IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v195y2018icp37-46.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatio-temporal salinity dynamics and yield response of rice in water-seeded rice fields

Author

Listed:
  • Marcos, Mathias
  • Sharifi, Hussain
  • Grattan, Stephen R.
  • Linquist, Bruce A.

Abstract

The scarcity of high quality irrigation water is a global issue facing rice growers, forcing many to adopt water management systems that may result in increased salinity and yield reductions. While salt concentrations in field water have been shown to vary depending on water management, the distribution and build-up patterns of dissolved salts are unclear. This study was conducted to elucidate the within field spatial and temporal salinity dynamics in water-seeded rice cropping systems, and to assess current salinity thresholds for rice yield reduction. In this two-year study, water and soil salinity concentrations of eleven field sites were monitored weekly, with three sampling points being established in the top, middle and bottom basins of each field. There was a consistent spatio-temporal water salinity pattern among all fields: the maximum water salinity within a field occurred during week 2 to week 7 after planting, and was greatest farther from the irrigation inlet and where soil salinity was high. A model developed to predict water salinity within a field indicates that, averaged over an entire growing season, the position within a field contributed to 82% of the variation explained by the model, while preseason soil salinity contributed to 18%. Importantly, field water salinity was determined to be the most sensitive salinity metric for rice yield, as preseason soil salinity was a poor predictor of yield loss. The threshold field water salinity concentration was estimated at 0.88dSm−1, lower than the previous report of 1.9dSm−1. These results illustrate the ability to predict water salinity in a rice field with few parameters, while highlighting the importance of field water salinity as the main salinity metric for rice cropping systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Marcos, Mathias & Sharifi, Hussain & Grattan, Stephen R. & Linquist, Bruce A., 2018. "Spatio-temporal salinity dynamics and yield response of rice in water-seeded rice fields," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 37-46.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:195:y:2018:i:c:p:37-46
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2017.09.016
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377417303116
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2017.09.016?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ellen Hanak & Jay Lund, 2012. "Adapting California’s water management to climate change," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 111(1), pages 17-44, March.
    2. Connor, Jeffery D. & Schwabe, Kurt & King, Darran & Knapp, Keith, 2012. "Irrigated agriculture and climate change: The influence of water supply variability and salinity on adaptation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 149-157.
    3. de Fraiture, Charlotte & Wichelns, Dennis, 2010. "Satisfying future water demands for agriculture," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(4), pages 502-511, April.
    4. Shalhevet, Joseph, 1994. "Using water of marginal quality for crop production: major issues," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 233-269, July.
    5. Molden, David & Oweis, Theib & Steduto, Pasquale & Bindraban, Prem & Hanjra, Munir A. & Kijne, Jacob, 2010. "Improving agricultural water productivity: Between optimism and caution," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(4), pages 528-535, April.
    6. Zeng, Linghe & Shannon, Michael C. & Lesch, Scott M., 2001. "Timing of salinity stress affects rice growth and yield components," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 191-206, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Md Azadul Haque & Mohd Y. Rafii & Martini Mohammad Yusoff & Nusaibah Syd Ali & Oladosu Yusuff & Debi Rani Datta & Mohammad Anisuzzaman & Mohammad Ferdous Ikbal, 2021. "Recent Advances in Rice Varietal Development for Durable Resistance to Biotic and Abiotic Stresses through Marker-Assisted Gene Pyramiding," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-25, September.
    2. LaHue, Gabriel T. & Linquist, Bruce A., 2021. "The contribution of percolation to water balances in water-seeded rice systems," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lankford, B. & Makin, Ian & Matthews, N. & McCornick, Peter G. & Noble, A. & Shah, Tushaar, "undated". "A compact to revitalise large-scale irrigation systems using a leadership-partnership-ownership 'Theory of Change'," Papers published in Journals (Open Access) H047459, International Water Management Institute.
