IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v213y2019icp1063-1077.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Growth and yield response of faba bean to soil moisture regimes and sowing dates: Field experiment and modelling study

Author

Listed:
  • Zeleke, Ketema
  • Nendel, Claas

Abstract

In semiarid environments, faba bean (Vicia faba L.) production shows high year to year variability. In order to implement measures that minimize this variability, it is important to understand how abiotic and management factors affect its growth and yield. The aim of this study is to determine supplemental irrigation strategy and sowing date that maximize yield and water productivity of faba bean. A field experiment and simulation modelling were conducted on a mid-flowering faba bean cultivar under different sowing dates and watering regimes in south-eastern Australia. Drip irrigation, with two laterals plot, was used. At sowing, 20 kg P ha−1 of single-phosphate was applied. Four watering regimes were applied: not irrigated (NI), fully irrigated (FI = 245.1 mm), vegetative-stage irrigated (VI = 60.1 mm), reproductive-stage irrigated (RI = 106.4 mm). Soil water tension was measured monitored using gypsum blocks at 15, 45 and 75 cm depths. The Agricultural Production Systems sIMulator (APSIM) was used to simulate grain yield. Sowing dates were 22 April (SD1) and 20 May (SD2). There was no significant difference between the yields of SD1-fully irrigated (5.24 t ha−1), SD1-reproductive stage irrigated (5.85 t ha−1), SD2-fully irrigated (5.52 t ha−1), and SD2-reproductive stage irrigated (5.24 t ha−1) treatments. The highest grain water use efficiencies, 1.65 kg m-3 and 1.63 kg m-3, were obtained from the reproductive stage irrigated SD1 and SD2, respectively. Harvest index and seed weight were significantly affected by sowing dates while the number of pods per plant and grain water efficiencies were significantly affected by irrigation. There was positive linear relationship between grain yield and post-flowering, rather than pre-/during flowering, green canopy cover. APSIM simulated faba bean yield with RMSE of 468 t ha−1. Simulation modelling showed that supplemental irrigation applied from mid-September to the end of October increased grain yield by 23% relative to the rainfed treatment while supplemental irrigation from mid-August to the end of September resulted in 13% increase. Sowing in the first week of May or in the first week of June, instead of in the first week of April, decreased grain yield by 26% and 52%, respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Zeleke, Ketema & Nendel, Claas, 2019. "Growth and yield response of faba bean to soil moisture regimes and sowing dates: Field experiment and modelling study," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 1063-1077.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:213:y:2019:i:c:p:1063-1077
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2018.12.023
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377418306942
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2018.12.023?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Oweis, Theib & Hachum, Ahmed & Pala, Mustafa, 2005. "Faba bean productivity under rainfed and supplemental irrigation in northern Syria," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 73(1), pages 57-72, April.
    2. Zeleke, K.T. & Nendel, C., 2016. "Analysis of options for increasing wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) yield in south-eastern Australia: The role of irrigation, cultivar choice and time of sowing," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 139-148.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Panayiota Papastylianou & Dimitrios N. Vlachostergios & Christos Dordas & Evangelia Tigka & Paschalis Papakaloudis & Anastasia Kargiotidou & Emmanouil Pratsinakis & Avraam Koskosidis & Chrysanthi Pank, 2021. "Genotype X Environment Interaction Analysis of Faba Bean ( Vicia faba L.) for Biomass and Seed Yield across Different Environments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-18, February.
    2. Zeleke, Ketema & Nendel, Claas, 2024. "Yield response and water productivity of soybean (Glycine max L.) to deficit irrigation and sowing time in south-eastern Australia," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 296(C).
