using the WBM and actual ET measurements during the 2017 growing season. The study fields were different sizes, crop ages, and soil textures. Actual ET of alfalfa was measured on the largest field using the eddy covariance − energy budget method and applied to the two other nearby fields as estimated ET. All other WBM parameters were measured at each study site (i.e. soil moisture, rainfall, and applied irrigation). Recharge using ET referenced to grass (ETsz) was then calculated using weather parameters and compared with measured ET. Recharge ranged from 618 to 716 mm with no significant statistical differences between the three alfalfa fields (f-ratio of 0.8876 and a p-value of 0.42 using ANOVA). Recharge to irrigation ratio ranged from 37% to 45%. On-farm irrigation efficiency ranged from 54.86% to 59.94%. When compared to measured ET, ETsz underestimated recharge of alfalfa by 11% in the WBM and overestimated recharge by 6% when a reduction in ETsz during harvest periods are considered. The results show that the measurement of actual ET improved recharge estimates in the alfalfa fields.

Suggested Citation

  • Boyko, Kevin & Fernald, Alexander G. & Bawazir, A. Salim, 2021. "Improving groundwater recharge estimates in alfalfa fields of New Mexico with actual evapotranspiration measurements," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:244:y:2021:i:c:s0378377420320795
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106532
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377420320795
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106532?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Consoli, S. & Licciardello, F. & Vanella, D. & Pasotti, L. & Villani, G. & Tomei, F., 2016. "Testing the water balance model criteria using TDR measurements, micrometeorological data and satellite-based information," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 68-80.
    2. Consoli, S. & Vanella, D., 2014. "Mapping crop evapotranspiration by integrating vegetation indices into a soil water balance model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 71-81.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daniel G. Gómez & Carlos G. Ochoa & Derek Godwin & Abigail A. Tomasek & María I. Zamora Re, 2022. "Soil Moisture and Water Transport through the Vadose Zone and into the Shallow Aquifer: Field Observations in Irrigated and Non-Irrigated Pasture Fields," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-17, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Longo-Minnolo, G. & Vanella, D. & Consoli, S. & Intrigliolo, D.S. & Ramírez-Cuesta, J.M., 2020. "Integrating forecast meteorological data into the ArcDualKc model for estimating spatially distributed evapotranspiration rates of a citrus orchard," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    2. Nikolaos Gourgouletis & Marianna Gkavrou & Evangelos Baltas, 2023. "Comparison of Empirical ETo Relationships with ERA5-Land and In Situ Data in Greece," Geographies, MDPI, vol. 3(3), pages 1-23, August.
    3. Singh, Ajay, 2016. "Managing the water resources problems of irrigated agriculture through geospatial techniques: An overview," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 2-10.
    4. Awada, Hassan & Di Prima, Simone & Sirca, Costantino & Giadrossich, Filippo & Marras, Serena & Spano, Donatella & Pirastru, Mario, 2022. "A remote sensing and modeling integrated approach for constructing continuous time series of daily actual evapotranspiration," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    5. Mahmoud, Shereif H. & Gan, Thian Yew, 2019. "Irrigation water management in arid regions of Middle East: Assessing spatio-temporal variation of actual evapotranspiration through remote sensing techniques and meteorological data," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 35-47.
    6. Teixeira, Antônio & Leivas, Janice & Struiving, Tiago & Reis, João & Simão, Fúlvio, 2021. "Energy balance and irrigation performance assessments in lemon orchards by applying the SAFER algorithm to Landsat 8 images," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    7. Pôças, I. & Calera, A. & Campos, I. & Cunha, M., 2020. "Remote sensing for estimating and mapping single and basal crop coefficientes: A review on spectral vegetation indices approaches," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    8. Solgi, Shahin & Ahmadi, Seyed Hamid & Seidel, Sabine Julia, 2023. "Remote sensing of canopy water status of the irrigated winter wheat fields and the paired anomaly analyses on the spectral vegetation indices and grain yields," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    9. Carpintero, E. & Mateos, L. & Andreu, A. & González-Dugo, M.P., 2020. "Effect of the differences in spectral response of Mediterranean tree canopies on the estimation of evapotranspiration using vegetation index-based crop coefficients," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 238(C).
    10. Pelosi, A. & Chirico, G.B., 2021. "Regional assessment of daily reference evapotranspiration: Can ground observations be replaced by blending ERA5-Land meteorological reanalysis and CM-SAF satellite-based radiation data?," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    11. Consoli, S. & Licciardello, F. & Vanella, D. & Pasotti, L. & Villani, G. & Tomei, F., 2016. "Testing the water balance model criteria using TDR measurements, micrometeorological data and satellite-based information," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 68-80.
    12. Singh, Ajay, 2019. "Poor-drainage-induced salinization of agricultural lands: Management through structural measures," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 457-463.
    13. Daniela Vanella & Simona Consoli & Alberto Continella & Gaetano Chinnici & Mirco Milani & Giuseppe Luigi Cirelli & Mario D’Amico & Giulia Maesano & Alessandra Gentile & Paolo La Spada & Francesco Scol, 2023. "Environmental and Agro-Economic Sustainability of Olive Orchards Irrigated with Reclaimed Water under Deficit Irrigation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-22, October.
    14. Rallo, G. & Paço, T.A. & Paredes, P. & Puig-Sirera, À. & Massai, R. & Provenzano, G. & Pereira, L.S., 2021. "Updated single and dual crop coefficients for tree and vine fruit crops," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    15. Pereira, L.S. & Paredes, P. & Jovanovic, N., 2020. "Soil water balance models for determining crop water and irrigation requirements and irrigation scheduling focusing on the FAO56 method and the dual Kc approach," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    16. Dzikiti, S. & Volschenk, T. & Midgley, S.J.E & Lötze, E. & Taylor, N.J & Gush, M.B. & Ntshidi, Z. & Zirebwa, S.F & Doko, Q. & Schmeisser, M. & Jarmain, C. & Steyn, W.J & Pienaar, H.H., 2018. "Estimating the water requirements of high yielding and young apple orchards in the winter rainfall areas of South Africa using a dual source evapotranspiration model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 152-162.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:244:y:2021:i:c:s0378377420320795. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.