    2. Hanjra, Munir A. & Qureshi, M. Ejaz, 2010. "Global water crisis and future food security in an era of climate change," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 365-377, October.
    3. Eric Njuki & Boris E. Bravo-Ureta, 2019. "Examining irrigation productivity in U.S. agriculture using a single-factor approach," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 125-136, June.
    4. van Halsema, Gerardo E. & Vincent, Linden, 2012. "Efficiency and productivity terms for water management: A matter of contextual relativism versus general absolutism," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 9-15.
    5. Kijne, Jacob W., 2003. "Water productivity under saline conditions," Book Chapters,, International Water Management Institute.
    6. Kijne, Jacob W., 2003. "Water productivity under saline conditions," IWMI Research Reports 158360, International Water Management Institute.
    7. de Fraiture, Charlotte & Molden, David & Wichelns, Dennis, 2010. "Investing in water for food, ecosystems, and livelihoods: An overview of the comprehensive assessment of water management in agriculture," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(4), pages 495-501, April.
    8. Murad, Khandakar Faisal Ibn & Hossain, Akbar & Fakir, Oli Ahmed & Biswas, Sujit Kumar & Sarker, Khokan Kumer & Rannu, Rahena Parvin & Timsina, Jagadish, 2018. "Conjunctive use of saline and fresh water increases the productivity of maize in saline coastal region of Bangladesh," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 262-270.
    9. Facon, T. & Mukherji, Aditi, 2010. "Small-scale irrigation: is this the future?," Conference Papers h043372, International Water Management Institute.
    10. Sapino, Francesco & Pérez-Blanco, C. Dionisio & Gutiérrez-Martín, Carlos & García-Prats, Alberto & Pulido-Velazquez, Manuel, 2022. "Influence of crop-water production functions on the expected performance of water pricing policies in irrigated agriculture," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    11. Kijne, J. W., 2003. "Water productivity under saline conditions," IWMI Books, Reports H032637, International Water Management Institute.
    12. Sebastian Kloss & Raji Pushpalatha & Kefasi Kamoyo & Niels Schütze, 2012. "Evaluation of Crop Models for Simulating and Optimizing Deficit Irrigation Systems in Arid and Semi-arid Countries Under Climate Variability," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 26(4), pages 997-1014, March.
    13. Alvar-Beltrán, Jorge & Saturnin, Coulibaly & Grégoire, Baki & Camacho, Jose Luís & Dao, Abdalla & Migraine, Jean Baptiste & Marta, Anna Dalla, 2023. "Using AquaCrop as a decision-support tool for improved irrigation management in the Sahel region," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 287(C).
    14. Ren, Dongyang & Xu, Xu & Engel, Bernard & Huang, Quanzhong & Xiong, Yunwu & Huo, Zailin & Huang, Guanhua, 2021. "A comprehensive analysis of water productivity in natural vegetation and various crops coexistent agro-ecosystems," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    15. Farhadi Machekposhti, Mabood & Shahnazari, Ali & Z. Ahmadi, Mirkhalegh & Aghajani, Ghasem & Ritzema, Henk, 2017. "Effect of irrigation with sea water on soil salinity and yield of oleic sunflower," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 69-78.
    16. Katerji, N. & van Hoorn, J. W. & Hamdy, A. & Mastrorilli, M., 2004. "Comparison of corn yield response to plant water stress caused by salinity and by drought," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 95-101, March.
    17. Al Zayed, Islam Sabry & Elagib, Nadir Ahmed & Ribbe, Lars & Heinrich, Jürgen, 2016. "Satellite-based evapotranspiration over Gezira Irrigation Scheme, Sudan: A comparative study," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 66-76.
    18. Kaur, Rajbir & Arora, VK, 2019. "Deep tillage and residue mulch effects on productivity and water and nitrogen economy of spring maize in north-west India," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 724-731.
    19. Ehsan Qasemipour & Ali Abbasi & Farhad Tarahomi, 2020. "Water-Saving Scenarios Based on Input–Output Analysis and Virtual Water Concept: A Case in Iran," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-16, January.
    20. Gonçalves, Ivo Zution & Mekonnen, Mesfin M. & Neale, Christopher M.U. & Campos, Isidro & Neale, Michael R., 2020. "Temporal and spatial variations of irrigation water use for commercial corn fields in Central Nebraska," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:195:y:2018:i:c:p:37-46. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.