    3. Giannini, Vittoria & Mula, Laura & Carta, Marcella & Patteri, Giacomo & Roggero, Pier Paolo, 2022. "Interplay of irrigation strategies and sowing dates on sunflower yield in semi-arid Mediterranean areas," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mansour, Elsayed & Desoky, El-Sayed M. & Ali, Mohamed M.A. & Abdul-Hamid, Mohamed I. & Ullah, Hayat & Attia, Ahmed & Datta, Avishek, 2021. "Identifying drought-tolerant genotypes of faba bean and their agro-physiological responses to different water regimes in an arid Mediterranean environment," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    2. Marrou, Hélène & Ghanem, Michel Edmond & Amri, Moez & Maalouf, Fouad & Ben Sadoun, Sarah & Kibbou, Fatimaezzhara & Sinclair, Thomas R., 2021. "Restrictive irrigation improves yield and reduces risk for faba bean across the Middle East and North Africa: A modeling study," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    3. Tomaz, Alexandra & Palma, José Ferro & Ramos, Tiago & Costa, Maria Natividade & Rosa, Elizabete & Santos, Marta & Boteta, Luís & Dôres, José & Patanita, Manuel, 2021. "Yield, technological quality and water footprints of wheat under Mediterranean climate conditions: A field experiment to evaluate the effects of irrigation and nitrogen fertilization strategies," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    4. Karrou, M. & Oweis, T., 2012. "Water and land productivities of wheat and food legumes with deficit supplemental irrigation in a Mediterranean environment," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 94-103.
    5. Li, Siping & Zhao, Lei & Sun, Ninghui & Liu, Qing & Li, Huan, 2021. "Photosynthesis product allocation and yield in sweetpotato with different irrigation levels at mid-season," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    6. Manish Yadav & B. B. Vashisht & S. K. Jalota & T. Jyolsna & Samar Pal Singh & Arun Kumar & Amit Kumar & Gurjeet Singh, 2024. "Improving Water Efficiencies in Rural Agriculture for Sustainability of Water Resources: A Review," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 38(10), pages 3505-3526, August.
    7. Oweis, Theib & Hachum, Ahmed, 2006. "Water harvesting and supplemental irrigation for improved water productivity of dry farming systems in West Asia and North Africa," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 80(1-3), pages 57-73, February.
    8. Hao, Shirui & Ryu, Dongryeol & Western, Andrew & Perry, Eileen & Bogena, Heye & Franssen, Harrie Jan Hendricks, 2021. "Performance of a wheat yield prediction model and factors influencing the performance: A review and meta-analysis," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    9. Munyasya, Alex Ndolo & Koskei, Kiprotich & Zhou, Rui & Liu, Shu-Tong & Indoshi, Sylvia Ngaira & Wang, Wei & Zhang, Xu-Cheng & Cheruiyot, Wesly Kiprotich & Mburu, David Mwehia & Nyende, Aggrey Bernard , 2022. "Integrated on-site & off-site rainwater-harvesting system boosts rainfed maize production for better adaptation to climate change," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    10. Singh, Anil Kumar & Singh, K.M. & Bhatt, B.P., 2014. "Efficient water management: way forward to climate smart grain legumes production," MPRA Paper 59316, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 23 Sep 2014.
    11. Zeleke, Ketema & Nendel, Claas, 2024. "Yield response and water productivity of soybean (Glycine max L.) to deficit irrigation and sowing time in south-eastern Australia," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 296(C).
    12. Gastaldi, A. & Alvarez Prado, S. & Arduini, J.A. & Miralles, D.J., 2020. "Optimizing wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) management under dry environments: A case study in the West Pampas of Argentina," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    13. Oweis, T. & Hachum, A., 2009. "Supplemental irrigation for improved rainfed agriculture in WANA region," IWMI Books, Reports H041999, International Water Management Institute.
    14. Yan, Shicheng & Wu, You & Fan, Junliang & Zhang, Fucang & Guo, Jinjin & Zheng, Jing & Wu, Lifeng, 2022. "Quantifying grain yield, protein, nutrient uptake and utilization of winter wheat under various drip fertigation regimes," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:213:y:2019:i:c:p:1063-1077. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.